Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Finding a useful conceptual basis for enhancing the quality of life of nursing home residents

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article it is depicted that before nursing home staff can effectively contribute to optimising the quality of life (QOL) of nursing home residents, it has to be clear what exactly QOL is and how it can be enhanced. The aim is to identify a QOL framework that provides tools for optimising QOL and can form the basis for the development of guidelines for QOL enhancement. For that purpose, a framework should meet three basic criteria:(1) it should be based on assumptions about comprehensive QOL of human beings in general; (2) it should clearly describe the contribution of each dimension to QOL and identify relationships between the dimensions; (3) it should take individual preferences into account. After the criteria are defined, frameworks identified from a literature search are discussed and evaluated according to these criteria. The most suitable framework appears to be the QOL framework of the theory of Social Production Functions. The implications of this framework in understanding the QOL of nursing home residents are described and recommendations for further research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Birren JE, Lubben JE, Rowe JC, Deutchman DE. The Concept and Measurement of Quality of Life in the Frail Elderly. San Diego: Academic Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lawton MP. A multidimensional view of quality of life in frail elders. In: Birren JE, Lubben JE, Rowe JC, Deutchman DE (eds), The Concept and Measurement of Quality of Life in Frail Elders, San Diego: Academic Press, 1991; 3-27.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Faulk LE. Quality of life factors in board and care homes for the elderly: A hierarchical model. Adult Foster Care J 1988; 2: 100-117.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goode DA, Hogg J. Towards an understanding of holistic quality of life in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. In: Goode DA (ed.), Quality of Life for Persons with Disabilities: International Perspectives and Issues, Cambridge, MA, US: Brookline Books, 1994; 197-207.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kivnick HQ. Everyday mental health: A guide to assessing life strengths. Generations 1993; 17: 13-20.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Green S, Cooper BA. Occupation as a quality of life constituent: A nursing home perspective. Br J Occupational Ther 2000; 63: 17-24.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ball MM, Whittington FJ, Perkins MM, et al. Quality of life in assisted living facilities: Viewpoints of residents. J App Gerontol 2000; 19: 304-325.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Albrecht GL, De Vlieger PJ. The disability paradox: High quality of life against all odds. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48: 977-988.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kempen GIJM, Brilman EI, Ormel J. Groningen Longitudinal Aging Study: Een onderzoek naar het dagelijks functioneren, het welbevinden en de zorgbehoefte van ouderen./The Groningen Longitudinal Aging Study (GLAS) on functional status, well-being and need of care: Objectives, design and preliminary results. Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie 1998; 29: 141-149.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ormel J, Lindenberg S, Steverink N, Vonkor. M. Quality of life and social production functions: A framework for understanding health effects. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45: 1051-1063.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Raphael D, Brown I, Renwick R, Rootman I. Quality of life: What are the implications for health promotion? Am J Health Behav 1997; 21: 118-128.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Erikson EH, Erikson JM, Kivnick H. Vital Involvement in Old Age. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lawton MP. Environment and other determinants of well-being in older people. Gerontologist 1983; 4: 349-357.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lawton MP. Assessing quality of life in Alzheimer disease research. Alz Dis Assoc Dis 1997; 11(Suppl 6): 91-99.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lawton MP. Quality of life in Alzheimer disease. Alz Dis Assoc Dis 1994; 8: 138-150.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Maslow AH. Toward a Psychology of Being. 2nd ed. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tyne A. Measuring quality of life in residential services for mentally handicapped people. In: Robertson A, Osborn A (eds), Planning to Care: Social Policy and the Quality of Life, Aldershot, England: Gower Publishing Company, 1985; 77-88.

    Google Scholar 

  18. McAdams DP. The Person: An Introduction to Personality Psychology. 2nd ed. Orlando: Harcourt Brace & Company, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Maslow AH. Motivation and Personality. 2nd ed. New York: Harper & Row, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hughes B. Quality of life. In: Peace SM (ed.), Researching Social Gerontology: Concepts, Methods and Issues, London: SAGE, 1990; 46-58.

    Google Scholar 

  21. George LK, Bearon LB. Quality of Life in Older Persons: Meaning and Measurement. New York: Human Sciences Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Katz S, Gurland BJ. Science of quality of life in elders: Challenge and opportunity. In: Birren JE, Lubben JE, Rowe JC, Deutchman DE (eds), The Concept and Measurement of Quality of Life in the Frail Elderly, San Diego: Academic Press, 1991; 335-343.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gurland B, Katz S. Quality of life and mental disorders of elders. In: Katschnig H, Freeman H, Sartorius N (eds), Quality of Life in Mental Disorders, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1997: 193-212.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Scheibel AB, Morgan DG, Grady CL, Rapoport SI, Gurland B, Katz S. Neuroscience and aging. In: Birren JE, Sloane RB, Cohen GD, et al. (eds), Handbook of Mental Health and Aging, 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press, 1992; 147-248.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lindenberg S. The paradox of privatization in consumption. In: Diekman A, Mitter P (eds), Paradoxical Effects of Social Behavior, Heidelberg/Wien: Physica-Verlag, 1986; 297-310.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lindenberg S. Continuities in the theory of social production functions. In: Ganzeboom H, Lindenberg S (eds), Verklarende sociologie: opstellen voor Reinhard Wippler [Explanatory Sociology: Essays for Reinhard Wippler], Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers, 1996; 169-184.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Steverink N. When and why frail elderly people give up independent living: The Netherlands as an example. Ageing Soc 2001; 21: 45-69.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Steverink N, Lindenberg S, Ormel J. Towards understanding successful ageing: Patterned change in resources and goals. Ageing Soc 1998; 18: 441-467.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ormel J, Lindenberg S, Steverink N, Verbrugge L. Subjective well-being and social production functions. Soc Indic Res 1999; 46: 61-90.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bruggen A van. Individual Production of Social Wellbeing: An Exploratory Study. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Eijk L van. Activity and Well-being in the Elderly. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nieboer AP. Life events and well-being: A prospective Study on Changes in Well-being of Elderly People due to a Serious Illness Event or Death of the Spouse. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lindenberg S. Social rationality versus rational egoism. In: Turner JH (ed.), Handbook of Sociological Theory, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2001; 635-668.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Feil N. Validation: An empathic approach to the care of dementia. Clin Gerontol 1989; 8: 89-94.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Feil N. Validation therapy with late-onset dementia populations. In: Jones GMM, Miesen BML (eds), Caregiving in Dementia: Research and Applications, London/New York: Routledge, 1992; 199-218.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rossaert I. Reminiscentie: Leven en werken met herinneringen. Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie 1989; 20: 167-168.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Achterberg I, Kok W, Salentijn C. 'snoezelen': A new way of communicating with the severly demented elderly. In: Jones GMM, Miesen BML (eds), Caregiving in Dementia, Vol 2, London/New York: Routledge, 1997; 119-129.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Dröes RM. In Beweging: Over Psychosociale Hulpverlening aan Demente Ouderen. Utrecht: De Tijdstroom, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Finnema EJ, Dröes RM, Ribbe MW, van Tilburg W. The effects of emotion oriented approaches in the care for persons suffering from dementia: A review of the literature. Int J Geriatr Psych 2000; 15: 141-161.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Teri L, Logsdon RG. Identifying pleasant activities for Alzheimer's disease patients: The pleasant events schedule-AD. The Gerontologist 1991; 31: 124-127.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nursing Home Medicine, VU University Medical Centre/Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    D.L. Gerritsen, M.E. Ooms & M.W. Ribbe

  2. Departments of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    N. Steverink

Authors
  1. D.L. Gerritsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. Steverink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M.E. Ooms
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M.W. Ribbe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gerritsen, D., Steverink, N., Ooms, M. et al. Finding a useful conceptual basis for enhancing the quality of life of nursing home residents. Qual Life Res 13, 611–624 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QURE.0000021314.17605.40

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QURE.0000021314.17605.40

Search

Navigation