Skip to main content
Log in

Esophageal Visceral Pain Sensitivity (Effects of TENS and Correlation with Manometric Findings)

  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increased esophageal visceral sensitivity hasbeen suggested to be an important factor in thedevelopment of esophageal chest pain. Transcutaneouselectrical nerve stimulation (TENS) has been foundeffective in the treatment of visceral heart pain insevere angina pectoris, but its effect on esophagealpain perception is not known. In this study, we used themethod of graded intraesophageal balloon distension to study the effects of TENS on esophagealmotility and pain sensitivity. In addition, we exploredthe relationship between manometric findings andesophageal susceptibility to pain. TENS reduced symptoms during balloon distension significantly anddecreased peristaltic velocity. Increased visceralperception was positively correlated to the amplitudeand duration of the esophageal peristalsis. This study suggests a correlation between increasedperistaltic waves and visceral perception in theesophagus. TENS appears to reduce esophageal painsensitivity and thus may be a useful treatment fornoncardiac chest pain of esophageal origin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Richter JE: The esophagus and noncardiac che st pain. InThe Esophagus. DO Castell (ed). Boston, Little, Brown, 1995, pp 699 - 724

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kemp HG, Kronmal RA, Vlietstra RE, Frye RL: Seven year survival of patients with normal or near normal coronary angiograms. A CASS study. JACC 7:479 - 483, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ockene IS, Shay MJ, Joseph RN, Alpert JS, Weiner BH, Dalen JE: Unexplained chest pain in patients with normal coronary arteriograms. A follow-up study of functional status. N Engl J Med 303:1249 - 1252, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  4. Richter JE, Bradley LA, Castell DO: Esophage al chest pain: Current controve rsies in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy. Ann Intern Med 110:66 - 78, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  5. Richter JE, Barish CF, Caste ll DO: Abnormal sensory perception in patients with esophage al che st pain. Gastroenterology 91:845- 852, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  6. Trimble KC, Pryde A, Heading RC: Lowered oesophageal sensory thresholds in patients with symptomatic but not excess gastro-oesophageal reflux: Evidence for a spectrum of visceral sensitivity in GORD. Gut 37:7- 12, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shi G, Varannes SBd, Scarpignato C, Rhun ML, Galmiche J-P: Reflux related symptoms in patients with normal oesophageal exposure to acid. Gut 37:457- 464, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barish CF, Castell DO, Richter JE: Graded esophageal balloon distension—a new provocative test for non-cardiac chest pain. Dig Dis Sci 31(12):1292- 1298, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson MI, Ashton CH, Thompson JW: An in-depth study of long-term users of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Implications for clinical use of TENS. Pain 44:221- 229, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mannheimer C, Carlsson CA, Ericson K, Vedin A, Wilhelmsson C: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in seve re angina pectoris. Eur Heart J 3:297- 302, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mannheimer C, Carlsson C-A, Vedin A, Wilhelmsson C: Transcutane ous e lectrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in angina pectoris. Pain 26:291- 300, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mannheimer C, Carlsson CA, Emanue lsson H, Vedin A, Waagste in F, Wilhelmsson C: The e ffects of transcutaneous ele ctrical nerve stimulation in patients with severe angina pectoris. Circulation 71(2):308 - 316, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gue lrud M, Rossiter A, Souney PF, Sulbaran M: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation decrease s lower esophageal sphincter pressure in patients with Achalasia. Dig Dis Sci 36(8):1029 - 1033, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kaada B: Succe ssful treatment of e sophageal dysmotility and Raynaud' s phenomenon in systemic scle rosis and achalasia by transcutaneous nerve stimulation. Scand J Gastroenterol 22:1137- 1146, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guelrud M, Rossiter A, Souney PF, Mendoza S, Mujica V: The effect of transcutaneous nerve stimulation on sphincter of Oddi pressure in patients with biliary dyskinesia. Am J Gastroente rol 86(5):581- 585, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  16. Coffin B, Azpiroz F, Malagelada JR: Somatic stimulation re-duces perception of gut distention in humans. Gastroente rology 107:1636 - 1642, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  17. Augustinsson LE, Carlsson CA, Fall M: Autonomic e ffects of ele ctrostimulation. Appl Neurophysiol 45:185- 189, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mehta AJ, deCae stecker JS, Camm J, Northfi eld TC: Gastrooesophage al reflux in patients with coronary arte ry disease: How common is it and does it matter? Eur J Gastrente rol Hepatol 8:973- 978, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  19. Borg G, Holmgre n A, Lindblad I: Quantitative evaluation of chest pain. Acta Med Scand 644:43- 45, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sjölund BH, Eriksson M, Loeser JD: Transcutane ous and implanted ele ctric stimulation of peripheral nerve s. InThe Management of Pain. JJ Bonica (Ed) Philadelphia, Lea & Fabiger, Vol 2, 1990, pp 1852- 1861

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mannheimer C: Transcutane ous nerve stimulation (TENS) in angina pectoris. Thesis. University of Göteborg, Göteborg, Sweden, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  22. Smout AJPM: Ambulatory monitoring of esophageal pH and pressure. InThe Esophagus. DO Castell (ed). Boston, Little, Brown, 1995, pp 153- 166

    Google Scholar 

  23. Creamer B, Schlege l J: Motor responses of the esophagus to distention. J Appl Physiol 10:498 - 504, 1957

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kendall GPN, Thompson DG, Day SJ, Garvie N: Motor re-sponses of the oesophagus to intraluminal distension in normal subjects and patients with oesophage al clearance disorders. Gut 28:272- 279, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  25. Williams D, Thompson DG, He ggie I, Bance wicz J: Response s of the human esophagus to expe rimental intraluminal distension. Am J Physiol 265(1 Pt 1):G196 - G203, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ke rn-Deschner W, Maher KA, Cattau EL, Benjamin SB: Manome tric responses to balloon distension in patients with nonobstructive dysphagia. Gastroente rology 97:1181- 1185, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  27. Clouse RE, McCord GS, Lustman PJ, Edmundowicz SA: Clinical correlates of abnormal sensitivity to intraesophageal balloon distension. Dig Dis Sci 36(8):1040 - 1045, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  28. Katz PO, Dalton CB, Richter JE, Wu WC, Castell DO: Esophage al testing of patients with noncardiac chest pain or dysphagia— results of three years' expe rience with 1161 pat. Ann Intern Med 106:593- 597, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  29. Richter JE, Hackshaw BT, Wu WC, Castell DO: Edrophonium: A useful provocative test for esophageal che st pain. Ann Int Med 103:14 - 21, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  30. deCaestecker JS, Pryde A, Heading RC: Site and me chanism of pain perception with oesophage al balloon distension and intravenous edrophonium in patients with oesophage al chest pain. Gut 33:580 - 586, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  31. Anand N, Paterson WG: Role of nitric oxide in esophageal peristalsis. Am J Physiol 266(1 Pt 1):G123- G131, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sifrim D, Jansse ns J: Inhibitory and excitatory me chanisms in the control of e sophageal peristalsis in cats. Gastroenterology 108(4):A691, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  33. Milsom I, Hedne r N, Mannheime r C: A comparative study of the effect of high-intensity transcutaneous nerve stimulation and oral naproxen on intrauterine pre ssure and menstrual pain in patients with primary dysmenorrhe a. Am J Obstet Gyne col 170:123- 129, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mannheime r C, Augustinsson L-E, Carlsson C-A, Manhem K, Wilhelmsson C: Epidural spinal e lectrical stimulation in seve re angina pectoris. Br Heart J 59:56 - 61, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mannheime r C, Emanue lsson H, Waagste in F, Wilhelmsson C: Influence of naloxone on the effects of high frequency transcutaneous nerve stimulation in angina pectoris induced by atrial pacing. Br Heart J 62:36 - 42, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  36. Emanue lsson H, Mannhe ime r C, Waagste in F, Wilhelmsson C: Catecholamine metabolism during pacing-induced angina pectoris and the effect of transcutaneous e lectrical nerve stimulation. Am Heart J 114(6):1360 - 1366, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  37. DeJongste M, Hautvast R, Hillege H: Effi cacy of spinal cord stimulation as adjuvant therapy for intractible angina pectoris: a prospective, randomized, clinical study. JACC 23(7):1592- 1597, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mannheimer C, Eliasson T, Andersson B, Be rgh C-H, Augustinsson L-E, Emanuelsson H, Waagste in F: Effects of spinal cord stimulation in angina pectoris induced by pacing and possible mechanisms of action. Br Med J 307:477- 480, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  39. De-Landsheere C, Mannheime r C, Habets A, Guillaume M, Bourgeois I, Augustinsson L-E, Eliasson T, Lamotte D, Kulbertus H, Rigo P: Effect of spinal cord stimulation on regional myocardial perfusion assessed by positron emission tomography. Am J Cardiol 69:1143- 1149, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  40. DeJongste M, Haaksma J, Hautvast R, Hillege H, Meyle r P, Staal M, Sanderson J, Lie K: Effects of spinal cord stimulation on myocardial ischemia during daily life in patients with seve re coronary artery disease. Br Heart J 71:413- 418, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  41. MacKenzie J, Belch J, Land D, Park R, McKillop J: Oesophage al ischemia in motility disorders associated with chest pain. Lancet 2:592- 595, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  42. Liebermann-Meffert DM, Luescher U, Neff U, Ruedl TP, Allgöwer M: Esophagectomy without thoracotomy: Is there a risk of intramediastinal bleeding? A study on blood supply of the esophagus. Ann Surg 206:184 - 192, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  43. Woolf CJ, Thompson JW: Stimulation-induced analge sia: transcutaneous ele ctrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and vibration. InTextbook of Pain. J Melzack, P Wall (eds). Edinburgh, Churchill-Livingstone, 1992, pp 1191- 1208

  44. Melzack R, Wall PD: Pain mechanisms: A new theory. Science 150:971- 979, 1965

    Google Scholar 

  45. Cannon RO: The sensitive heart. JAMA 273(11):883- 887, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  46. Farthing MG: Irritable bowel, irritable body, or irritable brain? Br Med J 310:171- 175, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  47. Mayer EA, Gebhart GF: Basic and clinical aspects of visceral hype ralge sia. Gastroenterology 107:271- 293, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  48. Thompson JW: Opioid peptides. Br Med J 288:259 - 260, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  49. Faccini E, Uzumala H, Govoni S, Missale C, Spano PF, Covelli V, Trabucchi M: Afferent fibers mediate the increase of me tenkephalin elicited in rat spinal cord by localized pain. Pain 18:25- 31, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  50. Augustinsson L, Linderoth B, Mannheime r C: Spinal cord stimulation in various ischemic conditions. InSpinal Cord Dysfunction, Vol III. Functional Stimulation. L Illis (ed). Oxford, Oxford Medical Publications, 1992, pp 272- 295

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Borjesson, M., Pilhall, M., Eliasson, T. et al. Esophageal Visceral Pain Sensitivity (Effects of TENS and Correlation with Manometric Findings). Dig Dis Sci 43, 1621–1628 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018886309364

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018886309364

Navigation