A Unique Asymmetrical Stroop Effect in Absolute Pitch Possessors
Abstract
The Stroop task has been employed to study automaticity or failures of selective attention for many years. The effect is known to be asymmetrical, with words affecting color naming but not vice versa. In the current work two auditory-visual Stroop-like tasks were devised in order to study the automaticity of pitch processing in both absolute pitch (AP) possessors and musically trained controls without AP (nAP). In the tone naming task, participants were asked to name the auditory tone while ignoring a visual note name. In the note naming task, participants were asked to read a note name while ignoring the auditory tone. The nAP group showed a significant congruency effect only in the tone naming task, whereas AP possessors showed the reverse pattern, with a significant congruency effect only in the note reading task. Thus, AP possessors were unable to ignore the auditory tone when asked to read the note, but were unaffected by the verbal note name when asked to label the auditory tone. The results suggest that pitch identification in participants endowed with AP ability is automatic and impossible to suppress.
References
2000). Familial aggregation of absolute pitch. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 67, 755–758.
(2005). Conditional associative memory for musical stimuli in nonmusicians: Implications for absolute pitch. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 7718–7723.
(2003). Absolute pitch and the P300 component of the event-related potential: An exploration of variables that may account for individual differences. Music Perception, 20, 357–382.
(1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332–361.
(1981). Surprise!… surprise?. Psychophysiology, 18, 493–513.
(2000). The development of automaticity in accessing number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 76, 104–122.
(1989). Context effects in Stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 13–42.
(1982). Is three greater than five: The relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks. Memory & Cognition, 10, 389–395.
(2005). Electrophysiological correlates of absolute pitch and relative pitch. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 760–769.
(1981). Perceptual organization and attention. In , Perceptual organization (pp. 181–211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1999). Absolute pitch: Self-reference and human memory. International Journal of Computing and Anticipatory Systems, 4, 255–266.
(2005). Absolute pitch: Perception, coding, and controversies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 26–33.
(1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.
(1998). Training on integrated versus separated Stroop tasks: The progression of interference and facilitation. Memory & Cognition, 26, 201–211.
(1988). Musical pitch identification by absolute pitch possessors. Perception and Psychophysics, 44, 501–512.
(1990). The speed of musical pitch identification by absolute-pitch possessors. Music Perception, 8, 177–188.
(1993). Absolute pitch as an inability: Identification of musical intervals in a tonal context. Music Perception, 11, 55–72.
(1995). Perception of relative pitch with different references: Some absolute-pitch listeners can’t tell musical interval names. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 962–970.
(1988). Perfect pitch. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 29, 763–771.
(2005). Absolute pitch: Music and beyond. Epilepsy and Behavior, 7, 578–601.
(2002). The development of internal representations of magnitude and their association with Arabic numerals. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 81, 74–92.
(1966). Developmental study of color-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 105–108.
(1974). Sensory and verbal coding strategies in subjects with absolute pitch. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55, S9.
(1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.
(1993). Absolute pitch. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 345–361.
(1969). The Stroop test: Selective attention to colours and words. Nature, 222, 437–439.
(1990). Controlling Stroop interference: Evidence from a bilingual task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 760–771.
(1912). The function of the viborissae in the behavior of the white rat. Behavioral Monographs, 1(No. 5).
(1985). Toward a translational model of Stroop interference. Memory & Cognition, 13, 304–319.
(1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 3–24.
(1989). Multiple coding strategies in the retention of musical tones by possessors of absolute pitch. Memory & Cognition, 17, 582–589.
(1998). Functional anatomy of musical processing in listeners with absolute pitch and relative pitch. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 95, 3172–3177.
(1991). Role of the right temporal neocortex in retention of pitch in auditory short-term memory. Brain, 114, 2403–2417.
(