Lack of Automatic Vocal Response Learning While Reading Aloud
An Implicit Sequence Learning Study
Abstract
Abstract. Research on implicit sequence learning with the Serial Reaction Task (SRT) has demonstrated that people automatically acquire knowledge about fixed repeating sequences of responses and can transfer response sequence knowledge to novel stimuli. Such demonstrations are, however, mostly limited to setups with visual stimuli and manual responses. Here we systematically follow up on scarce attempts to demonstrate implicit sequence learning in word reading. While the literature on implicit sequence learning can be taken to suggest that sequence knowledge is acquired and affecting performance in word reading, we show that neither is the case in a series of four experiments. Sequence knowledge was acquired and affecting performance in color naming but not in word reading. On the one hand, we observed slowing of voice-onset times in off-sequence as compared to regularly sequenced trials when people named the color of a centrally presented disk. Yet, hardly any effect was observed when the very same sequence of words was verbalized in word reading instead. Transfer of sequence knowledge to and from color naming was not observed, either. This contrasts with sequence learning studies with manual responses, which have been taken to suggest that a fixed and repeating sequence of responses is sufficient for learning to occur even in fast choice reaction tasks and to transfer across stimuli as long as the sequence of responses remains intact. Rather, in line with dimensional action accounts of task performance, the results underline the role of translation between processing streams for implicit sequence learning.
References
2010). Representing serial action and perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 603–623. https://doi.org/10.3758/pbr.17.5.603
(2008). Asymmetrical learning between a tactile and visual serial RT task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701566739
(1990). Attention and structure in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.1.17
(2005). Modality-constrained statistical learning of tactile, visual, and auditory sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.24
(1993). Attentional and nonattentional forms of sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.1.189
(2006a). Perceptual or motor learning in SRT tasks with complex sequence structures. Psychological Research, 70, 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-004-0196-3
(2006b). The role of response selection in sequence learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 449–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210500462684
(2006c). Spatial processing and perceptual sequence learning in SRT tasks. Experimental Psychology, 53, 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.53.1.16
(2012). Cognitive control: A role for implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1243–1258. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027633
(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
(2017). Does language help regularity learning? The influence of verbalizations on implicit sequential regularity learning and the emergence of explicit knowledge in children, younger and older adults. Developmental Psychology, 53, 597–610. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000262
(1998). Learning versus behavioral expression of the learned: The effects of a secondary tone-counting task on implicit learning in the serial reaction task. Psychological Research, 61, 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004260050015
(1994). Effects of presentation rate and individual differences in short-term memory capacity on an indirect measure of serial learning. Memory & Cognition, 22, 95–110. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03202765
(1999). A secondary tone-counting task suppresses expression of knowledge in the serial reaction task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 260–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.1.260
(2012). Implicit sequence learning based on instructed task set. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1389–1407. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028071
(2012). Instructed task demands and utilization of action effect anticipation. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00578
(2018). Social cues alter implicit motor learning in a serial reaction time task. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 197. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00197
(1997). Transfer and complexity in artificial grammar learning. Cognitive Psychology, 33, 154–207. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1997.0654
(1989). Implicit learning of new verbal associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1070–1082. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.6.1070
(1997). Stimulus-response compatibility and sequential learning in the serial reaction time task. Psychological Research, 60, 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00419682
(2011). Involuntary strategy-dependent dual task performance. Psychological Research, 75, 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0359-y
(2007). Anticipatory response control in motor sequence learning: Evidence from stimulus-response compatibility. Human Movement Science, 26, 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2007.01.004
(2000). The role of stimulus-based and response-based spatial information in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 863–882. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.4.863
(2017). Validation of the continuous tracking paradigm for studying implicit motor learning. Experimental Psychology, 63, 318–325. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000343
(2018). Visuospatial sequence learning on the serial reaction time task modulates the P1 event‐related potential. Psychophysiology, 56, e13292. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13292
(2007). Modularity beyond perception: Evidence from single task interference paradigms. Cognitive Psychology, 55, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.09.003
(2010). Modularity beyond perception: Evidence from the PRP paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017174
(2009, November). Lag-2 repetition cost in task switching backward inhibition of gambler’s fallacy. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society. https://doi.org/10.1037/e520562012-175
(1996). Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: Evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 350–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.2.350
(1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027366
(1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(87)90002-8
(2001). Implicit learning out of the lab: The case of orthographic regularities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 401–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.401
(2006). Interactions between encoding and retrieval in the domain of sequence-learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.118
(2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP + model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114, 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.114.2.273
(1984).
(Components of visual orienting . In H. BoumaD. G. BouwhuisEds., Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 855–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(67)80149-x
(2003). Pure perceptual-based sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 581–597. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.4.581
(2009). Pure perceptual-based sequence learning: A role for visuospatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 528–541. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014646
(1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274(5294), 1926–1928. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.274.5294.1926
(2009). Parallel response selection disrupts sequence learning under dual-task conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 270–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015378
(2002).
(Modularity and artificial grammar learning . In R. FrenchA. CleeremansEds., Implicit Learning and Consciousness (pp. 93–120). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.2003). Relationship between priming and recognition in deterministic and probabilistic sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.2.248
(2018). Modeling implicit learning in a cross-modal audio-visual serial reaction time task. Cognitive Systems Research, 54, 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.10.002
(2011). Flexibility over automaticity: Separable representations for colours and words. Visual Cognition, 19, 392–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2010.544463
(2006). The problem of reversals in assessing implicit sequence learning with serial reaction time tasks. Experimental Brain Research, 175, 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0523-6
(1998). A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 105, 558–584. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.105.3.558
(1999). Implicit motor sequence learning is not purely perceptual. Memory & Cognition, 27, 561–572. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03211549
(1999). The relation between implicit and explicit learning: Evidence for parallel development. Psychological Science, 10, 531–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00201
(1993). Dissociation in a serial response time task using a recognition measure: Comment on Perruchet and Amorim (1992). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1424–1430. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.6.1424
(2000). Implicit motor sequence learning is represented in response locations. Memory & Cognition, 28, 366–375. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03198552
(1998). Inhibition from nonword primes in lexical decision reexamined: The critical influence of instructions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1068. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.24.4.1068
(2002). The impact of response mode on implicit and explicit sequence learning. Experimental Psychology, 49, 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.49.2.153
(