Abstract
The Discrepancy Hypothesis posits that childrenearly in the acquisition process read visually(holistically) and spell phonologically. Thisclaim was examined and rejected. Weinvestigated reading and spelling in Grade 1and Grade 2 children using controlled nonwordand word materials with a variety oforthographic patterns. While reading andspelling were strongly correlated even amongthe younger readers, discrepancies betweenperformance levels occurred in both directions. Children's responses were affected by wordcharacteristics and whether or not theyreceived school phonics instruction. Phonologically complex words, such as thosecontaining consonant clusters, wereparticularly difficult for Grade 1 children toread, while words that were difficult to spellcorrectly but not to read tended to havemultivalent mappings from sound to spelling.The generation of reading responses tospecially selected nonwords was affected byboth implicit and explicit phonological sourcesof knowledge. Orthographic knowledge gained inspelling did not always transfer to reading,and vice versa.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barr, R. (1975). The effect of instruction on pupil reading strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 10, 555–582.
Bosman, A.M.T. & Van Orden, G.C. (1997). Why spelling is more difficult than reading. In C.A. Perfetti, L. Rieben & M. Fayol (Eds.), Learning to spell (pp. 173–194). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bradley, L. & Bryant, P.E. (1979). The independence of reading and spelling in backward and normal readers. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 21, 504–514.
Bryant, P.E. & Bradley, L. (1980). Why children sometimes write words which they do not read. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 355–370). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Coltheart, M. & Rastle, K. (1994). Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1197–1211.
Connelly, V., Johnston, R.S. & Thompson, G.B. (1999). The influence of instructional approaches on reading procedures. In G.B. Thompson & T. Nicholson (Eds.), Learning to read: Beyond phonics and whole language (pp. 103–123). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Dunn, L.M. & Dunn, L.M. (1981). Peabody picture vocabulary test-revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Ehri, L. (1997). Learning to read and learning to spell are one and the same, almost. In C.A. Perfetti, L. Rieben & M. Fayol (Eds.), Learning to spell (pp. 237–269). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Elder, R.D. (1971). Oral reading achievement of Scottish and American children. Elementary School Journal, 71, 216–230.
Fletcher-Flinn, C.M. & Thompson, G.B. (2004). A mechanism of implicit lexicalized phono-logical recoding used concurrently with underdeveloped explicit letter-sound skills in both precocious and normal reading development. Cognition, 90, 303–335.
Frith, U. (1980). Unexpected spelling problems. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 495–515). London: Academic Press.
Glushko, R.J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading words aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 386–393.
Goswami, U. & Bryant, P.E. (1990). Phonological skills in learning to read. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
Gough, P.B., Juel, C. & Griffith, P.L. (1992). Reading, spelling, and the orthographic cipher. In P.B. Gough, L.C. Ehri & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 35–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
Jared, D., Seidenberg, M.S. & McRae, K. (1990). The basis of consistency effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 687–715.
Johnston, R.S. & Thompson, G.B. (1989). Is dependence on phonological information in children's reading a product of instructional approach? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 131–145.
Katz, L. & Frost, S. (2001). Phonology constrains the internal orthographic representation. Reading and Writing, 14, 297–332.
Kochnower, J., Richardson, E. & DiBenedetto, B. (1983). A comparison of the phonic decoding ability of normal and learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16, 348–351.
Krashen, S.D. (1992). The input hypothesis and its rivals. In N.C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 45–77). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Lesgold, A., Resnick, L.B. & Hammond, K. (1985). Learning to read: A longitudinal study of word skill development in two curricula. In G.E. MacKinnon & T.G. Waller (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 4; pp. 107–138). New York, NY: Academic Press.
New Zealand Department of Education (1985). Reading in junior classes. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Education.
Plaut, D.C., McClelland, J.L., Seidenberg, M.S. & Patterson, K.E. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56–115.
Richardson, E. & DiBenedetto, B. (1986). Decoding skills test. Parkton, MD: York Press.
Rosner, J. (1975). Helping children overcome learning difficulties.NewYork: Walker.
Shankweiler, D., Lundquist, E., Dreyer, L.G. & Dickinson, C.C. (1996). Reading and spelling difficulties in high school students: Causes and consequences. Reading and Writing, 8, 267–294.
Shankweiler, D. & Lundquist, E. (1992). On the relations between learning to spell and learning to read. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 179–192). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Sowden, P.T. & Stevenson, J. (1994). Beginning reading strategies in children experiencing contrasting teaching methods. Reading and Writing, 6, 109–123.
Stone, G.O., Vanhoy, M. & Van Orden, G.C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feed-forward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 337–359.
Taraban, R. & McClelland, J.L. (1987). Conspiracy effects in word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 608–631.
Thompson, G.B. (1993). Reading instruction for the initial years in New Zealand schools. In G.B. Thompson, W.E. Tunmer & T. Nicholson (Eds.), Reading acquisition processes (pp. 148–154). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Thompson, G.B., Cottrell, D.S. & Fletcher-Flinn, C.M. (1996). Sublexical orthographic-phonological relations early in the acquisition of reading: The Knowledge Sources account. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 62, 190–222.
Thompson, G.B. & Fletcher-Flinn, C.M. (1993). A theory of knowledge sources and proce-dures for reading acquisition. In G.B. Thompson, W.E. Tunmer & T. Nicholson (Eds.), Reading acquisition processes (pp. 20–73). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Thompson, G.B., Fletcher-Flinn, C.M. & Cottrell, D.S. (1999). Learning correspondences between letters and phonemes without explicit instruction. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 21–50.
Treiman, R. (1991). Children's spelling errors on syllable-initial consonant clusters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 346–360.
Treiman, R. (1993). Beginning to spell. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wilkinson, G.S. (1993). Wide range achievement test-3. Wilmington, DE: Wide Range Inc.
Ziegler, J.C., Montant, M. & Jacobs, A.M. (1997). The feedback consistency effect in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 533–554.
Zinna, D.R., Liberman, I.Y. & Shankweiler, D. (1986). Children's sensitivity to factors influencing vowel reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 465–480.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fletcher-Flinn, C.M., Shankweile, D. & Frost, S.J. Coordination of reading and spelling in early literacy development: An examination of the discrepancy hypothesis. Reading and Writing 17, 617–644 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000044297.85675.f5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000044297.85675.f5