Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Evidence against Relationships between Root Cation Exchange Capacity and Cation Uptake by Plants

Abstract

DICOTYLEDONOUS plants usually contain a larger proportion of divalent to monovalent cations than monocotyledons. The cation exchange capacity of the roots of dicotyledons is generally larger than that of monocotyledons1, and many results, starting with Mattson's2, have been published indicating a relationship between root cation exchange capacity and differential uptake of divalent and monovalent cations. Huffaker and Wallace3 explained the good relationships they obtained between cation exchange capacity of roots and concentrations of potassium, calcium and magnesium of several plants, grown in soil and sand, on the basis of Donnan distribution. Other workers4–7 have shown that the cation exchange capacity of plant roots grown in soil-less cultures is not constant but can be altered by changing the composition of the nutrient solutions; in particular, larger cation exchange capacity values have been associated with increased levels of nitrogen. Recently it was reported that the sum of the cations in plants on poor soils was positively correlated with the root cation exchange capacity of the plants8.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Drake, M., Vengris, J., and Colby, W. G., Soil. Sci., 72, 139 (1951).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mattson, S., Lantbr. Hogskolans. Ann., 15, 308 (1948).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Huffaker, R. C., and Wallace, A., Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., 22, 392 (1958).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McLean, E. O., Adams, D., and Franklin, R. E., Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., 20, 345 (1956).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith, R. L., and Wallace, A., Soil Sci., 82, 165 (1956).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Blanc, D., C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 246, 2035 (1958).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Huffaker, R. C., and Wallace, A., Agron. J., 51, 120 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Crooke, W. M., and Knight, A. H., Soil Sci., 93, 365 (1962).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Goring, C. A. I., Soil Sci., 93, 211 (1962).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Knight, A. H., Crooke, W. M., and Inkson, R. H. E., Nature, 192, 142 (1961).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cunningham, R. K., Rep. Rothamsted Exp. Sta. for 1962, 65 (1963).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

CUNNINGHAM, R., NIELSEN, K. Evidence against Relationships between Root Cation Exchange Capacity and Cation Uptake by Plants. Nature 200, 1344–1345 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1038/2001344a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2001344a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing