Skip to main content
Log in

Coordination of reading and spelling in early literacy development: An examination of the discrepancy hypothesis

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Discrepancy Hypothesis posits that childrenearly in the acquisition process read visually(holistically) and spell phonologically. Thisclaim was examined and rejected. Weinvestigated reading and spelling in Grade 1and Grade 2 children using controlled nonwordand word materials with a variety oforthographic patterns. While reading andspelling were strongly correlated even amongthe younger readers, discrepancies betweenperformance levels occurred in both directions. Children's responses were affected by wordcharacteristics and whether or not theyreceived school phonics instruction. Phonologically complex words, such as thosecontaining consonant clusters, wereparticularly difficult for Grade 1 children toread, while words that were difficult to spellcorrectly but not to read tended to havemultivalent mappings from sound to spelling.The generation of reading responses tospecially selected nonwords was affected byboth implicit and explicit phonological sourcesof knowledge. Orthographic knowledge gained inspelling did not always transfer to reading,and vice versa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barr, R. (1975). The effect of instruction on pupil reading strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 10, 555–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosman, A.M.T. & Van Orden, G.C. (1997). Why spelling is more difficult than reading. In C.A. Perfetti, L. Rieben & M. Fayol (Eds.), Learning to spell (pp. 173–194). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, L. & Bryant, P.E. (1979). The independence of reading and spelling in backward and normal readers. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 21, 504–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P.E. & Bradley, L. (1980). Why children sometimes write words which they do not read. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 355–370). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M. & Rastle, K. (1994). Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1197–1211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, V., Johnston, R.S. & Thompson, G.B. (1999). The influence of instructional approaches on reading procedures. In G.B. Thompson & T. Nicholson (Eds.), Learning to read: Beyond phonics and whole language (pp. 103–123). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L.M. & Dunn, L.M. (1981). Peabody picture vocabulary test-revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. (1997). Learning to read and learning to spell are one and the same, almost. In C.A. Perfetti, L. Rieben & M. Fayol (Eds.), Learning to spell (pp. 237–269). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, R.D. (1971). Oral reading achievement of Scottish and American children. Elementary School Journal, 71, 216–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher-Flinn, C.M. & Thompson, G.B. (2004). A mechanism of implicit lexicalized phono-logical recoding used concurrently with underdeveloped explicit letter-sound skills in both precocious and normal reading development. Cognition, 90, 303–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. (1980). Unexpected spelling problems. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 495–515). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glushko, R.J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading words aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 386–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U. & Bryant, P.E. (1990). Phonological skills in learning to read. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P.B., Juel, C. & Griffith, P.L. (1992). Reading, spelling, and the orthographic cipher. In P.B. Gough, L.C. Ehri & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 35–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jared, D., Seidenberg, M.S. & McRae, K. (1990). The basis of consistency effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 687–715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R.S. & Thompson, G.B. (1989). Is dependence on phonological information in children's reading a product of instructional approach? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 131–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, L. & Frost, S. (2001). Phonology constrains the internal orthographic representation. Reading and Writing, 14, 297–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochnower, J., Richardson, E. & DiBenedetto, B. (1983). A comparison of the phonic decoding ability of normal and learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16, 348–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S.D. (1992). The input hypothesis and its rivals. In N.C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 45–77). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesgold, A., Resnick, L.B. & Hammond, K. (1985). Learning to read: A longitudinal study of word skill development in two curricula. In G.E. MacKinnon & T.G. Waller (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 4; pp. 107–138). New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Department of Education (1985). Reading in junior classes. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plaut, D.C., McClelland, J.L., Seidenberg, M.S. & Patterson, K.E. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, E. & DiBenedetto, B. (1986). Decoding skills test. Parkton, MD: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosner, J. (1975). Helping children overcome learning difficulties.NewYork: Walker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankweiler, D., Lundquist, E., Dreyer, L.G. & Dickinson, C.C. (1996). Reading and spelling difficulties in high school students: Causes and consequences. Reading and Writing, 8, 267–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankweiler, D. & Lundquist, E. (1992). On the relations between learning to spell and learning to read. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 179–192). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowden, P.T. & Stevenson, J. (1994). Beginning reading strategies in children experiencing contrasting teaching methods. Reading and Writing, 6, 109–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, G.O., Vanhoy, M. & Van Orden, G.C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feed-forward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 337–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taraban, R. & McClelland, J.L. (1987). Conspiracy effects in word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 608–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G.B. (1993). Reading instruction for the initial years in New Zealand schools. In G.B. Thompson, W.E. Tunmer & T. Nicholson (Eds.), Reading acquisition processes (pp. 148–154). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G.B., Cottrell, D.S. & Fletcher-Flinn, C.M. (1996). Sublexical orthographic-phonological relations early in the acquisition of reading: The Knowledge Sources account. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 62, 190–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G.B. & Fletcher-Flinn, C.M. (1993). A theory of knowledge sources and proce-dures for reading acquisition. In G.B. Thompson, W.E. Tunmer & T. Nicholson (Eds.), Reading acquisition processes (pp. 20–73). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G.B., Fletcher-Flinn, C.M. & Cottrell, D.S. (1999). Learning correspondences between letters and phonemes without explicit instruction. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 21–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. (1991). Children's spelling errors on syllable-initial consonant clusters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 346–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. (1993). Beginning to spell. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, G.S. (1993). Wide range achievement test-3. Wilmington, DE: Wide Range Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, J.C., Montant, M. & Jacobs, A.M. (1997). The feedback consistency effect in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 533–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinna, D.R., Liberman, I.Y. & Shankweiler, D. (1986). Children's sensitivity to factors influencing vowel reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 465–480.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fletcher-Flinn, C.M., Shankweile, D. & Frost, S.J. Coordination of reading and spelling in early literacy development: An examination of the discrepancy hypothesis. Reading and Writing 17, 617–644 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000044297.85675.f5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:READ.0000044297.85675.f5

Navigation