Abstract
Using the secularization theory and the Marxistnotion of religion as masking class conscienceone would expect the importance of religion andreligious involvement today to wane and belimited to lower class members. To challenge thisexpectation, using a representative nationaltelephone survey of 2004 youth (ages 11–18) andtheir parents, we attempt to answer thefollowing two questions: How religious areteenagers, and what may explain variation inreligious perception and involvement amongteens. Findings suggest that religion remainsperceived as very important by most teenagersand parents report that about two-thirds ofteenagers attended a place of worship at leastmonthly and that two out of five attended asocial group sponsored by a religiousorganization. These findings do not support thesecularization theory. As expected, parentalattendance of religious worship, teen's age,and teen's ethnicity and gender weresignificantly associated with three variablesof religious behavior and attendance. Incontrast to the Marxist notion of religion,measures of socio-economic status indicatethat, in the contemporary United States,religious participation, but not beliefs, islargely the domain of the middle-upper classes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Barna, G.: 1994, Baby Busters: The Disillusioned Generation (Northfield, Chicago).
Barna Research Group: 2000, January 10, Teenagers embrace religion but are not excited about Christianity. Retreived from the Internet February 16, 2003 from: http://www.barna.org/cgi-bin/PagePressRelease.asp?PressReleaseID=45&; Reference=B
Beaudoin, T.: 1998, Virtual Faith (Jossey Bass, San Francisco).
Benda, B.B.: 1995, ‘The effect of religion on adolescent delinquency revisited’, Journal of Research in Crime &; Delinquency 32, pp. 446-466.
Bibby, R.: 2001, Canada's Teens: Today, Yesterday, and Tomorrow (Stoddert, Toronto).
Berger, P.L.: 1967, The Sacred Canopy (Doubleday, Garden City, NY).
Carlson, D.K.: 2000, Americans More Skeptical of Young People Today than They Were 50 Years Ago (The Gallup Organization, Princeton, NJ, also available: http://www.gallup.com/poll/releases/pr001110b.asp
Cnaan, R.A. et al.: 2002, The Invisible Caring Hand: American Congregations and the Provision of Welfare (New York University Press, New York).
Cnaan, R.A. and F. Handy: 2000, ‘Comparing neighbors: Social service provision by religious congregations in Ontario and the U.S.A.', The American Review of Canadian Studies 30, pp. 521-543.
Cochran, J.K.: 1989, ‘Another look at delinquency and religiosity’, Sociological Spectrum 9, pp. 147-162.
Cox, H.: 1998, ‘Forward’, in T. Beaudoin (ed.), Virtual Faith (Jossey Bass, San Francisco), pp. ix-xi.
Davis, W.L.: 1987–88, ‘Men and the church: What keeps them out and what brings them in’, Journal of the Academy for Evangelism in Theological Education 3, pp. 46-61.
de Tocqueville, A.: 1990, Democracy in America, Vol. 1 (Vintage Classics, New York).
de Vaus, D. and I. McAllister: 1987, ‘Gender differences in religion: A test of the structural location theory’, American Sociological Review 52, pp. 472-481.
Furrow, J.L. and L.M. Wagener: 2000, ‘Lessons learned: The role of religion in the development of wisdom in adolescence’, in W.S. Brown (ed.), Understanding Wisdom: Sources, Science, &; Society (Templeton, Philadelphia, PA), pp. 361-391.
Gallup, G., Jr.: 2001, Americans more religious now than ten years ago, but less so than in 1950s and 1960s. Press release by the Gallup Organization, Princeton, NJ. Also: http://www.gallup.com/poll/releases/pr010329.asp
Gorsuch, R.L.: 1995, ‘Religious aspects of substance abuse and recovery’, Journal of Social Issues 51, pp. 65-83.
Hawkins. A.M.W. and R.F. Catalano: 1995, ‘Preventing substance abuse’, in M. Torny and D. Farrington (eds.), Building Safer Society: Strategic Approaches to Crime Prevention, 19 (Chicago University, Chicago), pp. 343-427.
Hoge, D.R. and G.H. Petrillo: 1978, ‘Determinants of church participation and attitudes among high school youth’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 17, pp. 359-379.
Howe, N. and B. Strauss: 1993, Thirteenth Gen: Abort, Retry, Ignore, Fail? (Vintage Books, New York).
Johnston, L.D., J.G. Bachman, P.M. O'Malley: 1976, 1981, 1986, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, Monitoring the Future: Questionnaire Responses from the Nation's High School Seniors (Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan).
Kanagy, C.L., G. Firebaugh and H.M. Nelson: 1994, ‘The narrowing regional gap in church attendance in the United States’, Rural Sociology 59, pp. 515-524.
Kharari, K. and T.N. Harmon: 1984, ‘The relationships between the degree of professed religious beliefs and the use of drugs’, International Journal of Addiction 17, pp. 847-857.
Larson, R.W., M.H. Richards, G. Moneta, G. Holmbeck and E. Duckett: 1996, ‘Changes in adolescents' daily interactions with their families from ages 10 to 18: Disengagement and transformation', Developmental Psychology 32, pp. 744-754.
Lipset, S.M.: 1990, Continental Divide (Routledge, New York).
McBride, D.C., P.B. Mutch and D.D. Chitwood: 1996, ‘Religious belief and the initiation and prevention of drug use among youth’, in C.B. McCoy, L.R. Metsch et al. (eds.), Intervening with Drug-involved Youth (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), pp. 110-130.
Monsma, S.V. and C.J. Soper: 1997, The Challenge of Pluralism (Rowman &; Littlefield, Lanham, MD).
Roof, W.C.: 1999, Spiritual Marketplace: Baby Boomers and the Remaking of American Religion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
Sacerdote, B. and E.L. Glaeser: 2001, Education and Religion. National Bureau of Economic Research working paper No. 8080. Cambridge, MA. Retrieved from the Internet on December 20, 2002: http://www.nber.org/papers/w8080
Sherkat, D.E.: 1998, ‘Counterculture or continuity? Comparing influences on baby boomers' religious orientations and participation’, Social Forces 76, pp. 1087-1115.
Smidt, C.E., J.C. Green, J.L. Guth and L. Kellstedt: 2003, ‘Religious involvement, social capital, and political engagement: A comparison of the United States and Canada’, in C. Smidt (ed.), Religion as Social Capital: Producing the Common Good (Texas A&;M University Press Consortium, College Station, TX).
Smith, C. and R. Faris: 2002, Religion and the Life Attitudes and Self-images of American Adolescents (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, National Study of Youth and Religion, Report No. 2.
Stark, R.: 1999, Secularization, R.I.P. Sociology of Religion 60, pp. 249-273.
Stark, R., C. Kent and D.P. Doyle: 1982, ‘Religiosity and delinquency: The ecology of the lost relationships’, Journal on Crime and Delinquency 7, pp. 83-96.
Swatos, W.H. and K.J. Christiano: 1999, ‘Secularization theory: The course of a concept’, Sociology of Religion 60, pp. 209-228.
The George H. Gallup International Institute: 2000, The spiritual life of young Americans: Approaching the year 2000 (Author, Princeton, NJ).
Ulbrich, H. and M. Wallace: 1984, ‘Women's work force status and church attendance’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 23, pp. 341-350.
Uslander, E.M.: 2002, ‘Religion and civic engagement in Canada and the United States’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 41, pp. 239-254.
Youniss, J., J.A. McLellan and M. Yates: 1999, ‘Religion, community service, and identity in American youth’, Journal of Adolescence 22, pp. 243-253.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cnaan, R.A., Gelles, R.J. & Sinha, J.W. Youth and Religion: The Gameboy Generation Goes to “Church”. Social Indicators Research 68, 175–200 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SOCI.0000025592.60815.37
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SOCI.0000025592.60815.37