Skip to main content
Research Article

Instruction-Based Approach-Avoidance Effects

Changing Stimulus Evaluation via the Mere Instruction to Approach or Avoid Stimuli

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000282

Prior research suggests that repeatedly approaching or avoiding a certain stimulus changes the liking of this stimulus. We investigated whether these effects of approach and avoidance training occur also when participants do not perform these actions but are merely instructed about the stimulus-action contingencies. Stimulus evaluations were registered using both implicit (Implicit Association Test and evaluative priming) and explicit measures (valence ratings). Instruction-based approach-avoidance effects were observed for relatively neutral fictitious social groups (i.e., Niffites and Luupites), but not for clearly valenced well-known social groups (i.e., Blacks and Whites). We conclude that instructions to approach or avoid stimuli can provide sufficient bases for establishing both implicit and explicit evaluations of novel stimuli and discuss several possible reasons for why similar instruction-based approach-avoidance effects were not found for valenced well-known stimuli.

References

  • Amir, N., Kuckertz, J. M., & Najmi, S. (2013). The effect of modifying automatic action tendencies on overt avoidance behaviors. Emotion, 13, 478–484. doi: 10.1037/a0030443 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Baeyens, F., Eelen, P., & Crombez, G. (1995). Pavlovian associations are forever: On classical conditioning and extinction. Journal of Psychophysiology, 9, 127–141. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(92)90136-5 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Baeyens, F., Eelen, P., Crombez, G., & Van den Bergh, O. (1992). Human evaluative conditioning: Acquisition trials, presentation schedule, evaluative style and contingency awareness. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 27, 279–287. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Priester, J. R., & Berntson, G. G. (1993). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes II: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 5–17. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.5 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215–224. doi: 10.1177/0146167299025002007 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi: 10.1037/00332909.112.1.155 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Dasgupta, N., McGhee, D. E., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2000). Automatic preference for white Americans: Eliminating the familiarity explanation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 316–328. doi: 10.1006/jesp. 1999.1418 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Houwer, J. (2006). Using the Implicit Association Test does not rule out an impact of conscious propositional knowledge on evaluative conditioning. Learning and Motivation, 37, 176–187. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2005.12.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Houwer, J. (2009). The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for association formation models. Learning & Behavior, 37, 1–20. doi: 10.3758/LB.37.1.1 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • De Houwer, J. (2014). A Propositional Model of Implicit Evaluation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 342–353. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12111 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eder, A. B., & Klauer, K. C. (2009). A common-coding account of the bi-directional evaluation behavior link. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 218–235. doi: 10.1037/a0015220 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Eder, A. B., & Rothermund, K. (2008). When do motor behaviors (mis)match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 262–281. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.262 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Elliot, A. J. (2006). The hierarchical model of approach-avoidance motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 111–116. doi: 10.1007/s11031-006-9028-7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fazio, R. H. (2007). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations of varying strength. Social Cognition, 25, 603–637. doi: 10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.603 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229–238. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Field, A. P. (2006). Is conditioning a useful framework for understanding the development and treatment of phobias? Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 857–875. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.05.010 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Gast, A., & De Houwer, J. (2012). Evaluative conditioning without directly experienced pairings of the conditioned and the unconditioned stimuli. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1657–1674. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.665061 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gast, A., & De Houwer, J. (2013). The influence of extinction and counterconditioning instructions on evaluative conditioning effects. Learning and Motivation, 44, 312–325. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2013.03.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gast, A., De Houwer, J., & De Schryver, M. (2012). Evaluative conditioning can be modulated by memory of the CS-US pairings at the time of testing. Learning and Motivation, 43, 116–126. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2012.06.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Gregg, A. P., Seibt, B., & Banaji, M. R. (2006). Easier done than undone: Asymmetry in the malleability of implicit preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 1–20. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.1 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Hofmann, W., De Houwer, J., Perugini, M., Baeyens, F., & Crombez, G. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 390–421. doi: 10.1037/a0018916 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494–500. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, C. R., Vilensky, M. R., Vasey, M. W., & Fazio, R. H. (2013). Approach behavior can mitigate predominately univalent negative attitudes: Evidence regarding insects and spiders. Emotion, 13, 989–996. doi: 10.1037/a0033164 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Kawakami, K., Phills, C. E., Steele, J. R., & Dovidio, J. F. (2007). (Close) distance makes the heart grow fonder: Improving implicit racial evaluations and interracial interactions through approach behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 957–971. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.957 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Laham, S. M., Kashima, Y., Dix, J., Wheeler, M., & Levis, B. (2014). Elaborated contextual framing is necessary for action-based attitude acquisition. Cognition & Emotion, 28, 1119–1120. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.867833 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Mitchell, C. J., De Houwer, J., & Lovibond, P. F. (2009). The propositional nature of human associative learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 183–198. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X09000855 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Neumann, R., Förster, J., & Strack, F. (2003). Motor compatibility: The bidirectional link between behavior and evaluation. In J. MuschK. C. KlauerEds., The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 7–49). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Neumann, R., & Strack, F. (2000). Approach and avoidance: The influence of proprioceptive and exteroceptive cues on encoding of affective information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 39–48. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.1.39 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 184–211. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0903_1 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Ottaway, S. A., Hayden, D. C., & Oakes, M. A. (2001). Implicit attitudes and racism: Effects of word familiarity and frequency on the implicit association test. Social Cognition, 19, 97–144. doi: 10.1521/soco.19.2.97.20706 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Phills, C. E., Kawakami, K., Tabi, E., Nadolny, D., & Inzlicht, M. (2011). Mind the gap: Increasing associations between the self and blacks with approach behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 197–210. doi: 10.1037/a0022159 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, C. T., & De Houwer, J. (in preparation). Hooked on a feeling: Comparing the impact of affective and cognitive persuasive messages on implicit evaluations of smoking. Manuscript in preparation. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, C. T., De Houwer, J., & Nosek, B. (2013). Consider the source: Persuasion of implicit evaluations is moderated by source credibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 193–205. doi: 10.1177/0146167212472374 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Solarz, A. K. (1960). Latency of instrumental responses as a function of compatibility with the meaning of eliciting verbal signs. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 239–245. doi: 10.1037/h0047274 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220–247. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Vandenbosch, K., & De Houwer, J. (2011). Failures to induce implicit evaluations by means of approach-avoid training. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 1311–1330. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.596819 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Wiers, R. W., Eberl, C., Rinck, M., Becker, E., & Lindenmeyer, J. (2011). Re-training automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients’ approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome. Psychological Science, 22, 490–497. doi: 10.1177/0956797611400615 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Woud, M. L., Maas, J., Becker, E. S., & Rinck, M. (2013). Make the manikin move: Symbolic approach-avoidance responses affect implicit and explicit face evaluations. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 738–744. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2013.817413 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar