Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Kommentar

Kommentar zum Beitrag „Lokale Abhängigkeit von Items im TestDaF-Leseverstehen” von Thomas Eckes

Published Online:March 23, 2015https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000133
Free first page

Literatur

  • Brennan, R. L. (2001a). Generalizability theory. New York, NY: Springer. Crossref, Google Scholar

  • Brennan, R. L. (2001b). Some problems, pitfalls, and paradoxes in educational measurement. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20, 6 – 18. Crossref, Google Scholar

  • Eckes, T. (2015). Lokale Abhängigkeit von Items im TestDaF-Leseverstehen. Eine Testlet-Response-Analyse. Diagnostica, 61, 93 – 106. Link, Google Scholar

  • Ip, E. H. (2010). Empirically indistinguishable multidimensional IRT and locally dependent unidimensional item response models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63, 395 – 416. Crossref, Google Scholar

  • Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar

  • Rauch, W. A. & Moosbrugger, H. (2011). Klassische Testtheorie. Grundlagen und Erweiterungen für heterogene Tests und Mehrfacettenmodelle. In L. F. HornkeM. AmelangM. KerstingHrsg., Methoden der psychologischen Diagnostik (Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Serie Psychologische Diagnostik, Bd. 2, S. 1 – 87). Göttingen: Hogrefe. Google Scholar

  • Raykov, T. & Marcoulides, G. A. (2011). Introduction to psychometric theory. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis. Crossref, Google Scholar

  • Reise, S. P., Moore, T. M. & Haviland, M. G. (2010). Bifactor models and rotations: Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 544 – 559. Crossref, Google Scholar

  • Robitzsch, A. & Lüdtke, O. (2014). Zur (Nicht‐)Modellierung lokaler Abhängigkeiten in Messmodellen: Weshalb der Modellfit kein geeignetes Kriterium für die Modellwahl ist. [Technischer Bericht]. Zugriff am 20. 11. 2014 unter sites.google.com/site/alexanderrobitzsch/ Google Scholar

  • Ten Berge, J. M. (1993). Least squares optimization in multivariate analysis. Leiden: DSWO Press. Google Scholar

  • Tryon, R. C. (1957). Reliability and behavior domain validity: Reformulation and historical critique. Psychological Bulletin, 54, 229 – 249. Crossref, Google Scholar

  • Wainer, H. & Thissen, D. (1996). How is reliability related to the quality of test scores? What is the effect of local dependence on reliability? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 15, 22 – 29. Crossref, Google Scholar