Abstract
Abstract In a series of four experiments measuring behavioral performance and event-related brain potentials (“ERPs”) in a texture segmentation task, we investigated whether there is evidence that texture stimuli containing a local discontinuity (“D-textures”) are conceptually different from homogeneous stimuli (“H-textures”). Stimuli were presented in an oddball design, with relative frequency of D-textures and H-textures being varied between experiments. It was found that these stimuli are not interchangeable in an oddball situation, as rare D-textures in a context of frequent H-textures give rise to the typical N2b-P3b effects, whereas rare H-textures in a context of frequent D-textures do not. This asymmetry arose because D-textures always elicited enlarged P3b components regardless of their relative frequency. It was concluded that the spatial discontinuity in D-textures adds a feature of “targetness” to these stimuli. Moreover, it was found that a posterior negative-going shift in the N2b latency range (“pN2b”) was mainly modulated by visual stimulus features. This result confirms and extends earlier findings demonstrating the sensitivity of the posterior N2b to physical stimulus characteristics.
References
Ahissar, M. , Hochstein, S. (1997). Task difficulty and the specificity of perceptual learning. Nature, 387, 401– 406 .Bach, M. , Meigen, T. (1992). Electrophysiological correlates of texture segregation in the human visual evoked potential. Vision Research, 32, 417– 424 .Bach, M. , Meigen, T. (1997). Similar electrophysiological correlates of texture segregation induced by luminance, orientation, motion, and stereo. Vision Research, 37, 1409– 1414 .Bergen, J.R. (1991). Theories of visual texture perception. In D. Regan (Ed.), Spatial vision (pp. 114-134). New York: CRC Press .Berlad, I. , Pratt, H. (1995). P300 in response to the subject's own name. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology: Evoked Potentials, 96, 472– 474 .Donchin, E. (1981). Surprise! … Surprise?. Psychophysiology, 18, 493– 513 .Duncan-Johnson, C.C. , Donchin, E. (1977). On quantifying surprise: The variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology, 14, 456– 467 .Eimer, M. (1996). The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99, 225– 234 .Gurnsey, R. , Pearson, P. , Day, D. (1996). Texture segmentation along the horizontal meridian: Nonmonotonic changes in Performance with eccentricity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 738– 757 .Joffe, K.M. , Scialfa, C.T. (1995). Texture segmentation as a function of eccentricity, spatial frequency, and target size. Spatial Vision, 9, 325– 342 .Johnson, R. , Donchin, E. (1980). P300 and stimulus categorization: Two plus one is not so different from one plus one. Psychophysiology, 17, 167– 178 .Julesz, B. (1981). Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions. Nature, 290, 91– 97 .Karlin, L. , Martz, M.J. (1973). Response probability and sensory evoked potentials. In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and performance IV (pp. 175-184). New York: Academic Press .Karni, A. , Sagi, D. (1991). Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: Evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 88, 4966– 4970 .Karni, A. , Sagi, D. (1993). The time course of learning a visual skill. Nature, 365, 250– 252 .Kehrer, L. (1987). Perceptual segregation and retinal position. Spatial Vision, 2, 247– 261 .Kehrer, L. (1989). Central performance drop on perceptual segregation tasks. Spatial Vision, 4, 45– 62 .Luck, S.J. , Hillyard, S.A. (1994a). Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Psychophysiology, 31, 291– 308 .Luck, S.J. , Hillyard, S.A. (1994b). Spatial filtering during visual search: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1000– 1014 .Meinecke, C. (1989). Retinal eccentricity and the detection of targets. Psychological Research, 51, 107– 116 .Meinecke, C. , Kehrer, L. (1994). Peripheral and foveal segmentation of angle textures. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 326– 334 .Michie, P.T. , Karayanidis, F. , Smith, G.L. , Barrett, N.A. , Large, M.M. , O'Sullivan, B.T. , Kavanagh, D.J. (1999). An exploration of varieties of visual attention: ERP findings. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 419– 450 .Miller, J.O. , Pachella, R. G. (1973). Locus of the stimulus probability effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 101, 227– 231 .Näätänen, R. (1992). Attention and brain function . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .Nothdurft, H.C. (1991). Textures segmentation and pop-out from orientation contrast. Vision Research, 31, 1073– 1078 .Nothdurft, H.C. (1992). Feature analysis and the role of similarity in preattentive vision. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 355– 375 .Nothdurft, H.C. (1993). The role of features in preattentive vision: Comparison of orientation, motion and color cues. Vision Research, 33, 1937– 1958 .O'Donnell, B.F. , Swearer, J.M. , Smith, L.T , Hokama, H. , McCarley, R.W. (1997). A topographic study of ERPs elicited by visual feature discrimination. Brain Topography, 10, 133– 143 .Picton, T.W. , Hillyard, S.A. (1988). Endogenous event-related potentials. In T.W. Picton (Ed.), Human event-related potentials, EEG handbook_(revised series, Vol. 3, pp. 361-426). Amsterdam: Elsevier .Regan, D. , He, P. (1995). Magnetic and electrical responses of the human brain to texture-defined form and to textons. Journal of Neurophysiology, 74, 1167– 1178 .Ritter, W. , Ruchkin, D.S. (1992). A review of event-related potential components discovered in the context of studying P3a. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 685, 1– 32 .Ritter, W. , Simson, R. , Vaughan, H. G. , Friedman, D. (1979). A brain event related to the making of a sensory discrimination. Science, 203, 1358– 1361 .Ritter, W. , Simson, R. , Vaughan, H. G. , Macht, M. (1982). Manipulation of event-related potential manifestations of information processing stages. Science, 218, 909– 911 .Saarinen, J. , Rovamo, J. , Virsu, V. (1987). Texture discrimination at different eccentricities. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 4, 1699– 1703 .Sagi, D. (1995). The psychophysics of texture segmentation. In T.V. Papathomas, C. Chubb, A. Garea, & E. Kowler (Eds.), Early vision and beyond (pp. 69-78). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .Sagi, D. , Tanne, D. (1994). Perceptual learning: Learning to see. Current opinion in Neurobiology, 4, 195– 199 .Schröger, E. (1997). On the detection of auditory deviants: A preattentive activation model. Psychophysiology, 34, 245– 257 .Scialfa, C.T. , Joffe, K.M. (1995). Preferential processing of target features in texture segmentation. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1201– 1208 .Shiu, L.P. , Pashler, H. (1992). Improvement in line orientation discrimination is retinally local but dependent on cognitive set. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 582– 588 .Smid, H.G.O.M. , Jakob, A. , Heinze, H.J. (1999). An event-related brain potential study of visual selective attention to conjunctions of color and shape. Psychophysiology, 36, 264– 279 .Squires, K. C. , Donchin, E. , Herning, R.I. , McCarthy, G. (1977). On the influence of task relevance and stimulus probability on event-related potential components. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 42, 1– 14 .Srebro, R. , Oguz, R.M. , Purdy, P.D. (1994). Human brain responses to different image contrasts. Vision Research, 34, 849– 861 .Verleger, R. (1997). On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. Psychophysiology, 34, 131– 156 .Wijers, A.A. , Okita, T. , Mulder, G. , Mulder, L.J.M , Lorist, M.M. , Poiesz, R. , Scheffers, M.K. (1987). Visual search and spatial attention: ERPs in focused and divided attention conditions. Biological Psychology, 25, 33– 60 .Wijers, A.A. , Otten, L.J. , Feenstra, S. , Mulder, G. , Mulder, L.J.M (1989). Brain potentials during selective attention, memory search, and mental rotation. Psychophysiology, 26, 425– 467 .Wolfe, J.M. (1992). “Effortless” texture segmentation and “parallel” visual search are not the same thing. Vision Research, 32, 757– 763 .
