Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

An epigenetic mutation responsible for natural variation in floral symmetry

Abstract

Although there have been many molecular studies of morphological mutants generated in the laboratory, it is unclear how these are related to mutants in natural populations, where the constraints of natural selection and breeding structure are quite different. Here we characterize a naturally occurring mutant of Linaria vulgaris, originally described more than 250 years ago by Linnaeus1,2,3, in which the fundamental symmetry of the flower is changed from bilateral to radial. We show that the mutant carries a defect in Lcyc, a homologue of the cycloidea gene which controls dorsoventral asymmetry in Antirrhinum4. The Lcyc gene is extensively methylated and transcriptionally silent in the mutant. This modification is heritable and co-segregates with the mutant phenotype. Occasionally the mutant reverts phenotypically during somatic development, correlating with demethylation of Lcyc and restoration of gene expression. It is surprising that the first natural morphological mutant to be characterized should trace to methylation, given the rarity of this mutational mechanism in the laboratory. This indicates that epigenetic mutations may play a more significant role in evolution than has hitherto been suspected.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Wild-type and peloric Linaria vulgaris flowers.
Figure 2: Development of wild-type and peloric flowers as revealed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and expression of Lcyc during floral development.
Figure 3: Sequence of Lcyc.
Figure 4: RFLP analysis and methylation of Lcyc.
Figure 5: Somatic instability of the peloric phenotype correlates with demethylation of Lcyc.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Linnaeus,C. De Peloria (Diss. Ac. Amoenitates Academicae III, Uppsala, 1749).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gustafsson,A. Linnaeus' peloria: the history of a monster. Theor. Appl. Genet. 54, 241–248 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. De Vries,H. in Species and Varieties: Their Origin by Mutations 459–487 (Open Court, Chicago, 1904).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Luo,D. et al. Origin of floral asymmetry in Antirrhinum. Nature 383, 794–799 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Almeida,J., Rocheta,M. & Galego,L. Genetic control of flower shape in Antirrhinum majus. Development 124, 1387–1392 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Das,O. P. & Messing,J. Variegated phenotype and developmental changes of a maize allele originating from epimutation. Genetics 136, 1121–1141 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Jacobsen,S. E. & Meyerowitz,E. M. Hypermethylated SUPERMAN epigenetic alleles in Arabidopsis. Science 277, 1100–1103 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Counts,J. L. & Goodman,J. I. Alterations in DNA methylation may play a variety of roles in carcinogenesis. Cell 83, 13–15 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Jones,P. A. & Laird,P. W. Cancer epigenetics comes of age. Nature Genet. 21, 163–167 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Docherty,Z. Self-incompatibility in Linaria. Heredity 49, 349–352 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cambareri,E. B., Jensen,B. C., Schabtach,E. & Selker,E. U. Repeat-induced G-C to A-T mutations in Neurospora. Science 244, 1571–1575 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hsieh, C.-L. & Lieber,M. R. CpG methylated minichromosomes become inaccessible for V(D)J recombination after undergoing replication. EMBO J. 11, 315–325 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jablonka,E. & Lamb,M. J. Epigenetic variation in evolution. J. Evol. Biol. 11, 159–183 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jablonka,E. & Lamb,M. J. The inheritance of acquired epigenetic variations. J. Theor. Biol. 139, 69–83 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Williams,M. H. & Green,P. B. Sequencial scanning electron microscopy of a growing plant meristem. Protoplasma 147, 77–79 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brieger,F. G. The inheritance of self-sterility and the peloric flower shape in Antirrhinum. Genetics 17, 385–408 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sherman,M. The inheritance of self-sterility in certain species of Antirrhinum. Z. Indukt Abstammungs-Verebunst 77, 1–17 (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bradley,D. et al. Complementary floral homeotic phenotypes result from opposite orientations of a transposon at the plena locus of Antirrhinum. Cell 72, 85–95 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gubler,U. A one tube reaction for the synthesis of blunt-ended double-stranded cDNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 2726 (1988).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Frohman,M. A., Dush,M. K. & Martin,G. R. Rapid production of full-length cDNAs from rare transcripts: amplification using a single gene-specific oligonucleotide primer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 85, 8998–9002 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Cubas,P., Lauter,N., Doebley,J. & Coen,E. The TCP domain: a motif found in proteins regulating plant growth and development. Plant J. 18, 215–222 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Coen,E. et al. Floricaula: a homeotic gene required for flower development in Antirrhinum majus. Cell 63, 1311–1322 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Carpenter,R. et al. Control of flower development and phyllotaxy by meristem identity genes in Antirrhinum. The Plant Cell 7, 2001–2011 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Bradley,D. et al. Control of inflorescence architecture in Antirrhinum. Nature 379, 791–797 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Linnean Society of London for permission to photograph the specimen of peloric Linaria kept in Linnaeus' herbarium and thank C. Jarvis from the Natural History Museum in London for providing the photograph; we also thank M. Cragg-Barber for providing a living peloric specimen from the UK; N. Hartley for sequencing the genomic Lcyc region; D. Bradley for the Lcentroradialis probe; C. Martin for the Antirrhinum ubiquitin probe; and R. Carpenter, D. Bradley, O. Ratcliffe, I. Amaya and U. Nath for comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the Gatsby Charitable Foundation. P.C. was an EMBO postdoctoral fellow and a EU postdoctoral fellow.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrico Coen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cubas, P., Vincent, C. & Coen, E. An epigenetic mutation responsible for natural variation in floral symmetry. Nature 401, 157–161 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/43657

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/43657

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing