Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Rate of Uptake of DDT from Soil by Earthworms

Abstract

SINCE 1958, when the occurrence of DDT and its metabolites in the tissues of earthworms was first reported, there have been more than twenty other reports of DDT residues being found in these animals1,2. The amounts found have differed greatly, ranging from minute traces to concentrations of nearly 700 p.p.m., although concentrations of the order of 1 to 10 p.p.m. have been more commonly reported. Sometimes the concentrations of DDT residues found in the earthworms have been less than in the soil where they live, although the tissues of the worms have usually contained greater concentrations than the surrounding soil. When all the published data were considered, it was seen that there is a linear correlation between the concentration of DDT (and other organochlorine insecticides) in earthworms and that in the corresponding soil1. Not all species concentrate insecticides in the same way or to the same degree3; Lumbricus terrestris and other species with permanent burrows take up DDT from the soil surface more readily than from residues that have been thoroughly mixed into the upper strata of soil. Conversely, some of the species without permanent burrows, that tunnel haphazardly through the upper 150 mm of soil, take up more residues from insecticides evenly distributed through the upper soil layers to plough depth.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Edwards, C. A., Persistent Pesticides in the Environment (Chemical Rubber Company Press, 1970).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Edwards, C. A., and Thompson, A. R., Residue Reviews, 45, (1973).

  3. Wheatley, G. A., and Hardman, J. A., J. Sci. Fd Agric., 19, 219 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dindal, D. L., and Wurzingor, K. H., Bull. environ. Contam. Toxicol., 6, 362 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Eberhardt, L. L., Meeks, R. L., and Peterle, T. J., A.E.C. Res. Dev. Rep. B.N.W.L.–1297, 61 (1970).

  6. Barker, R. J., J. Wildl. Mgmt, 22 (3), 269 (1958).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Davis, B. N. K., Ann. appl. Biol., 61, 29 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dimond, J. B., Belyea, G. Y., Kadunce, R. E, Getchell, S. A., and Blease, J. A., Can. Ent., 102, 1122 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. McLane, M. A. R., Stickel, L. F., and Newsan, J. D., Pestic. Mon. J., 3, 248 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gish, C. D., Pestic. Mon. J., 3 (4), 241 (1970).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

EDWARDS, C., JEFFS, K. Rate of Uptake of DDT from Soil by Earthworms. Nature 247, 157–158 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1038/247157a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/247157a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing