Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Surgery Insight: surgical management of pancreatic cancer

Nature Clinical Practice Oncology volume 4, pages 526–535 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is a common malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract. The number of new cases diagnosed and the number of deaths each year are almost identical, demonstrating the particularly dismal prognosis for patients affected by this disease. Despite recent advances in the field of medical and radiation oncology, and the introduction of neoadjuvant and adjuvant regimens, surgery remains the single most important modality for the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Surgery for pancreatic cancer is widely viewed as a complex procedure associated with considerable perioperative morbidity and mortality. Many aspects of surgery for pancreatic cancer, such as the extent of resection, the value of vascular resection, the use of laparoscopy, and the importance of treatment at high-volume centers, are currently under debate. This Review describes the current status of surgical treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, and highlights the new developments in this field.

Key Points

  • Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is the fourth most common cause of cancer-related death, and the prognosis for patients with this disease is dismal

  • For patients with pancreatic cancer, complete surgical removal of the pancreatic tumor is the most important factor that determines survival

  • Patients treated at experienced centers demonstrate better short-term and long-term outcome; therefore, treatment should be performed by an experienced team

  • Vascular resections should be performed to achieve an R0 resection

  • Extended lymphadenectomy offers no survival benefit; however, extended resections are justified in order to achieve an R0 resection

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Small pancreatic tumor
Figure 2: Intraoperative photograph of a Whipple procedure with resection and end-to-end reconstruction of the superior mesenteric vein
Figure 3: Intraoperative photograph of a total pancreatectomy with resection of the celiac trunk and reconstruction using a saphenous vein graft
Figure 4: Intraoperative photographs of a Whipple procedure with extended lymphadenectomy (two views (A) (B) in the same patient)

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A et al. (2007) Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 57: 43–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bramhall SR et al. (1995) Treatment and survival in 13,560 patients with pancreatic cancer, and incidence of the disease, in the West Midlands: an epidemiological study. Br J Surg 82: 111–115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. van Heek NT et al. (2005) Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands. Ann Surg 242: 781–788

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Carpelan-Holmstrom M et al. (2005) Does anyone survive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? A nationwide study re-evaluating the data of the Finnish Cancer Registry. Gut 54: 385–387

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kleeff J et al. (2006) Pancreatic cancer: from bench to 5-year survival. Pancreas 33: 111–118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sobin LH and Wittekind C (2002) UICC: TNM classification of malignant tumours. (Sixth edition) London: John Wiley & Sons

  7. Lockhart AC et al. (2005) Treatment for pancreatic cancer: current therapy and continued progress. Gastroenterology 128: 1642–1654

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Spanknebel K and Conlon KC (2001) Advances in the surgical management of pancreatic cancer. Cancer J 7: 312–323

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Muller MW et al. (2006) Middle segmental pancreatic resection: an option to treat benign pancreatic body lesions. Ann Surg 244: 909–918

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kausch W (1912) Das carcinom der papilla duodeni und seine radikale entfernung [German]. Beitr Klin Chir 78: 439–486

    Google Scholar 

  11. Whipple AO et al. (1935) Treatment of carcinoma of the Ampulla of Vater. Ann Surg 102: 763–779

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Gudjonsson B (1995) Carcinoma of the pancreas: critical analysis of costs, results of resections, and the need for standardized reporting. J Am Coll Surg 181: 483–503

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Trede M et al. (2001) Personal observations, opinions, and approaches to cancer of the pancreas and the periampullary area. Surg Clin North Am 8: 595–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Berberat PO et al. (1999) Prevention and treatment of complications in pancreatic cancer surgery. Dig Surg 16: 327–336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McKay A et al. (2006) Meta-analysis of pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 93: 929–936

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wente MN et al. (2007) Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 193: 171–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sikora SS and MC Posner (1995) Management of the pancreatic stump following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 82: 1590–1597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yeo CJ et al. (1995) A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 222: 580–588

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hartel M et al. (2005) Effect of antecolic reconstruction on delayed gastric emptying after the pylorus-preserving Whipple procedure. Arch Surg 140: 1094–1099

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tani M et al. (2006) Improvement of delayed gastric emptying in pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Ann Surg 243: 316–320

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kleeff J et al. (2007) Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 245: 573–582

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Fernandez-del Castillo C et al. (1995) Standards for pancreatic resection in the 1990s. Arch Surg 130: 295–299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lillemoe KD et al. (1999) Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients. Ann Surg 229: 693–698

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Knaebel HP et al. (2005) Systematic review and meta-analysis of technique for closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg 92: 539–546

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schwarz RE et al. (1999) The impact of splenectomy on outcomes after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 188: 516–521

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Aldridge MC and RC Williamson (1991) Distal pancreatectomy with and without splenectomy. Br J Surg 78: 976–979

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Buchler MW et al. (2003) Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 138: 1310–1314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Karpoff HM et al. (2001) Results of total pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Arch Surg 136: 44–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yeo CJ et al. (1995) Pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer of the head of the pancreas: 201 patients. Ann Surg 221: 721–731

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Wagner M et al. (2004) Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 91: 586–594

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wagner M et al. (2001) Pylorus-preserving total pancreatectomy: early and late results. Dig Surg 18: 188–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fuhrman GM et al. (1996) Rationale for en bloc vein resection in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma adherent to the superior mesenteric-portal vein confluence. Pancreatic Tumor Study Group. Ann Surg 223: 154–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Harrison LE et al. (1996) Isolated portal vein involvement in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a contraindication for resection? Ann Surg 224: 342–347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Leach SD et al. (1998) Survival following pancreaticoduodenectomy with resection of the superior mesenteric-portal vein confluence for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. Br J Surg 85: 611–617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Siriwardana HP and Siriwardena AK (2006) Systematic review of outcome of synchronous portal-superior mesenteric vein resection during pancreatectomy for cancer. Br J Surg 93: 662–673

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tseng JF et al. (2004) Pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection: margin status and survival duration. J Gastrointest Surg 8: 935–949

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Weitz J et al. (2007) Portal vein resection for advanced pancreatic head cancer. J Am Coll Surg 4: 712–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kondo S et al. (2003) Results of radical distal pancreatectomy with en bloc resection of the celiac artery for locally advanced cancer of the pancreatic body. Langenbecks Arch Surg 388: 101–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nakao A et al. (2006) Indications and techniques of extended resection for pancreatic cancer. World J Surg 30: 976–982

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ishikawa O et al. (1988) Practical usefulness of lymphatic and connective tissue clearance for the carcinoma of the pancreas head. Ann Surg 208: 215–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Manabe T et al. (1989) Radical pancreatectomy for ductal cell carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Cancer 64: 1132–1137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Michalski CW et al. (2007) Systematic review and meta-analysis of standard and extended lymphadenectomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 94: 265–273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Riall TS et al. (2005) Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma—part 3: update on 5-year survival. J Gastrointest Surg 9: 1191–1204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Schwarz RE and Smith DD (2006) Extent of lymph node retrieval and pancreatic cancer survival: information from a large US population database. Ann Surg Oncol 13: 1189–1200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Pawlik TM et al. (2005) Feasibility of a randomized trial of extended lymphadenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Arch Surg 140: 584–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hishinuma S et al. (2006) Patterns of recurrence after curative resection of pancreatic cancer, based on autopsy findings. J Gastrointest Surg 10: 511–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Watson K (1944) Carcinoma of the Ampulla of Vater: successful radical excision. Br J Surg 31: 368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Traverso LW and Longmire WP Jr (1978) Preservation of the pylorus in pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 146: 959–962

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Yeo CJ et al. (2002) Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma, part 2: randomized controlled trial evaluating survival, morbidity, and mortality. Ann Surg 236: 355–366

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Wenger FA et al. (1999) Gastrointestinal quality of life after duodenopancreatectomy in pancreatic carcinoma—preliminary results of a prospective randomized study: pancreatoduodenectomy or pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy [German]. Chirurg 70: 1454–1459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lin PW et al. (2005) Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head cancer: PPPD versus Whipple procedure. Hepatogastroenterology 52: 1601–1604

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Seiler CA et al. (2000) Randomized prospective trial of pylorus-preserving vs. classic duodenopancreatectomy (Whipple procedure): initial clinical results. J Gastrointest Surg 4: 443–452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Tran KT et al. (2004) Pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy versus standard Whipple procedure: a prospective, randomized, multicenter analysis of 170 patients with pancreatic and periampullary tumors. Ann Surg 240: 738–745

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Diener MK et al. (2007) A systematic review and meta-analysis of pylorus-preserving versus classical pancreaticoduodenectomy for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Ann Surg 245: 187–200

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Horstmann O et al. (2004) Pylorus preservation has no impact on delayed gastric emptying after pancreatic head resection. Pancreas 28: 69–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Pisters PW et al. (2001) Laparoscopy in the staging of pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 88: 325–337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Ferrone CR et al. (2006) The influence of positive peritoneal cytology on survival in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 10: 1347–1353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Ammori BJ and Baghdadi S (2006) Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: the new frontier? Curr Gastroenterol Rep 8: 132–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Croce E et al. (2005) Laparoscopic surgery of pancreatic cancer: state of the art. Hepatogastroenterology 52: 1889–1894

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Halloran CM et al. (2002) Complications of pancreatic cancer resection. Dig Surg 19: 138–146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Yeo CJ et al. (1997) Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 226: 248–257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Rumstadt B et al. (1998) Hemorrhage after pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 227: 236–241

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Bassi C et al. (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138: 8–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Alexakis N et al. (2004) Current standards of surgery for pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 91: 1410–1427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. van Berge Henegouwen MI et al. (1997) Incidence, risk factors, and treatment of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: drainage versus resection of the pancreatic remnant. J Am Coll Surg 185: 18–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Aranha GV et al. (2006) Current management of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 140: 561–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Friess H et al. (1996) Inhibition of secretion in pancreas surgery reduces postoperative complication rate: a meta analysis of 4 multicenter studies [German]. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd 113: 255–258

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Poon RT et al. (2002) Prevention of pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 183: 42–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Buchler M et al. (1992) Role of octreotide in the prevention of postoperative complications following pancreatic resection. Am J Surg 163: 125–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Montorsi M et al. (1995) Efficacy of octreotide in the prevention of pancreatic fistula after elective pancreatic resections: a prospective, controlled, randomized clinical trial. Surgery 117: 26–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Pederzoli P et al. (1994) Efficacy of octreotide in the prevention of complications of elective pancreatic surgery. Italian Study Group. Br J Surg 81: 265–269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Lowy AM et al. (1997) Prospective, randomized trial of octreotide to prevent pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignant disease. Ann Surg 226: 632–641

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Yeo CJ et al. (2000) Does prophylactic octreotide decrease the rates of pancreatic fistula and other complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial. Ann Surg 232: 419–429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Koukoutsis I et al. (2006) Haemorrhage following pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the importance of sentinel bleed. Dig Surg 23: 224–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. DeOliveira ML et al. (2006) Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 244: 931–937

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Winter JM et al. (2006) 1,423 Pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg 10: 1199–1200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Weitz J et al. (2004) Impact of volume and specialization for cancer surgery. Dig Surg 21: 253–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Birkmeyer JD et al. (2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 346: 1128–1137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Birkmeyer JD et al. (2003) Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 349: 2117–2127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Birkmeyer JD et al. (2006) Volume and process of care in high-risk cancer surgery. Cancer 106: 2476–2481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Riall TS et al. (2006) Pancreatic cancer in the general population: improvements in survival over the last decade. J Gastrointest Surg 10: 1212–1224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Cameron JL et al. (2006) One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg 244: 10–15

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Riall TS et al. (2006) Resected periampullary adenocarcinoma: 5-year survivors and their 6- to 10-year follow-up. Surgery 140: 764–772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Cameron JL et al. (1993) One hundred and forty-five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality. Ann Surg 217: 430–435

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Fong Y et al. (2005) Long-term survival is superior after resection for cancer in high-volume centers. Ann Surg 242: 540–544

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Ferrone CR et al. (2005) Validation of a postresection pancreatic adenocarcinoma nomogram for disease-specific survival. J Clin Oncol 23: 7529–7535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Ferrone CR et al. (2006) Perioperative CA19-9 levels can predict stage and survival in patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 24: 2897–2902

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Schniewind B et al. (2006) Quality of life after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. Br J Surg 93: 1099–1107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Koninger J et al. (2007) Surgical palliation in patients with pancreatic cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 392: 13–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Lillemoe KD et al. (1999) Is prophylactic gastrojejunostomy indicated for unresectable periampullary cancer? A prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 230: 322–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Raty S et al. (2006) Complications of palliative hepaticojejunostomy and gastrojejunostomy in unresectable periampullary cancer: patient- and disease-related risk factors. Hepatogastroenterology 53: 133–137

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Van Heek NT et al. (2003) The need for a prophylactic gastrojejunostomy for unresectable periampullary cancer: a prospective randomized multicenter trial with special focus on assessment of quality of life. Ann Surg 238: 894–902

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Bornman PC et al. (1986) Prospective controlled trial of transhepatic biliary endoprosthesis versus bypass surgery for incurable carcinoma of head of pancreas. Lancet 1: 69–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Shepherd HA et al. (1988) Endoscopic biliary endoprosthesis in the palliation of malignant obstruction of the distal common bile duct: a randomized trial. Br J Surg 75: 1166–1168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Andersen JR et al. (1989) Randomised trial of endoscopic endoprosthesis versus operative bypass in malignant obstructive jaundice. Gut 30: 1132–1145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Smith AC et al. (1994) Randomised trial of endoscopic stenting versus surgical bypass in malignant low bileduct obstruction. Lancet 344: 1655–1660

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Reinders ME et al. (1995) Outcome of microscopically nonradical, subtotal pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple's resection) for treatment of pancreatic head tumors. World J Surg 19: 410–414

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Lillemoe KD et al. (1996) Pancreaticoduodenectomy—does it have a role in the palliation of pancreatic cancer? Ann Surg 223: 718–725

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Kuhlmann K et al. (2006) Microscopically incomplete resection offers acceptable palliation in pancreatic cancer. Surgery 139: 188–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Schniewind B et al. (2006) Bypass surgery versus palliative pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with advanced ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head, with an emphasis on quality of life analyses. Ann Surg Oncol 13: 1403–1411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Kleeff J et al. (2007) Surgery for recurrent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 245: 566–572

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Shrikhande SV et al. (2007) Pancreatic resection for M1 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 14: 118–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. all at the Department of Surgery, CW Michalski is a Surgical Resident, J Weitz is Head of the Section of Surgical Oncology, and MW Büchler is Chairman, University of Heidelberg, Germany.,

    Christoph W Michalski, Jürgen Weitz & Markus W Büchler

Authors
  1. Christoph W Michalski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jürgen Weitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Markus W Büchler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus W Büchler.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Michalski, C., Weitz, J. & Büchler, M. Surgery Insight: surgical management of pancreatic cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 4, 526–535 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0925

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0925

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing