Skip to main content
Log in

The chorioallantoic membrane of the chick embryo as a simple model for the study of the angiogenic and inflammatory response to biomaterials

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Angiogenesis is essential in wound healing and a common feature in chronic inflammation which is crucially involved in the biological response to biomaterials. A useful system to evaluate the angiogenic activity and the inflammatory potency of various agents is the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) of the chick embryo. Here we examined its response to different biomaterials. Smooth materials such as PVC or the polyurethane Tecoflex® either unmodified or modified by an OH- or N(CH3) +3 -end group (HEMA or MAPTAC) inhibited angiogenesis and did not induce the formation of granulation tissue. The anti-angiogenic effects of PVC, Tecoflex® and its HEMA modification, however, were only seen at an early stage of development. In contrast, the MAPTAC modified Tecoflex>® inhibited angiogenesis over the whole time. Rough materials, e.g. filter paper or a collagen/elastin membrane, stimulated angiogenesis and induced the formation of inflammatory tissue. Histological analysis revealed that the filter material was homogeneously populated with cells consisiting mainly of macrophages, fibroblasts and endothelial cells. The collagen/elastin membrane was only partially infiltrated with cells. Among those also clusters of granulocytes were present pointing to an acute inflammatory process. These data show that the angiogenic activity and inflammatory response of biomaterials strongly depend on the chemical composition and the physical structure of the material. The CAM assay appears to be a useful tool for studying biocompatibility. © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. R. JACKSON, M. P. SEED, C. H. KIRCHER, D. A. WILLOUGHBY and J. D. WINKLER, FASEB J. 11 (1997) 457.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. F. WHALEN and B. R. ZETTER, in “Wound Healing: Biochemical and Clinical Aspects,” edited by Cohen, Diegelmann & Lindblad (Saunders Publishers, Philadelphia, 1992) p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. HAFEMANN, S. ENSSLEN, A. ZÜHLKE, C. ERDMANN, R. EBERT, R. NIED-BALLA and C. J. KIRKPATRICK, Burns 25 (1999) 373.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. KLOSTERHALFEN, U. KLINGE and V. SCHUMPELICK, Biomaterials 19 (1998) 2235.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. FOLKMAN, Cancer Res. 34 (1976) 210.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. RIBATTI, A. VACCA, L. RONCALI and F. DAMMACCO F, Int. J. Dev. Biol. 40 (1996) 1189.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. BECKERS, M. GLADIS-VILLANUEVA, W. HAMANN, W. SCHMUTZLER and G. ZWADLO-KLARWASSER, Inflamm. Res. 46 (1997) S29.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. F. D'ARCY and E. M. HOWARD, Br. J. Pharmac. Chemother. 29 (1967) 387.

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. JAKOB, E. D. JENTZSCH, B. MAUERSBERGER and G. HEDER, Exp. Pathol. 15 (1978) 241.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. JAKOB, J. ZIPPER and E. D. JENTZSCH, Exp. Pathol. 21 (1982) 251.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. W. COCKERILL, J. R. GAMBLE and M. A. VADAS, Int. Rev. Cytol. 159 (1995) 113.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. KIAGSBURN, D. KHIGHTON and J. FOLKMAN, Cancer Res. 36 (1976) 110.

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. TANG and J. W. EATON, Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 103 (1995) 466.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. S. O'REILLY, EXS 79 (1997) 273.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. EISENSTEIN, N. SORGENTE, L. W. SOBLE, A. MILLER and K. E. KUETTNER, Am. J. Pathol. 73 (1973) 765.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zwadlo-Klarwasser, G., Görlitz, K., Hafemann, B. et al. The chorioallantoic membrane of the chick embryo as a simple model for the study of the angiogenic and inflammatory response to biomaterials. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 12, 195–199 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008950713001

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008950713001

Keywords

Navigation