Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Genetic fingerprinting reflects population differentiation in the California Channel Island fox

Abstract

RESTRICTION fragment profiles generated by hybridization of hypervariable minisatellite DNA probes have been used for paternity analysis but not for comparisons at the level of populations, because the profiles are thought to evolve too rapidly to be informative over large time intervals1–3. But in small isolated populations, the fixation of restriction-fragment polymorphisms can outpace the generation of fragment-length variability through recombination. Here we report on an analysis of DNA fingerprints of the California Channel Island fox (Urocyon littoralis). These foxes comprise an island dwarf species found only on six of the Channel Islands off the coast of southern California4,5. Variability of restriction-fragment profiles within fox populations, as indicated by the average percentage difference (APD), varied widely among the islands, from 0.0% (no variation) to 25.3% . The APDs between populations were considerably greater (43.8% to 84.4%). In addition, foxes on each island can be distinguished by the presence of diagnostic restriction fragments. Maximum parsimony and phenetic trees relating foxes from different islands are consistent with the archaeozoological and geological record. Therefore, in small populations of genetically isolated mammals, differences among hypervariable restriction-fragment profiles can be used to estimate relative genetic variability and to reconstruct the evolutionary relationships of natural populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lynch, M. Molec. Biol. Evol. 5, 584–599 (1988).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Burke, T. Trends Ecol. Evol. 4, 139–144 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lewin, R. Science 243, 1549–1551 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hall, E. R. Mammals of North America Vol. 2 (Wiley, New York, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Collins, P. W. in Recent Advances in California Islands Research, (ed. Hochberg, F. G.) (Proc. Third Channel Island Symposium, Santa Barbara, California) (in the press).

  6. Yuhki, N. & O'Brien, S. J. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 836–840 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gilbert, D. A. et al. Am. J. hum. Genet. (in the press).

  8. Jeffreys, A. J., Wilson, V. & Thein, S. L. Nature 316, 76–79 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Burke, T. & Bruford, M. W. Nature 327, 146–152 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wetton, J. H., Carter, R. E., Parkin, D. T. & Walters, D. Nature 327, 147–149 (1987).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jeffreys, A. J. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 2823–2836 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeffreys, A. J. & Morton, D. B. Anim. Genet. 18, 1–15 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Georges, M. et al. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 47, 127–131 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Burke, T., Davis, N. B., Bruford, M. W. & Hatchwell, B. J. Nature 338, 249–251 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wright, S. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations Vol. 2 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  16. O'Brien, S. J. & Everman, J. F. Trends Ecol. Evol. 3, 254–259 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nei, M., Maruyama, T. & Chakraborty, R. Evolution 29, 1–10 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Laughrin, L. in The Califnornia Islands: Proceedings of a Multidisciplinary Symposium (ed. Power, D. M.) 745–749 (Proc. Second Channel Island Symposium, Santa Barabara, California, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kovach, S. D. & Dow, R. J. Island Fox Research on San Nicolas Island (Annual Report, Department of the Navy, Pacific Missile Test Center, Pt. Magu, California, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Brown, W. M., George, M. & Wilson, A. C. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76, 1967–1971 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Avise, J. C. et al. A. Rev. ecol. Syst. 18, 489–522 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jeffreys, A. J., Wilson, V. & Thein, S. L. Nature 314, 67–73 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wayne, R. K. et al. J. Heredity 80, 447–454 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilbert, D., Lehman, N., O'Brien, S. et al. Genetic fingerprinting reflects population differentiation in the California Channel Island fox. Nature 344, 764–767 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1038/344764a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/344764a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing