Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investment-Specific R and D and the Decline in the Relative Price of Capital

  • Published:
Journal of Economic Growth Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relative price of capital has declined at a rapid rate in the postwar period.This article provides a candidate explanation for this relative price decline—research and development that are embodied in new, more efficient investment goods. The model mimics the secular aspects of the data, and it has the property that the long-run growth rate of consumption is nontrivially determined as a function of the R and D efforts. Because growth is driven by investment in durable goods in the present model, it seems natural to assume that R and D is product-specific and that the firms producing these goods are long-lived profit centers that internalize the dynamic gains from R and D. A result of this assumption is that the growth rate in the decentralized economy is too low: the so-called business stealing effects that may cause the equilibrium growth rate to be too high in other models is internalized here in the form of planned obsolescence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghion, P., and P. Howitt. (1992). “A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction,” Econometrica 60(2), 323–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. (1990). The Measurement of Durable Goods Prices. Chicago: NBER, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J., Z. Hercowitz, and G. W. Huffman. (1988). “Investment, Capacity Utilization and the Business Cycle,” American Economic Review 78(3), 402–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J., Z. Hercowitz, and P. Krusell. (1997a). “Long-Run Implications of Investment-Specific Technological Change,” American Economic Review 87(3), 342–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J., Z. Hercowitz, and P. Krusell. (1997b). “The Role of Investment-Specific Technological Change in the Business Cycle.” Mimeo. European Economic Review (forthcoming).

  • Grossman, G., and E. Helpman. (1991). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krusell, P. (1995). “Dynamic Returns to R&D and the Size Distribution of Firms.” Mimeo.

  • Pesendorfer, W. (1995). “Design Innovation and Fashion Cycles,” American Economic Review 85(4), 771–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. M. (1990). “Endogenous Technological Change,” Journal of Political Economy 98(5: 2), S71–S102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segerstrom, P. (1991). “Innovation, Imitation, and Economic Growth,” Journal of Political Economy, 99(4), 807–827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. M. (1959). “Investment and Technical Progress.” In K. Arrow, S. Karbin, and P. Suppes (Eds.), Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for International Economic Studies, and CEPR, University of Rochester, USA

    Per Krusell

Authors
  1. Per Krusell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krusell, P. Investment-Specific R and D and the Decline in the Relative Price of Capital. Journal of Economic Growth 3, 131–141 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009701518509

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009701518509

Search

Navigation