Skip to main content
Log in

Living Environment Preferences of the Inhabitants of Istanbul: A Modified Hierarchical Information Integration Model

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a two-stage research to model the different priorities and expectations about living environment preferences of the inhabitants of Istanbul, Turkey's largest metropolitan with a population of 10 million. In the first stage, a modified hierarchical information integration approach was used to estimate the utilities of different attributes for each individual sampled from the inhabitants of Istanbul. This is a decompositional approach and involves measuring individual preferences. In this study, not only aggregate results are reported but also a segmentation study is carried out to explore the heterogeneity in respondents' preferences. Identification of such segments would help planner offer different planning options to groups with different preferences. Thus, the second stage of this study consists of identifying distinct groups of inhabitants with different preference structures by using cluster analysis. The resulting information is believed to be more useful especially to understand diverging demands of inhabitants of Istanbul.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aldenderfer, M.S. and R.K. Blashfield: 1984, Cluster Analysis (Sage Publications, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, S., C. Godfrey and C. Propper: 1990, Quality of Life: Perspectives and Policies (Biddles Ltd., London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomquist, G.C., M.C. Berger and J.P. Hoehn: 1988, 'New estimates of quality of life in urban areas', American Economic Review 78, pp. 89-107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowling A.: 1995, 'What things are important in people's lives', Social Science and Medicine 41, pp. 1447-1462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R. and D. Savageau: 1981, Places Rated Almanac (Rand McNelly, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownstone, D., D.S. Bunch and K. Train: 2000, 'Joint mixed logit models of stated and revealed preferences for alternative-fuel vehicles', Transportation Research, Part B, 34, pp. 315-338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, N.: 1996, 'Group decision-making and the analytic hierarchy process: Exploring the consensus-relevant information content', Computers and Operations Research 23, pp. 27-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnell and Galster: 1992, 'Quality of life measurements and urban size: An empirical note', Urban Studies 29(5), pp. 727-735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.A. and R.K. Sarin: 1979, 'Measurable multi-attribute value functions', Operation Research 27, pp. 810-822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P.E. and A.M. Kieger: 1996, “Individualised hybrid models for conjoint analysis”, Management Science 42, pp. 850-867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P.E. and V. Srinivasan: 1978, 'Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook', Journal of Consumer Research 5, pp. 103-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J.: 1982, 'Modern utilitarianism', Revue Internationale de Philosophie 141, pp. 331-375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J.F., R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham and W.C. Black: 1995, Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings (Prentice-Hall, New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, D., J. Louviere and J. Swait: 1999, 'Combining sources of preference data', Journal of Econometrics 89, pp. 197-221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky: 1979, 'Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk', Econometrics 47, pp. 263-291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L. and H. Raiffai: 1976, Decision with Multiple Objectives (Wiley, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, P.: 1993, Preparing for the Twenty-first Century (Random House: New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B.C.: 1976, Quality of Life Indicators in U.S. Metropolitan Areas: A Statistical Analysis (Praeger Publishers, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Louviere, J.J.: 1984, 'Hierarchical Information Integration: A New Method For The Design and Analysis of Complex Multiattribute Judgment Problems', Advances in Consumer Research 11, pp. 148-155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louviere, J.J. and G.J. Gaeth: 1987, 'Decomposing the determinants of retail facility choice using the method of hierarchical information integration: A supermarket illustration', Journal of Retailing 63, pp. 25-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louviere, J.J. and H.J.P. Timmermans: 1990, 'Using hierarchical information integration to model consumer responses to possible planning actions: Recreation destination choice illustration', Environment and Planning A 22, pp. 291-308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, N.K.: 1993, Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation (Prentice-Hall, New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, C. and R. Gates: 1993, Contemporary Marketing Research (West Publishing, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Megone, C.: 1990, 'The quality of life: Starting from aristotle', in S. Baldwin, C. Godfrey and C. Propper (eds.), Quality of Life: Perspectives and Policies (Biddles, London, pp. 28-41).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olshavsky, R.W. and D.H. Granbois: 1979, 'Consumer decision making–Fact or fiction', Journal of Consumer Research 6, pp. 93-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppewall, H., J.J. Louviere and H.J.P. Timmermans: 1994 'Modelling hierarchical conjoint process with integrated choice experiments', Journal of Marketing Research 31, pp. 92-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Protassenko, T.: 1997, 'Dynamics of the standard of living in St. Petersburg during five years of economic reform', International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 21, pp. 445-454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan, R. and L.S. Ganesh: 1994, 'Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members' weightages', European Journal of Operational Research 79, pp. 249-265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B.: 1990, 'Decision aid and decision making', European Journal of Operational Research 45, pp. 324-333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T.L.: 1990, 'How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process', European Journal of Operational Research 48, pp. 9-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stover, M.E. and C.L. Leven: 1992, 'Methodological issues in the determination of the quality of life in urban areas', Urban Studies 29, pp. 737-754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sufian, A.J.M.: 1993, 'A multivariate analysis of the determinants of urban quality of Life in the world's largest metropolitan areas', Urban Studies 30, pp. 1319-1329.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Independent Commission on Population and Quality of Life: 1996, Caring for the Future (Oxford University Press, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, H., A. Borgers, J. van Dijk and H. Oppewal: 1992, 'Living choice behavior of dual earner households: A decompositional joint choice model', Environment and Planning A 24, pp. 517-533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tull, D.S. and D.I. Hawkins: 1993, Marketing Research: Measurement and Method (MacMillian, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP Human Development Report: 1994, (Oxford University Press, New York).

  • Ñlengin, B.: 1998, 'Using hierarchical information integration to examine customer preference in banking', The International Journal of Bank Marketing 16, pp. 202-211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Úlengin, B., F. Ñlengin and Ñ. Güvenç: 2001, 'A multidimensional approach to urban quality of life: The case of Istanbul', European Journal of Operation Research 130, pp. 361-374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. and K. Borcherding: 1993, 'Behavioral influences on weight judgments in multiattribute decision making', European Journal of Operation Research 67, pp. 1-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wish, N.B.: 1986, 'Are we really measuring the quality of life? Wellbeing has subjective dimensions, as well as objective one', American Journal of Economics and Sociology 45, pp. 93-99.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ülengin, B., Ülengin, F. & Güvenç, Ü. Living Environment Preferences of the Inhabitants of Istanbul: A Modified Hierarchical Information Integration Model. Social Indicators Research 57, 13–41 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013859201372

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013859201372

Keywords

Navigation