Abstract
Invoking turn-taking to explain conversations has long blocked progress in the field. Not only are there no logical or empirical grounds for saying conversation is constructed out of ‘turns’, but acoustic records show talk to be inseparable from how, in a micro-temporal dimension, individuals orchestrate their words. Conversations are dialogical activity irreducible to sequences of forms: phonetic substance matters.
Talking of ‘turns’ obscures the significance of how people act. By subordinating action to word-based patterns, talk comes to be conceptualized independently of timing. In advocating the contrary view that timing is central to talk, the paper highlights pitch matching. Using acoustic measures, persons are shown to orchestrate the pitch of their voices so that interindividual patterns embody the interpersonal sense of events. Observations about timing thus clarify what listeners hear when utterances are spoken in a particular sense.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh, Scotland: University Press.
Armstrong, D. F., Stokoe, W. C., & Wilcox, S. E. (1995). Gesture and the nature of language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (Eds.), (1984). Structures of social action. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Auer, P., & di Luzio, A. (Eds.). (1992). The contextualization of language. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamens.
Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. London, England: Wildwood House.
Bennett, A. (1981). Interruptions and the interpretation of conversation. Discourse Processes, 4, 171–188.
Bolinger, D. (1986). Intonation and its parts. London, England: E. Arnold.
Bolinger, D. (1989). Intonation and its uses: Melody in grammar and discourse. London, England: E. Arnold.
Brazil, D. (1997). The communicative value of intonation in English. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published at the University of Birmingham, 1985)
Brazil, D., Coulthard, M., & Johns, C. (1980). Discourse intonation and language teaching. London, England: Longman.
Bresnahan, M. I., & Cai, D. H. (1996). Gender and aggression in the recognition of interruption. Discourse Processes, 21, 171–189.
Cameron, D. (1990). Review of D. Roger & P. Bull. “Conversation: an interdisciplinary perspective.” Language and Communication, 10, 219–227.
Chapple, E. D. (1980). The biological foundations of individuality and culture. Huntington, NY: Robert E. Krieger. (Original work published 1970)
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge, University Press.
Coates, J. (1989). Gossip revisited: Language in all female groups. In J. Coates & D. Cameron (Eds.), Women in their speech communities (pp. 94–122). New York: Longman.
Condon, W. S. (1980). The relation of interactional synchrony to cognitive and emotional processes. In M. R. Key (Ed.), The relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1986). An introduction to English prosody. London, England: Edward Arnold.
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1993). English speech rhythm. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamens.
Couper-Kuhlen E. (1996). The prosody of repetition: on quoting and mimicry. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation (pp. 366–405). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (1996). Towards an interactional perspective on prosody and a prosodic perspective on interaction. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation (pp. 11–56). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Cowley, S. J. (1993). The place of prosody in Italian conversations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.
Cowley, S. J. (1994). Conversational functions of rhythmical patterning: A behavioral perspective. Language and Communication, 14, 353–376.
Cowley, S. J. (1997a). Conversation, co-operation and vertebrate communication. Semiotica, 115, 27–52.
Cowley, S. J. (1997b). Of representations and language. Language and Communication, 17, 279–300.
Cowley, S. J. (1998a). Heeding the phonetics of conversation. Unpublished manuscript.
Cowley, S. J. (1998b). The place of prosody in conversations. Unpublished manuscript. (Forthcoming) To appear in Discourse Processes.
Davis, H. G., & Taylor, T. (Ed.). (1990). Redefining linguistics. London, England: Routledge.
Dechert, H. W., & Raupach, M. (1980). Temporalvariables in speech: Studies in honour of F. Goldman-Eisler. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Talk at work. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1988). Primate social systems. London, England: Croom Helm.
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1996). Grooming, gossip and the evolution of language. London, England: Faber and Faber.
Duncan, S., & Fiske D. W. (1985). Interaction, structure and strategy. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Duranti, A. (1997). Polyphonic discourse: overlapping in Samoan ceremonial greetings. Text. 17, 349–381.
Edelsky, C. (1981). Who's got the floor? Language in society, 10, 383–421.
Erickson, F., & Schulz, J. (1982). The counselor as gatekeeper. New York: Academic Press.
Exline, R. V., & Fehr, B. J. (1982). The assessment of gaze and mutual gaze. In K. R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.), Handbook of methods in nonverbal behaviour research (pp. 91–135). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Giles, H., Coupland, J., & Coupland, N. (Eds.). (1991). Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Goldman-Eisler, F. (1968). Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. New York: Academic Press.
Good, D. A. (1989). The viability of conversational grammars. In M. M. Taylor, F. Néel, & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.). The structure of multimodal dialogue (pp. 135–144). New York: North Holland.
Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Gumperz, J. J. (1996). The linguistic and cultural relativity of inference. In J. J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 374–406) Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Harris, R. (1981). The language myth. London, England: Duckworth.
Harris, R. (1990). On redefining linguistics. In H. G. Davis & T. J. Taylor (Eds.), Redefining linguistics (pp. 18–52). London, England: Routledge.
Harris, R. (1996). The language connection. Bristol, England: Theommes Press.
Harris, R. (1997). From an integrational point of view. In G. Wolf (Ed.) Linguistics inside out (pp. 229–310). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamens.
Harris, Z. (1951). Methods in structural linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hart, J. 't, Collier, R., & Cohen, A. (1990). A perceptual sudy of intonation: An experimental approach to speech melody. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Heath, C. (1986). Body movement and speech in medical interaction. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, J. (1989). Current developments in conversation analysis. In D. Roger & P. Bull (Eds.), Conversation (pp. 21–47). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
Hinde, R. A. (1979). Towards understanding relationships. London, England: Academic Press.
Hinde, R. A. (Ed.). (1983). Primate social relationships: An integrated approach. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Hinde, R. A. (1987). Individuals, relationships, and culture. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Hirsch, R. (1989). Argumentation, information, and interaction: Studies in face-to-face interactive argumentation under differing turn-taking conditions. Göteborg, Swedeni Department of Linguistics, University of Göteborg.
Jaffe, J. (1978). Parliamentary procedure and the brain. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.), Nonverbal behavior and communication (pp. 55–66). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Jaffe, J., & Feldstein, S. (1970). Rhythms of dialogue. New York: Academic Press.
Kendon A. (1967). Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologica, 26, 22–63.
Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting interaction. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Kendon, A. (1994). Do gestures communicate? A review. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 27, 175–200.
Ladd, D. R. (1978). The structure of intonational meaning. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Laver, J. (1994). Principles of phonetics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Lenneberg E. H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson S. C. (1995). Interactional biases in human thinking. In E. Goody (Ed.), Social intelligence and interaction (pp. 206–220). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Linell, P. (1982). The written language bias in linguistics. Linköping, Sweden: Department of Communication Studies, University of Linköping.
Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. S. (1970). The voicing dimension: Some experiments in comparative phonetics. In B. Halà, M. Romportl, & P. Janota, (Eds.) Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Phonetic Science (pp. 563–567). Prague, Czechoslovakia: Academia.
MacDorman, K. F. (1996). How to ground symbols adaptively. In S. O'Nuallain, P. McKevitt, & E. MacAogain (Eds.), Readings in computation, content and consciousness. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamens.
Martin, P., & Bateson, P. P. G. (1986). Measuring behaviour, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Martinet, A. (1962). A functional view of language. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
Matthews, P. H. (1979). Generative grammar and linguistic competence. London, England: George Allen Unwin.
Matthews, P. H. (1981). Syntax. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Matthews, P. H. (1997). Structural linguistics in the 1990s. Lingua, 100, 193–203.
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
O'Connell, D. C. (1988). Critical essays on language use and psychology. New York: Springer Verlag.
O'Connell, D. C., Kowal, S., & Kaltenbacher, E. (1990). Turn-taking: A critical view of the research tradition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 19, 345–373.
Oreström, B. (1983). Turn-taking in English conversation. Lund, Sweden: Gleerup.
Power, R. D. J., & dal Martello M. F. (1986). Some criticisms of Sacks, Schlegloff and Jefferson on turn-taking. Semiotica, 58, 29–40.
Reddy, M. (1979). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284–324). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, H., Schlegoff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking in conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
Saussure, F. de (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris, France: Payot. English translation (1959): Course in general linguistics. London, England: Peter Owen.
Schaffer, D. (1983). The role of intonation as a cue to turn-taking in conversation. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 243–259.
Schaffer, H. R. (1996). Social development. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to discourse. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Schlegloff, E. A. (1992). To Searle on conversation:—A note in return. In J. Searle, (On) Searle on Conversation (pp. 113–128) (H. Parret & J. Verschveren, Compilers and Introducers). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamen.
Searle, J. (1992). Conversation. In J. Searle, (On) Searle on conversation (H. Parret & J. Verschueren, Compilers/Introducers). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamens.
Segerdahl, P. (1996). Language use: A philosophical investigation into the basis notions of pragmatics. Basingstoke, England: MacMillan Press.
Siegel, S., & Castellan, N.J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences. (2nd Ed.) Singapore: McGraw Hill.
Siegman, A. W., & Feldstein, S. (Eds.). (1978). Nonverbal behavior and communication. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Sneck, S. (1987). Assessment of chronography in Finnish-English telephone conversation: An attempt at a computer analysis. Jyväskälä: Cross-Language Studies No. 14. Jyväskälä, Finland: University of Jyväskälä.
Sperber, D., & Wilson., D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Sweet, H. (1906). A primer of phonetics. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
Tannen, D. (1983). When is an overlap not an interruption? One component of conversational style. In R. J. Di Pietro, W. Frawley, & A. Wedel (Eds.), The first Deleware Symposium on Language Studies (pp. 119–129). Newark: University of Delaware Press.
Taylor, T. J., & Cameron, D. (1987). Analysing conversation: Rules and units in the structure of talk. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
Tsui, A. B. M. (1994). English conversation. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Van Dijk, T. (1997). Discourse as structure and process. London, England: Sage.
Voghera, M. (1992). Sintassi e intonazione nell'ialiano parlato. Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.
Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H., & Jackson, D. D. (1968). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies and paradoxes. London, England: Faber and Faber.
Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations (2nd ed.) (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Yngve V. H. (1970). On getting a word in edgewise. In. M. A. Campbell et al. (Eds.), Papers from the sixth regional meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 567–578). Chicago Linguistic Society.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cowley, S.J. Of Timing, Turn-Taking, and Conversations. J Psycholinguist Res 27, 541–571 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024948912805
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024948912805