Skip to main content
Log in

A Model for Agro-Economic Analysis of Soil pH Mapping

  • Published:
Precision Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Core soil sampling followed by laboratory analysis is the traditional method used to map soil pH prior to variable rate application (VRA) of lime on cropland. A recently developed automated soil sampling system capable of measuring soil pH on-the-go has significantly increased sampling resolution. However, adoption of such systems must be justified economically. This paper presents a method for assessing the economic benefit from automated mapping of soil pH prior to variable rate lime application. In this work, geostatistical, agronomic, and economic methods were used to generate a comprehensive numerical model for quantitative assessment of the net return over cost of liming for different lime management strategies. The strategies included: automated pH mapping, manual grid soil sampling, and whole field sampling used in combination with either variable or fixed rate liming. The model was demonstrated using a simulated field with known average pH and semivariogram model. The analysis showed the largest benefit ($6.13ha−1year−1) from using VRA with automated soil pH mapping versus VRA based on 1ha (2.5acres) manual grid point sampling for the selected simulated field conditions. A sensitivity analysis demonstrated that for a wide range of field conditions and crop prices, VRA plus automated mapping promises higher relative benefits than VRA based on either manual grid point or grid cell sampling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamchuk, V. I. 2000. Automated Mapping of Soil pH, Potassium and Mechanical Impedance for Site-Specific Management. Ph.D. Thesis (Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Adamchuk, V. I. and Morgan, M. T. 1999. Evaluation of automated soil pH mapping. ASAE Paper No. 99-1100. In: Presented at the 1999 ASAE/CSAE-SGCR Annual International Meeting (Toronto, Ontario, Canada).

  • Adamchuk, V. I., Morgan, M. T. and Ess, D. R. 1999. An automated sampling system for measuring soil pH. Transactions of the ASAE 42(4), 885–891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, C. A. 1993. Soil Fertility Evaluation and Control (Levis Publishers, London, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bongiovanni, R. and Lowenberg-DeBoer, J. 2000. Economics of variable rate lime in Indiana. Precision Agriculture 2(1), 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgelt, S. C., Searcy, S. W., Stout, B. A. and Mulla, D. J. 1994. Spatially variable liming rates: A method for determination. Transactions of the ASAE 37(5), 1499–1507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouder, S. M. and Lowenberg-DeBoer, J. M. 2000. Managing long-term soil fertility. In: Precision Farming Profitability, edited by J. Lowenberg-DeBoer and K. Erickson (Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA), p. 30–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouder, S. M. 1999. Applying site-specific tools in soil fertility research and developing management information for variable rate technologies. In: Presented at the 1999 Information Agriculture Conference (Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA).

  • Cambardella, C. A., Moorman, T. B., Novak, J. M., Parkin, T. B., Karlen, D. L., Turco, R. F. and Konopka, A. E. 1994. Field-scale variability of soil properties in Central Iowa soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 58, 1501–1511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay, D. E., Carlson, C. G., Chang, J., Clay, S. A., Malo, D. D., Ellsbury, M. M. and Lee, J. 1999. Systematic evaluation of precision farming soil sampling requirements. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of Precision Agriculture, edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust and W. E. Larsen (ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), p. 253–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conyers, M. K. and Davey, B. G. 1990. The variability of pH in acid soils of the southern highlands of New South Wales. Journal of Soil Science 150(4), 695–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havlin, J. L., Beaton, J. D., Tisdale, S. L. and Nelson, W. L. 1999. Soil fertility and fertilizers. In: An Introduction to Nutrient Management. 6th edn (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochman, Z., Godyn, D. L. and Scott, B. J. 1989. The integration of data on lime use by modeling. In: Soil Acidity and Plant Growth, edited by A. D. Robson (Academic Press Australia, Sydney, Australia), p. 265–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeft, R. G., Peck, T. R. and Boone, L. V. 1996. Soil testing and fertility. In: Illinois Agronomy Handbook 1995–1996, Circular 1333, (Cooperative Extension Service, College of Agriculture, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, USA), p. 70–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaaks, E. H. and Srivastava, R. M. 1989. Applied Geostatistics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, USA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenberg-DeBoer, J. M. and Swinton, S. M. 1997. Economics of site-specific management in agronomic crops. In: The State of Site-Specific Management for Agriculture, edited by F. T. Pierce and E. J. Sadler (ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), p. 369–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, E. O. 1982. Soil pH and lime requirement. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Agronomy Monograph No. 9, 2nd edn, edited by A. L. Page, R. H. Miller and D. R. Keeney (ASA-SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), p. 199–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mengel, D. B. 1997. Basic concepts of soil acidity and liming. In: Proceedings of the 27th North Central Extension-Industry Soil Fertility Conference, Vol. 13 (Potash and Phosphate Institute, Brookings, South Dakota, USA), p. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulla, D. J. 1991. Using geostatistics and GIS to manage spatial patterns in soil fertility. In: Automated Agriculture for the 21st Century. Proceedings of the 1991 Symposium. ASAE Publication 11-91 (ASAE, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA), p. 336–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulla, D. J. 1993. Mapping and managing spatial patterns in soil fertility and crop yield. In: Soil Specific Crop Management, edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust and W. E. Larsen (ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), p. 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, J. T. 1996. Lime requirement. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3. Chemical Methods. Book Series No. 5 (SSSA-ASA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), p. 491–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonka, S. T., Bauer, M. E., Cherry, E. T., Colburn, J. W., Heimlich, R. E., Joseph, D. A., Leboeuf, J. B., Lichtenberg, E., Mortensen, D. A., Searcy, S. W., Ustin, S. L. and Ventura, S. J. 1997. Precision Agriculture in the 21st Century. Geospatial and Information Technologies in Crop Management. Committee on Assessing Crop Yield: Site-Specific Farming, Information Systems, and Research Opportunities (Board of Agriculture, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudduth, K. A., Hummel, J. W. and Birrel, S. J. 1997. Sensors for site-specific management. In: The State of Site-Specific Management for Agriculture, edited by F. T. Pierce and E. J. Sadler (ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), p. 183–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitosh, M. L., Johnson, J. W. and Mengel, D. B. 1995. Tri-State Fertilizer Recommendations for Corn, Soybean, Wheat and Alfalfa. Extension Bulletin E-2567 (Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Warrick, A. W., Myers, D. E. and Nielsen, D. R. 1986. Geostatistical methods applied to soil science. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. Agronomy Monograph No. 9. 2nd edn (ASA-SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), p. 53–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, M. E. and Brown, J. R. 1998. pH and lime requirement. In: Recommended Chemical Soil Test Procedures for the North Central Region, edited by J. R. Brown (North Central Regional Publication No. 221 (Revised), Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station, Columbia, Missouri, USA), p. 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollenhaupt, N. C., Mulla, D. J. and Gotway Crawford, C. A. 1997. Soil sampling and interpolation techniques for mapping spatial variability of soil properties. In: The State of Site-Specific Management for Agriculture, edited by F. T. Pierce and E. J. Sadler (ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), p. 19–53.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adamchuk, V.I., Morgan, M.T. & Lowenberg-Deboer, J.M. A Model for Agro-Economic Analysis of Soil pH Mapping. Precision Agriculture 5, 111–129 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PRAG.0000022357.28154.eb

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PRAG.0000022357.28154.eb

Navigation