Instruction-Based Approach-Avoidance Effects
Changing Stimulus Evaluation via the Mere Instruction to Approach or Avoid Stimuli
Abstract
Prior research suggests that repeatedly approaching or avoiding a certain stimulus changes the liking of this stimulus. We investigated whether these effects of approach and avoidance training occur also when participants do not perform these actions but are merely instructed about the stimulus-action contingencies. Stimulus evaluations were registered using both implicit (Implicit Association Test and evaluative priming) and explicit measures (valence ratings). Instruction-based approach-avoidance effects were observed for relatively neutral fictitious social groups (i.e., Niffites and Luupites), but not for clearly valenced well-known social groups (i.e., Blacks and Whites). We conclude that instructions to approach or avoid stimuli can provide sufficient bases for establishing both implicit and explicit evaluations of novel stimuli and discuss several possible reasons for why similar instruction-based approach-avoidance effects were not found for valenced well-known stimuli.
References
2013). The effect of modifying automatic action tendencies on overt avoidance behaviors. Emotion, 13, 478–484. doi: 10.1037/a0030443
(1995). Pavlovian associations are forever: On classical conditioning and extinction. Journal of Psychophysiology, 9, 127–141. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(92)90136-5
(1992). Human evaluative conditioning: Acquisition trials, presentation schedule, evaluative style and contingency awareness. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 27, 279–287.
(1993). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes II: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 5–17. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.5
(1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215–224. doi: 10.1177/0146167299025002007
(1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi: 10.1037/00332909.112.1.155
(2000). Automatic preference for white Americans: Eliminating the familiarity explanation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 316–328. doi: 10.1006/jesp. 1999.1418
(2006). Using the Implicit Association Test does not rule out an impact of conscious propositional knowledge on evaluative conditioning. Learning and Motivation, 37, 176–187. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2005.12.002
(2009). The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for association formation models. Learning & Behavior, 37, 1–20. doi: 10.3758/LB.37.1.1
(2014). A Propositional Model of Implicit Evaluation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 342–353. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12111
(2009). A common-coding account of the bi-directional evaluation behavior link. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 218–235. doi: 10.1037/a0015220
(2008). When do motor behaviors (mis)match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 262–281. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.262
(2006). The hierarchical model of approach-avoidance motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 111–116. doi: 10.1007/s11031-006-9028-7
(2007). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations of varying strength. Social Cognition, 25, 603–637. doi: 10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.603
(1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229–238. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229
(2006). Is conditioning a useful framework for understanding the development and treatment of phobias? Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 857–875. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.05.010
(2012). Evaluative conditioning without directly experienced pairings of the conditioned and the unconditioned stimuli. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1657–1674. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.665061
(2013). The influence of extinction and counterconditioning instructions on evaluative conditioning effects. Learning and Motivation, 44, 312–325. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2013.03.003
(2012). Evaluative conditioning can be modulated by memory of the CS-US pairings at the time of testing. Learning and Motivation, 43, 116–126. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2012.06.001
(2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
(2006). Easier done than undone: Asymmetry in the malleability of implicit preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 1–20. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.1
(2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 390–421. doi: 10.1037/a0018916
(2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494–500. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007
(2013). Approach behavior can mitigate predominately univalent negative attitudes: Evidence regarding insects and spiders. Emotion, 13, 989–996. doi: 10.1037/a0033164
(2007). (Close) distance makes the heart grow fonder: Improving implicit racial evaluations and interracial interactions through approach behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 957–971. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.957
(2014). Elaborated contextual framing is necessary for action-based attitude acquisition. Cognition & Emotion, 28, 1119–1120. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.867833
(2009). The propositional nature of human associative learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 183–198. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X09000855
(2003). Motor compatibility: The bidirectional link between behavior and evaluation. In J. MuschK. C. KlauerEds., The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 7–49). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2000). Approach and avoidance: The influence of proprioceptive and exteroceptive cues on encoding of affective information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 39–48. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.1.39
(2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 184–211. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0903_1
(2001). Implicit attitudes and racism: Effects of word familiarity and frequency on the implicit association test. Social Cognition, 19, 97–144. doi: 10.1521/soco.19.2.97.20706
(2011). Mind the gap: Increasing associations between the self and blacks with approach behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 197–210. doi: 10.1037/a0022159
(in preparation ). Hooked on a feeling: Comparing the impact of affective and cognitive persuasive messages on implicit evaluations of smoking. Manuscript in preparation.2013). Consider the source: Persuasion of implicit evaluations is moderated by source credibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 193–205. doi: 10.1177/0146167212472374
(1960). Latency of instrumental responses as a function of compatibility with the meaning of eliciting verbal signs. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 239–245. doi: 10.1037/h0047274
(2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220–247. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1
(2011). Failures to induce implicit evaluations by means of approach-avoid training. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 1311–1330. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.596819
(2011). Re-training automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients’ approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome. Psychological Science, 22, 490–497. doi: 10.1177/0956797611400615
(2013). Make the manikin move: Symbolic approach-avoidance responses affect implicit and explicit face evaluations. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 738–744. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2013.817413
(