Individual and Combined Effects of Enactment and Testing on Memory for Action Phrases
Abstract
We investigated the individual and combined effects of enactment and testing on memory for action phrases to address whether both study techniques commonly promote item-specific processing. Participants (N = 112) were divided into four groups (n = 28). They either exclusively studied 36 action phrases (e.g., “lift the glass”) or both studied and cued-recalled them in four trials. During study trials participants encoded the action phrases either by motorically performing them, or by reading them aloud, and they took final verb-cued recall tests over 18-min and 1-week retention intervals. A testing effect was demonstrated for action phrases, however, only when they were verbally encoded, and not when they were enacted. Similarly, enactive (relative to verbal) encoding reduced the rate of forgetting, but only when the action phrases were exclusively studied, and not when they were also tested. These less-than-additive effects of enactment and testing on the rate of forgetting, as well as on long-term retention, support the notion that both study techniques effectively promote item-specific processing that can only be marginally increased further by combining them.
References
(1975). Retrieval as a memory modifier. In R. SolsoEd., Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 123–144). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1992). A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation. In A. HealyS. KosslynR. ShiffrinEds., From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes, Vol. 2, (pp. 35–67). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2011). Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1547–1552.
(2007). Testing beyond words: Using tests to enhance visuospatial map learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 474–478.
(2008). The effects of tests on learning and forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 36, 438–448.
(2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
(2001). Action memory: A system-oriented approach. In H. D. ZimmerR. L. CohenM. J. GuynnJ. EngelkampR. Kormi-NouriM. C. FoleyEds., Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic memory? (pp. 49–96). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
(2003). Lexical, conceptual and motor information in memory for action phrases: A multi-system account. Acta Psychologica, 113, 147–165.
(1980). Imaginale und motorische Prozesse beim Behalten verbalen Materials. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 27, 511–533.
(2001). Categorical and order information in free recall of action phrases. Psicologica, 22, 71–96.
(2012). Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 2–18.
(2006). The concept of distinctiveness in memory research. In R. R. HuntJ. B. WorthenEds., Distinctiveness and Memory (pp. 3–25). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
(1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 421–445.
(2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331, 772–775.
(2007). Repeated retrieval during learning is the key to long-term retention. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 151–162.
(2012). Separate mnemonic effects of retrieval practice and elaborative encoding. Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 17–29.
(2010). Retrieval mode distinguishes the testing effect from the generation effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 227–239.
(1991). Having shaved a kiwi fruit: Memory for unfamiliar subject-performed actions. Psychological Research, 53, 203–211.
(1989). Aging and memory for action events: The role of familiarity. Developmental Psychology, 25, 780–786.
(1995). The nature of memory for action events: An episodic integration view. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 7, 337–363.
(1998). The role of integration in recognition failure and action memory. Memory & Cognition, 26, 681–691.
(2001). The motor component is not crucial! In H. D. ZimmerR. L. CohenM. J. GuynnJ. EngelkampR. Kormi-NouriM. A. FoleyEds., Memory for action: A distinct from episodic memory? (pp. 97–111). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
(2011). Why tests appear to prevent forgetting: A distribution-based bifurcation model. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 85–97.
(2012). Tests enhance learning – Compared to what? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 257–259.
(1985). Evaluating forgetting curves. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 397–406.
(1991). Tests and test feedback as learning sources. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 192–201.
(1998). Norms for 439 action events: Familiarity, emotionality, motor activity, and memorability. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 39, 275–300.
(2000). Remembering actions and words. In E. TulvingF. I. M. CraikEds., The Oxford Handbook of Memory (pp. 137–148). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
(1989). Recall of enacted and non-enacted instructions compared: Forgetting functions. Psychological Research, 51, 188–193.
(1995). The role of enactment in implicit and explicit memory. Psychological Research, 57, 215–219.
(1992). Recall of actions, sentences, and nouns – Influences of adult age and passage of time. Acta Psychologica, 79, 245–254.
(2003). Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: Measures of effect size for some common research designs. Psychological Methods, 8, 434–447.
(2010). Enactment and retrieval. Memory & Cognition, 38, 233–243.
(2010). Why testing improves memory: Mediator effectiveness hypothesis. Science, 330, 335.
(2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 20–27.
(2013). Retrieval practice (testing) effect. In H. L. PashlerEd., Encyclopedia of the mind (pp. 660–661). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
(2006a). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 181–210.
(2006b). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249–255.
(2010). Memory for actions – How different? In L. BäckmanL. NybergEds., Memory, Aging and the Brain – A Festschrift in Honour of Lars-Göran Nilsson (pp. 24–52). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
(2011). Exploring the enactment effect from an information processing view: What can we learn from serial position analyses? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52, 509–515.
(2003). The role of item-specific information for the serial position curve in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 5, 954–964.
(1983). Normal forgetting of verbal lists as a function of their degree of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 384–397.
(2009). Decomposing the memory processes contributing to enactment effects by multinomial modeling. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 61–83.
(2006). Decomposing retrieval and integration in memory for actions: A multinomial modelling approach. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 557–576.
(2009). The testing effect and the retention interval: Questions and answers. Experimental Psychology, 56, 252–257.
(2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 498–505.
(2010). The testing effect in free recall is associated with enhanced organizational processes. Memory & Cognition, 38, 995–1008.
