Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Arsenic Removal Technologies for Drinking Water Treatment

  • Published:
Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Arsenic contamination as a consequence of human activities such as mining and pesticide use is affecting the water resource quality worldwide. Because of the high risk of arsenic exposure, specific water treatment processes are required to meet the anticipated more severe water quality standards. Better understanding of presently available processes is necessary to develop economic, efficient and effective methods for arsenic removal. Arsenic could either be coagulated, adsorbed using a wide range of materials both mineral and organic or could be directly rejected by membrane processes such as reverse osmosis and nanofiltration. The recent development of submerged hybrid membrane systems, such as membrane bioreactor in wastewater treatment, offers alternative technologies for arsenic treatment. The membrane in hybrid systems allows a better phase separation between the particles binding the arsenic and the treated water. The effect of pH and contact time, and the existence of other ionic compounds must be taken into account when designing the system for optimum arsenic rejection. Further research on both hydraulic and removal performances of hybrid adsorption/membrane technology is still required to assess the full potential of this technology for arsenic removal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdessemed D & Nezzal G (2003) Treatment of primary e. uent by coagulation-adsorption-ultra ltration for reuse. Desalination 152(1-3): 367–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Altundogan HS, Altundogan S, Tumen F & Bildik M (2000) Arsenic removal from aqueous solution by adsorption on red mud. Waste Manag. 20(8): 761–767

    Google Scholar 

  • Altundogan HS, Altundogan S, Tumen F & Bildik M (2002) Arsenic adsorption from aqueous solution by activated red mud. Waste Manage. 22 (3): 357–363

    Google Scholar 

  • AWWA (American Water Works Association) (1999) Water Quality and Treatment-A Handbook of Community Water Supplies. McGraw Hill, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bansode RR, Losso JN, Marshell WE, Rao RM & Portier RJ (2003) Adsorption of metal ions pecan shell-based granular activated carbons. Biores. Technol.89: 115–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett M, Bird MR & Howell JA (1995) An experimental study for the development of a quantitative membrane cleaning model. J. Membr. Sci.105: 147–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosso ST & Enzweiler J (2002) Evaluation of heavy metal removal from aqueous solution onto scolecite. Water Res.36: 4795–4800

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouhabila EH, Ben Aim R & Buisson H (2001) Fouling characterization in membrane bioreactors. Separation Purif-icat. Technol. 22-23: 123–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandhuber P & Amy G (1998) Alternative methods for membrane ltration of arsenic from drinking water. Desalination 117: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandhuber P & Amy G (2001) Arsenic removal by a charged ultra ltration membrane-in. uences of membrane operating conditions and water quality on arsenic removal. Desalination 140: 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerjan-Stefanovic S, Bolanca T & Curkovic L (2001) Simulta-neous determination of six inorganic anions in drinking water by nonsuppressed ion chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 918(2): 325–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty S, Dureja V, Bhattacharyya G, Maity S & Bhatta-charjee S (2002) Removal of arsenic from groundwater using low cost ferruginous manganese ore. Water Res.36(3): 625–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho BD & Fane AG (2002) Fouling transients in nominally sub-critical. ux operation of a membrane bioreactor. J. Memb. Sci.209: 391–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Choksuchart P, Heran M & Grasmick A (2002) Ultra ltration enhance by coagulation in an immersed membrane system. Desalination 145: 265–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Curkovic L, Cerjan-Stefanovic S & Filipan T (1996) Metal ion exchange by natural and modi ed zeolites. Water Res.31(6): 1379–1382

    Google Scholar 

  • Defrance L & Jaffrin MY (1999) Reversibility of fouling formed in activated sludge ltration. J. Membr. Sci.157: 73–84

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMarco MJ, SenGupta AK & Greenleaf JE (2002) Arsenic removal using a polymeric/inorganic hybrid sorbent. Water Res.37: 164–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Driehaus W, Srith R & Jekel M (1994) Oxidation of arse-nate(III)with manganese oxides in water treatment. Water Res.29(1): 279–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan J, Wilson F, Graham N & Tay JH (2002) Adsorption of humic acid by powdered activated carbon in saline water conditions. Desalination 151: 53–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Elizalde-Gonzalez MP, Mattusch J, Einicke WD & Wennrich R (2001) Sorption on natural solids for arsenic removal. Chem. Eng. J.81(1-3): 187–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Fane AG, Chang S & Chardon E (2002) Submerged hollow bre membrane module: Design options and operational considerations. Desalination 146(1-3): 231–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Field RW, Wu D, Howell JA & Gupta BB (1995) Critical. ux concept for micro ltration fouling. J. Membr. Sci.100: 259–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Frau F & Ardau (2003) Geochemical controls on arsenic distri-bution in the baccu locci stream catchment (Sardinia,Italy) a. ected by past mining. Appl. Geochem.18(9): 1373–1386

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez MPE, Mattusch J, Einicke WD & Wennrich R (2001) Sorption on natural solids for arsenic removal. Chem. Eng. J. 81: 187–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregor J (2001) Arsenic removal during conventional alumin-ium-based drinking-water treatment. Water Res.35(7): 1659–1664

    Google Scholar 

  • Han B, Runnells T, Zimbron J & Wickramasinghe R (2002) Arsenic removal from drinking water by. occulation and micro ltration. Desalination 145: 293–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiemstra T & Van Riemsdijk WH (1999) Surface structural ion adsorption modelling of competitive binding of oxyanions by metal (hydr)oxides. J. Coll. Interface Sci.210: 182–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong SP, Bae TH, Tak TM, Hong S & Randall A (2002) Fouling control in activated sludge submerged hollow ber membrane bioreactors. Desalination 143: 219–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain CK & Ali I (2000) Arsenic: occurrence,toxicity and speciation techniques. Water. Res.34 (17): 4304–4312

    Google Scholar 

  • Kartinen EO & Martin CJ (1995) An overview of arsenic removal processes. Desalination 103: 79–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Konieczny K & Klomfas G (2002) Using activated carbon to improve natural water treatment by porous membrane. Desalination 147: 109–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Korngold E, Belayev N & Aronov L (2001) Removal of arsenic from drinking water by anion exchangers. Desalination 141: 81–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Clech P, Je. erson B, Chang IS & Judd S (2003) Critical. ux determination by the. ux-step method in submerged mem-brane bioreactor. J. Membr. Sci.227: 81–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebeau T, Lelievre C, Buisson H, Cleret D, Venter LWV & Cote P (1998) Immersed membrane ltration for production of drinking water: Combination with PAC for NOM and SOCs removal. Desalination 117: 219–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee HJ, Amy G, Cho JW, Yoon YM, Moon SH & Kim IS (2001) Cleaning strategies for. ux recovery of an ultra ltra-tion membrane fouled by natural organic matter. Water. Res. 35(14): 3301–3308

    Google Scholar 

  • Liikanen R, Kuivila JY & Laukkanen R (2002) E. ciency of various chemical cleanings for nano ltration membrane fouled by conventionally-treated surface water. J. Membr. Sci. 195: 265–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu R, Huang X, Wang CW, Chen LJ & Qian Y (2000) Study on hydraulic characteristics in a submerged membrane bioreactor process. Process Biochem.36(3): 249–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen L, Deventer JSJ & Landi WM (1994) Factor a. ecting the mechanism of the adsorption of arsenic species on activated carbon. Miner. Eng.8(4/5): 557–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Malaysia Food Act (1983) Malaysian Ministry of Health, Kuala Lumpur

  • Meng X, Bang SB & Kor atis GP (2000) E. ect of silicate, sulfate,and carbonate on arsenic removal by ferric chloride. Water. Res.34(4): 1255–1261

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng X, Kor atis PG, Christodoulatos C & Bang S (2001) Treatment of arsenic in Bangladesh well water using a household co-precipitation and ltration system. Water. Res. 35(12)2805–2810

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgensen SB, Nielsen TM, Ujang Z & Tjell JC (2001) Distribution and health risk of arsenic related to abandoned tin-mining pools in Malaysia. In: The International Water Association Conference on Water and Wastewater Manage-ment for Developing Countries,29-31 October 2001,Kuala Lumpur,Malaysia (pp 110–115)

  • Mohammadi T, Madaeni SS & Moghadam MK (2002) Inves-tigation of membrane fouling. Desalination 153: 155–160

    Google Scholar 

  • NAS (National Academic of Science) (1999) Arsenic in Drink-ing Water. National Academy Press, Washington,DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nery JG, Mascarenhas YP & Cheetham AK (2003) A study of the highly crytelline,low silica,fully hydrated zeolite P ion exchanged with Mn,Cd,Pb,Sr,Ba)cations. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater.57: 229–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Ning RY (2002) Arsenic removal by reverse osmosis. Desali-nation 143: 237–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattanayak J, Mondal K, Mathew S & Lalvani SB (1999) A parametric evaluation of the removal of As(V)and As(III)by carbon-based adsorbents. Carbon 38: 589–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirbazari M, Ravindran V, Badriyha BN & Kim SH (1996). Hybrid membrane ltration process for leachate treatment. Water. Res. Sci.30(10): 2691–2706

    Google Scholar 

  • Roddick-Lanzilotta AJ, McQuillan AJ & Craw D (2002) Infrared spectroscopic characterisation of arsenate(V)ion adsorption from mine waters,macraes mine,New Zealand. Appl. Geochem.17(64): 445–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Saada A, Breeze D, Crouzet C, Cornu S & Baranger P (2003) Adsorption of arsenic(V)on kaolinite and on kaolinite-humic acid complexes. Chemosphere 51(8): 57–763

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez AG, Alastuey A & Querol X (1999) Heavy metal adsorption by di. erent materials: Application to the reme-diation of polluted soils. The Sci. Total Environ.242: 179–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato Y, Kang M, Kamei T & Magara Y (2002) Performance of nano ltration for arsenic removal. Water. Res. 36: 3371–3377

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo GT, Suzuki Y & Ohgaki S (1996) Biological powdered activated carbon (BPAC)micro ltration for wastewater reclamation and reuse. Desalination 106: 39–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu Y, Okuno YI, Uryu K, Ohtsubo S & Watanabe A (1996) Filtration characteristics of hollow ber micro ltra-tion membranes used in membrane bioreactor for domestic wastewater treatment. Water. Res.30(10): 2385–2392

    Google Scholar 

  • Smedley PL & Kinniburgh DG (2002) A review of the source, behavior and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Appl. Geochem.17(5): 517–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit B & Krishna R (2003) Molecular simulation in zeolite process design. Chem. Eng. Sci.58: 557–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson T, Judd S, Je. erson B & Brindle K (2000) Membrane Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment. IWA Publishing, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki TM, Bomani JO, Matsunaga H & Yokoyama T (2000) Preparation of porous resin loaded with crystalline hydrous zirconium oxide and its application to the removal of arsenic. Reactive Funct. Polymer 43(1-2): 165–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempel RN, Shevenell LA, Lechler P & Price J (2000) Geochemical modeling approach to predicting arsenic con-centrations in a Mine Pit Lake. Appl. Geochem.15(4): 475–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Thirunavukkarasu OS, Viraraghavan T, Subramanian KS & Tanjore S (2002) Organic arsenic removal from drinking water. Urban Water 4(4): 415–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng RL, Wu FC & Juang RS (2003) Liquid-phase adsorption of dyes and phenol using pinewood-based activated carbons. Carbon 41: 487–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Ueda T, Hata K & Kikuoka Y (1996) Treatment of domestic sewage from rural settlements by a membrane bioreactor. Water Sci. Technol.34(9): 189–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrijenhoek EM & Waypa JJ (2000) Arsenic removal from drinking water by a ''loose ''nano ltration membrane. Desalination 130(3): 265–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch AH, Lico MS & Hughes JL (1988) Arsenic in ground water of the western united states. Ground Water 26: 333–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie JA & Hering JG (1996) Adsorption of arsenic onto hydrous ferric oxide: E. ects of adsorbate/adsorbent ratio and co-occurring solutes. Coll. Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 107(20): 97–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson FH & Hawkins DB (1978) Arsenic in streams,stream sediments,and groundwater,fairbanks Areas,Alaska. Envi-ron. Geol.2: 195–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisniewski C, Grasmick A & Cruz AL (2000) Critical particle size in membrane bioreactors-case of a denitrifying bacterial suspension. J. Membr. Sci.178: 141–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu YH, Nakajima T & Ohki (2002) Adsorption and removal of arsenic(V)from drinking water by aluminum-loaded shirasu-zeolite. J. Hazardous Mater.92(3): 275–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang GJ & Liu ZZ (2003) Membrane fouling and cleaning in ultra ltration of wastewater from banknote printing works. J. Membr. Sci.211: 235–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Yang M & Huang X (2003) Arsenic removal with a Ce(IV)-doped iron oxide adsorbent. Chemosphere 51(9): 945–952

    Google Scholar 

  • Zorpas AA, Constantinides T, Vlyssides AG, Haralambous I & Loizidou M (1999) Heavy metal uptake by natural zeolite and metals partitioning sewage sludge compost. Biores. Technol.72: 113–119

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Environmental and Water Resource Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi, Malaysia, Malaysia

    Kuan-Seong Ng & Zaini Ujang

  2. UNESCO Centre for Membrane Science and Technology, School of Chemical Engineering and Industrial Chemistry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia

    Pierre Le-Clech

Authors
  1. Kuan-Seong Ng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zaini Ujang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pierre Le-Clech
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ng, KS., Ujang, Z. & Le-Clech, P. Arsenic Removal Technologies for Drinking Water Treatment. Re/Views in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology 3, 43–53 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RESB.0000040054.28151.84

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RESB.0000040054.28151.84

Search

Navigation