Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000072

Two attitude dichotomies – implicit versus explicit and affect versus cognition – are presumed to be related. Following a manipulation of attitudinal focus (affective or cognitive), participants completed two implicit measures (Implicit Association Test and the Sorting Paired Features task) and three explicit attitude measures toward cats/dogs (Study 1) and gay/straight people (Study 2). Based on confirmatory factor analysis, both studies showed that explicit attitudes were more related to implicit attitudes in an affective focus than in a cognitive focus. We suggest that, although explicit evaluations can be meaningfully parsed into affective and cognitive components, implicit evaluations are more related to affective than cognitive components of attitudes.

References

  • Aikman, S. N. , Crites, S. L., Jr. (2007). Structure of food attitudes: Replication of Aikman, Crites, and Fabrigar (2006). Appetite, 49, 516–520. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Banse, R. , Seise, J. , & Zerbes, N. (2001). Implicit attitudes toward homosexuality: Reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT. Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 145–160. First citation in articleAbstractGoogle Scholar

  • Bar-Anan, Y. , Nosek, B. A. , Vianello, M. (2009). The sorting paired features task: A measure of association strengths. Experimental Psychology, 56, 329–343. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency and control in social cognition. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. , T. K. Srull, (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., pp. 1–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Baron, R. M. , Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bluemke, M. , Friese, M. (2006). Do features of stimuli influence IAT effects? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 163–176. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Castell, L. , Carraro, L. , Gawronski, B. , Gava, K. (2010). On the determinants of implicit evaluations: When the present weighs more than the past. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 186–191. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Crites, S. L. , Fabrigar, L. R. , Petty, R. E. (1994). Measuring the affective and cognitive properties of attitudes: Conceptual and methodological issues. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 20, 619–634. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cunningham, W. A. , Preacher, K. J. , Banaji, M. R. (2001). Implicit attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychological Science, 12, 163–170. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Houwer, J. , Teige-Mocigemba, S. , Spruyt, A. , Moors, A. (2009). Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 347–368. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H. , Chaiken, S. (1993). Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fabrigar, L. R. , Petty, R. E. (1999). The role of the affective and cognitive bases of attitudes in susceptibility to affectively and cognitively based persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 363–381. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Farley, S. D. , Stasson, M. F. (2003). Relative influences of affect and cognition on behavior: Are feelings or beliefs more related to blood donation intentions? Experimental Psychology, 50, 55–62. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Friese, M. , & Hofmann, W. (2009). Control me or I will control you: Impulses, trait self-control, and the guidance of behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 795–805. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gawronski, B. , Bodenhausen, G. V. (2007). Unraveling the processes underlying evaluation: Attitudes from the perspective of the APE model. Social Cognition, 25, 687–717. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gawronski, B. , LeBel, E. (2008). Understanding patterns of attitude change: When implicit measures change, but explicit measures do not. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1355–1361. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Giner-Sorolla, R. (2004). Is affective material in attitudes more accessible than cognitive material? The moderating role of attitude basis. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 761–780. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A. G. , Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A. G. , Farnham, S. D. (2000). Using the Implicit Association Test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 1022–1038. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A. G. , McGhee, D. E. , Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A. G. , Nosek, B. A. , Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A. G. , Poehlman, T. A. , Uhlmann, E. , Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17–41. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haddock, G. , Maio, G. R. , Arnold, K. , & Huskinson, T. (2008). Should persuasion be affective or cognitive? The moderating effects of need for affect and need for cognition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 769–778. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haddock, G. , Zanna, M. P. (1994). Assessing the impact of affective and cognitive information in predicting attitudes toward capital punishment. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 325–339. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hofmann, W. , Friese, M. , Roefs, A. (2009). Three ways to resist temptation: The independent contributions of executive attention, inhibitory control, and affect regulation on the impulse control of eating behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 431–435. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hofmann, W. , Gawronski, B. , Gschwendner, T. , Le, H. , Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369–1385. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Huntsinger, J. , Smith, C. T. (2009). First though, best thought: Positive mood maintains and negative mood degrades implicit-explicit attitude correspondence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 187–197. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Huskinson, T. L. H. , Haddock, G. (2004). Individual differences in attitude structure: Variance in chronic reliance on affective and cognitive information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 82–90. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jaccard, J. , Wan, C. K. (1999). Measurement error in the analysis of interaction effects between continuous predictors using multiple regression: Multiple indicator and structural equation approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 348–357. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • John, O. P. , Benet-Martinez, V. (2000). Measurement: Reliability, construct validation, and scale construction. In H. T. Reis, C. M. Judd, (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 339–369). New York: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34, 183–202. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lane, K. A. , Banaji, M. R. , Nosek, B. A. , Greenwald, A. G. (2007). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: IV: What we know (so far). In B. Wittenbrink, N. S. Schwarz, (Eds.), Implicit measures of attitudes: Procedures and controversies (pp. 59–102). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lavine, H. , Thomsen, C. J. , Zanna, M. P. , Borgida, E. (1998). On the primacy of affect in the determination of attitudes and behavior: The moderating role of affective-cognitive ambivalence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 398–421. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • LeBel, E. P. , Campbell, L. (2009). Implicit partner affect, relationship satisfaction, and the prediction of romantic breakup. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1291–1294. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacCallum, R. C. , Browne, M. W. , Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moreno, K. N. , Bodenhausen, G. V. (2001). Intergroup affect and social judgment: Feelings as inadmissible information. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4, 21–29. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nisbett, R. , Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nosek, B. A. (2005). Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 565–584. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nosek, B. A. , Greenwald, A. G. (2009). (Part of) the case for a pragmatic approach to validity: Comment on De Houwer, Teige-Mocigemba, Spruyt, and Moors (2009). Psychological Bulletin, 135, 373–376. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nosek, B. A. , Greenwald, A. G. , Banaji, M. R. (2005). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 166–180. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nosek, B. A. , Smyth, F. L. (2007). A multitrait-multimethod validation of the Implicit Association Test: Implicit and explicit attitudes are related but distinct constructs. Experimental Psychology, 54, 14–29. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Nosek, B. A. , Smyth, F. L. , Hansen, J. J. , Devos, T. , Lindner, N. M. , Ranganath, K. A. , ... Banaji, M. R. (2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 36–88. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Payne, B. K. , Govorun, O. , Arbuckle, N. L. (2008). Automatic attitudes and alcohol: Does implicit liking predict drinking? Cognition and Emotion, 22, 238–271. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Petty, R. E. , Wegener, D. T. , Fabrigar, L. R. (1997). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 609–647. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Quirin, M. , Kazen, M. , & Kuhl, J. (2009). When nonsense sounds happy or helpless: The implicit positive and negative affect test (IPANAT). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 500–516. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ranganath, K. A. , Smith, C. T. , Nosek, B. A. (2008). Distinguishing automatic and controlled components of attitudes from direct and indirect measurement methods. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 386–396. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reinecke, J. (2002). Nonlinear structural equation models with the theory of planned behavior: Comparison of multiple group and latent product term analyses. Quality and Quantity, 36, 93–112. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rigdon, E. E. , Schumacker, R. E. , Wothke, W. (1998). A comparative review of interaction and nonlinear modeling. In R. E. Schumacker, G. A. Marcoulides, (Eds.), Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling (pp. 1–16). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rindskopf, D. (1984). Parameterizing inequality constraints on unique variance in linear structural models. Psychometrika, 13, 73–83. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rudman, L. A. (2004). Sources of implicit attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 79–82. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rudman, L. A. , Ashmore, R. D. , Gary, M. L. (2001). “Unlearning” automatic biases: The malleability of implicit stereotypes and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 856–868. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rudman, L. A. , Phelan, J. E. , Hebben, J. B. (2007). Developmental sources of implicit attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1700–1713. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scarabis, M. , Florack, A. , Gosejohann, S. (2006). When consumers follow their feelings: The impact of affective of cognitive focus on the basis of consumers’ choice. Psychology and Marketing, 23, 1015–1023. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • See, Y. H. M. , Petty, R. E. , Fabrigar, L. R. (2008). Affective and cognitive meta-bases of attitudes: Unique effects on information interest and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 938–955. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spence, A. , & Townsend, E. (2008). Spontaneous evaluations: Similarities and differences between the affect heuristic and implicit attitudes. Cognition and Emotion, 22, 83–93. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Steffens, M. C. , Plewe, I. (2001). Items’ cross-category associations as a confounding factor in the Implicit Association Test. Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 123–134. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1928). Attitudes can be measured. The American Journal of Sociology, 33, 529–554. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van den Berg, H. , Manstead, A. S. R. , van der Pligt, J. , Wigboldus, D. H. J. (2006). The impact of affective and cognitive focus on attitude formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 373–379. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Verplanken, B. , Hofstee, G. , Janssen, H. J. (1998). Accessibility of affective versus cognitive components of attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 23–35. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wilson, T. D. , Lisle, D. , Schooler, J. , Hodges, S. D. , Klaaren, K. J. , LaFleur, S. J. (1993). Introspecting about reasons can reduce postchoice satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 331–339. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wu, A. D. , & Zumbo, B. D. (2008). Understanding and using mediators and moderators. Social Indicators Research: An International Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality of Life Measurement, 87, 367–392. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zanna, M. P. , Rempel, J. K. (1988). Attitudes: A new look at an old concept. In D. Bar-Tal, A. W. Kruglanski, (Eds.), The social psychology of knowledge (pp. 315–334). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar