Skip to main content
Log in

Ethical Fading: The Role of Self-Deception in Unethical Behavior

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the root of unethical dicisions by identifying the psychological forces that promote self-deception. Self-deception allows one to behave self-interestedly while, at the same time, falsely believing that one's moral principles were upheld. The end result of this internal con game is that the ethical aspects of the decision “fade” into the background, the moral implications obscured. In this paper we identify four enablers of self-deception, including language euphemisms, the slippery slope of decision-making, errors in perceptual causation, and constraints induced by representations of the self. We argue that current solutions to unethical behaviors in organizations, such as ethics training, do not consider the important role of these enablers and hence will be constrained in their potential, producing only limited effectiveness. Amendments to these solutions, which do consider the powerful role of self-deception in unethical decisions, are offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Badaracco, J. L., and Webb, A. P. (1995). Business ethics: A view from the trenches. Calif. Manage. Rev. 37(2): 8-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetuation of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3: 193-209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, J. (1958). The End of the Road, Seeker and Warburg, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, S. (1989). Secrets, Vintage Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, D. (1978). Lying, Vintage Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, L. (2003). Ethics lacking in business school curriculum. New York Times, C3.

  • Business Week Online, (2003, January 21), Retrieved from http://www.businessweek.com

  • Cowley, G., Rosenberg, D., and Brant, M. (1995, July 17). A prescription that kills. Newsweek, p. 54.

  • Dinehart, J., Moberg, D., and Duska, R. (eds.). (2001). The Next Phase of Business Ethics: Integrating Psychology and Ethics, Elsevier Science, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demos, R. (1960). Lying to oneself. J. Philos. 57: 588-595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fandt, P. M., and Ferris, G. R. (1990). The management of information and impressions: When employees behavior opportunistically. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 45: 140-158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fingarette, H. (1969). Self-Deception, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1957). Splitting of the Ego in the Defensive Process. (Collected papers, James, Strachey, ed. and Trans.) Hogarth Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haight, M. R. (1980). A Study of Self-Deception, Harvester Press, Sussex, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, J. (2003). National Business Ethics Survey 2003: How Employees View Ethics in Their Organizations, Ethics Resource Center, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. C., and Hamilton, L. (1989). Crimes of Obedience, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrick, R. P., and Blount, S. (1997). The claiming effect: Why players are more generous in social dilemmas than in ultimatum games. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 31: 479-486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J., and Litterer, J. (1985). Negotiation, Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, II.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1995). A Primer on Decision Making, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maremont, M. (1996, September 16). Anatomy of a fraud. Business Week, pp. 90-94.

  • McGill, A. L., and Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2000). Mutability and propensity in the causal selection process. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 79: 677-689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D. M. (1999a). Dirty secrets. In Thompson, L. L., Levine, J. M., and Messick, D. M. (eds.), Shared Cognition in Organizations: The Management of Knowledge, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 71-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D. M. (1999b). Alternative logics for decision making in social settings. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 38: 11-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D. M., and Bazerman, M. H. (1996). Ethical leadership and the psychology of decision making. Sloan Manage. Rev. 37(2): 9-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D. M., and Tenbrunsel, A. E. (eds.) (1996). Codes of Conduct: Behavioral Research into Business Ethics, Russell Sage, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillutla, M., and Chen, X. P. (1999). Social norms and cooperation in social dilemmas. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 78: 81-103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, C. (1999). The transient effects of limited ethics training. J. Educ. Bus. 74(6): 332-334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritov, I., and Baron, J. (1990). Reluctance to vaccinate: Omission bias and ambiguity. J. Behav. Decis. Making 3: 263-277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speer, A. (1970). Inside the Third Reich, Avon Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenbrunsel, A. E. (1995). Justifying Unethical Behavior: The Role of Expectations of Others' Behavior and Uncertainty. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenbrunsel, A. E., and Messick, D. M. (1999). Sanctioning systems, decision frames, and cooperation. Adm. Sci. Q. 44: 684-707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenbrunsel, A. E., Smith-Crowe, K., and Umphress, E. E. (2003). Building houses on rocks: The role of the ethical infrastructure in organizations. Soc. Justice Res. 16(3): 285-307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, J. (2003, April 24). `Pro forma' in earnings reports?... As if. Wall Street Journal, C1.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ann E. Tenbrunsel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tenbrunsel, A.E., Messick, D.M. Ethical Fading: The Role of Self-Deception in Unethical Behavior. Social Justice Research 17, 223–236 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SORE.0000027411.35832.53

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SORE.0000027411.35832.53

Navigation