Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Detection and Location of an Atmospheric Nuclear Explosion by Microbarograph Arrays

Abstract

SENSITIVE microbarographs which respond to atmospheric pressure variations of a few tens of μbar at periods ranging from 30 s to 5 min can detect the pressure waves set up by atmospheric explosions1. Wind eddies and internal gravity waves of meteorological origin produce more or less similar disturbances, however. The basic problem is to distinguish the signal on the basis of its dispersive pattern, vector velocity and frequency structure against this background. Array techniques have been used successfully in seismology2, oceanography3, magnetism (R. L. Komack, unpublished) and acoustics4,5 to detect wave disturbances and trace their origin. The first step in determining the apparent horizontal velocity of the acoustic gravity wave is to calculate the cross-correlation function for each pair of sensors of an array which is a measure of coherence between the two pressure–time series P1(t) and P2(t) for a time lag τ. The integration interval 2T is large enough to include the entire signal train. The value of τ at which C12 is a maximum provides the best estimate of the delay of a coherent wave propagating from sensor 1 to sensor 2 and hence its apparent velocity in this direction. The apparent velocities along any two arms of the array give an estimate of the arriving wave vector, provided the array dimensions are small enough for the wave front to be considered plane, a condition that is applicable for distant sources. Two or more well separated arrays will therefore enable the source to be located by triangulation with an accuracy which depends on the precision of the direction estimates and hence on the degree of correlation of the signal at each array and the number of contributing arrays. The intersection of the great circles corresponding to the wave vectors to two arrays gives a rough estimate of the source location, however.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yamamoto, R., Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc., 37, 406 (1956).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Birtill, J., and Whiteway, F. E., Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., A, 258, 421 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kinsman, B., Wind Waves—Their Generation and Propagation on the Ocean Surface, 424 (Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Donn, W. L., and Posmentier, E. S., J. Geophys. Res., 72, 2053 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Grover, F. H., Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. Soc., 16, 311 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

VARGHESE, T., KUMAR, V. Detection and Location of an Atmospheric Nuclear Explosion by Microbarograph Arrays. Nature 225, 259–261 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1038/225259a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/225259a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing