Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling the Roles of Craft Production in Ancient Political Economies

  • Published:
Journal of Archaeological Research Aims and scope

Abstract

Ongoing debates over the significance of specialized production in ancient political economies frequently hinge on questions of whether elites or commoners controlled craft manufactures and whether the material or ideological import of these production processes was more significant in deciding power contests. Though long recognized, such queries were traditionally answered in relatively straightforward economic terms. Recently, these time-honored approaches have been questioned. An ever increasing number of authors are promoting varied takes on the causal linkages between political forms and processes, on the one hand, and patterns of production, distribution, and use of craft goods, on the other. The literature generated by these discussions is extensive, vibrant, and often confusing. Rather than trying to synthesize all reports and essays dealing with specialized manufacture, this paper highlights general interpretive trends that underlie and structure current debates. The concluding section offers suggestions for how studies of relations among crafts, power, and social heterogeneity might be pursued profitably in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES CITED

  • Abercrombie, N., Hill, S., and Turner, B. (1980). The Dominant Ideology Thesis, George Allen and Unwin, LG0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (1986). Introduction: Commodities and the politics of value. In Appadurai, A. (ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0, pp. 3-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, D. (1993). Ecology and Ceramic Production in an Andean Community, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, D. (1985). Ceramic Theory and Cultural Process, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, J. (1993). Labor and the rise of complex hunter-gatherers. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 12: 75-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, J. (1995). Social inequality, marginalization, and economic process. In Price, T. D., and Feinman, G. (eds.), Foundations of Social Inequality, Plenum, New York, pp. 87-103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, J. (1996). The archaeology of complex hunter-gatherers. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 3: 77-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, J., and Munns, A. (1994). Independent or attached specialization: The organization of shell bead production in California. Journal of Field Archaeology 21: 473-489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baines, J., and Yoffee, N. (1998). Order, legitimacy, and wealth in ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia. In Feinman, G., and Marcus, J. (eds.), Archaic States, School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, NM, pp. 199-260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baines, J., and Yoffee, N. (2000). Order, legitimacy, and wealth: Setting the terms. In Richards, J., and Van Buren, M. (eds.), Order, Legitimacy, and Wealth in Ancient States, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0, pp. 13-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balandier, G. (1970). Political Anthropology, Penguin, Middlesex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, F. (1969). Introduction. In Barth, F. (ed.), Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference, Little, Brown, Boston, pp. 9-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayman, J. (1996). Shell ornament consumption in a Classic Hohokam platform mound community center. Journal of Field Archaeology 23: 403-420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayman, J. (2002). Hohokam craft economies and the materialization of power. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 9: 65-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernbeck, R. (1995). Lasting alliances and emerging competition: Economic developments in early Mesopotamia. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 14: 1-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanton, R., and Feinman, G. (1984). The Mesoamerican world system American Anthropologist 86: 673-682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanton, R. E, Feinman, G., Kowalewski, S. A., and Peregrine, P. N. (1996). A dual-processual theory for the evolution of Mesoamerican civilization. Current Anthropology 37: 1-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice, R. Nice (trans.) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1979). Symbolic power. Critique of Anthropology 4: 77-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowser, B, (2000). From pottery to politics: An ethnoarchaeological study of political factionalism, ethnicity, and domestic pottery style in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7: 219-248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumfiel, E. M. (1987). Elite and utilitarian crafts in the Aztec state. In Brumfiel, E., and Earle, T. (eds.), Specialization, Exchange, and Complex Societies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0, pp. 102-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumfiel, E. (1992). Breaking and entering the ecosystem: Gender, class, and faction steal the show. American Anthropologist 94: 551-567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumfiel, E. (1996). Comment on, Agency, ideology, and power in archaeological theory, a special section of Current Anthropology 37: 48-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumfiel, E. (1998). The multiple identities of Aztec craft specialists. In Costin, C., and Wright, R. (eds.), Craft and Social Identity, Archeological Papers No. 8, American Anthropological Association, Washington, DA0, pp. 145-152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumfiel, E. (2000). The politics of high culture: Issues of worth and rank. In Richards, J., and Van Buren, M. (eds.), Order, Legitimacy, and Wealth in Ancient States, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0, pp. 131-139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumfiel, E., and Earle, T. (1987). Specialization, exchange, and complex societies: An introduction. In Brumfiel, E., and Earle, T. (eds.), Specialization, Exchange, and Complex Societies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0, pp. 1-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumfiel, E., and Fox, J. (eds.) (1994). Factional Competition and Political Development in the New World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J. (1964). Interaction spheres in prehistory. In Caldwell, J., and Hall, R. (eds.), Hopewellian Studies, Scientific Papers No. 12, Illinois State Museum, Springfield, pp. 134-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, C. (1995). A unified middle-range theory of artifact design. In Carr, C., and Neitzel, J. (eds.), Style, Society, and Person, Plenum, New York, pp. 171-258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlton, C. O. (1994). Plebian and patrician: Contrasting patterns of production and distribution in the Aztec figurine and lapidary industries. In Hodge, M., and Smith, M. (eds.), Economies and Polities in the Aztec Realm, Institute of Mesoamerican Studies, State University of New York, Albany, and University of Texas Press, Austin, pp. 195-219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlton, C. O., Charlton, T., and Nichols, D. (1993). Aztec household-based craft production: Archaeological evidence from the city-state of Otumba, Mexico. In Santley, R., and Hirth, K. (eds.), Prehispanic Domestic Units in Western Mesoamerica, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 147-171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlton, T. (1994). Economic heterogeneity and state expansion: The northeastern Basin of Mexico during the Late Postclassic Period. In Hodge, M., and Smith, M. (eds.), Economies and Polities in the Aztec Realm, Institute of Mesoamerican Studies, State University of New York, Albany, and University of Texas Press, Austin, pp. 221-256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase-Dunn, C., and Hall, T. (eds.) (1991). Core/Periphery Relations in Precapitalist Worlds, Westview, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childe, V. G. (1942). What Happened in History, Pelican Books, Hammondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childe, V. G. (1950). The urban revolution. The Town Planning Review 21: 3-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childe, V. G. (1956). Man Makes Himself, Watts, London (originally published in 1936).

    Google Scholar 

  • Childs, J. T., and Kilbick, D. (1993). Indigenous African metallurgy: Nature and culture. Annual Review of Anthropology 22: 317-337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. E. (1986). From mountains to molehills: A critical review of Teotihuacan's obsidian industry. Research in Economic Anthropology Supplement 2: 23-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. E. (1996). Craft specialization and Olmec civilization. In Wailes, B. (ed.), Craft Specialization and Social Evolution: In Memory of V. Gordon Childe, University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, pp. 187-199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. E., and Blake, M. (1994). The power of prestige: Competitive generosity and the emergence of rank societies in lowland Mesoamerica. In Brumfiel, E., and Fox, J. (eds.), Factional Competition and Political Development in the New World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0, pp. 17-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. E., and Parry, W. (1990). Craft specialization and cultural complexity. Research in Economic Anthropology 12: 289-346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, C. (1993). Archaeological approaches to the political economy of non-stratified societies. In Schiffer, M. (ed.), Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 5, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 43-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. (1979). Political symbolism. Annual Review of Anthropology 8: 87-113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. (1978). Ethnicity: The problem and focus in anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology 7: 379-403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, S. (2002). Getting closer to the source: Using ethnoarchaeology to find ancient pottery making in the Naco valley, Honduras. Latin American Antiquity 13: 401-417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costin, C. (1991). Craft specialization: Issues in defining, documenting, and explaining the organization of production. In Schiffer, M. (ed.), Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 3, University of Arizona Press, TU0, pp. 1-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costin, C. (1996). Craft production and mobilizaton strategies in the Inka Empire. In Wailes, B. (ed.), Craft Specialization and Social Evolution: In Memory of V. Gordon Childe, University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, pp. 211-225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costin, C. (1998). Introduction: Craft and social identity. In Costin, C., and Wright, R. (eds.), Craft and Social Identity, Archeological Papers No. 8, American Anthropological Association, Washington, DA0, pp. 3-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costin, C. (2001). Craft production systems. In Feinman, G., and Price, T. D. (eds.), Archaeology at the Millennium: A Sourcebook, Kluwer Academic, New York, pp. 273-327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costin, C., and Earle, T. (1989). Status distinction and legitimation of power as reflected in changing patterns of consumption in late Prehispanic Peru. American Antiquity 54: 691-714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costin, C., and Hagstrum, M. (1995). Standardization, labor investment, skill, and organization of ceramic production in late Prehistoric highland Peru. American Antiquity 60: 619-639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costin, C., and Wright, R. (eds.) (1998). Craft and Social Identity, Archeological Papers No. 8, American Anthropological Association, Washington, DA0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crumley, C. (1979). Three locational models: An epistemological assessment for anthropology and archaeology. In Schiffer, M. (ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 2, Academic Press, New York, pp. 141-173.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Altroy, T., and Earle, T. (1985). Staple finance, wealth finance, and storage in the Inka political economy. Current Anthropology 26: 187-206.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMarrais, E., Castillo, L. J., and Earle, T. (1996). Ideology, materialization, and power strategies. Current Anthropology 37: 15-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Montmollin, O. (1989). The Archaeology of Political Structure: Settlement Analysis in a Classic Maya Polity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobres, M.-C. (1995). Gender and prehistoric technology: On the social agency of technical strategies. World Archaeology 27: 25-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobres, M.-C., and Hoffman, C. (1995). Social agency and the dynamics of prehistoric technology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1: 211-258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupre, G., and Rey, P. (1973). Reflections on the pertinence of a theory of the history of exchange. Economy and Society 2: 131-163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, T. (1987). Specialization and the production of wealth: Hawaiian chiefdoms and the Inka empire. In Brumfiel, E., and Earle, T. (eds.), Specialization, Exchange, and Complex Societies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0, pp. 64-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, T. (1991). The evolution of chiefdoms. In Earle, T. (ed.), Chiefdoms: Power, Economy and Ideology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0, pp. 1-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, T. (1994). Wealth finance in the Inka empire: Evidence from the Chalchaqui Valley, Argentina. American Antiquity 59: 443-460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, T. (1997). How Chiefs Come to Power: The Political Economy of Prehistory, Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, T. (2001). Economic support of Chaco Canyon society. American Antiquity 66: 26-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, T., and D'Altroy, T. (1989). The political economy of the Inka empire: The archaeology of power and finance. In Lamberg-Karlovsky, C. C. (ed.), Archaeological Thought in America, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0, pp. 183-204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekholm, K. (1972). Power and Prestige: The Rise and Fall of the Kongo Kingdom, SKRIV Service AB, Uppsala, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekholm, K. (1978). External change and the transformation of central African social systems. In Friedman, J., and Rowlands, M. (eds.), The Evolution of Social Systems, University of Pittsburgh Press, PU0, pp. 115-136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, T. (1997). Reflections from the countryside on Cahokian hegemony. In Pauketat, T., and Emerson, T. (eds.), Cahokia: Domination and Ideology in the Missisippian World, University of Nebraska Press, LU0, pp. 167-189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emberling, G. (1999). The value of tradition: The development of social identities in early Mesopotamian states. In Robb, J. (ed.), Material Symbols: Culture and Economy in Prehistory, Occasional Papers No. 26, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 277-301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinman, G. (1991). Demography, surplus, and inequality: Early political formations in highland Mesoamerica. In Earle, T. (ed.), Chiefdoms: Power, Economy, and Ideology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0, pp. 229-262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinman, G. (1995). The emergence of inequality: A focus on strategies and process. In Price, T. D., and Feinman, G. (eds.), Foundations of Social Inequality, Plenum, New York, pp. 255-279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinman, G., and Neitzel, J. (1984). Too many types: An overview of sedentary prestate societies in the Americas. In Schiffer, M. (ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 7, Academic Press, New York, pp. 39-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinman, G., and Nicholas, L. (2000). High-intensity househld-scale production in ancient Mesoamerica: A perspective from Ejutla, Oaxaca. In Feinman, G., and Manzanilla, L. (eds.), Cultural Evolution: Contemporary Viewpoints, Kluwer Academic, New York, pp. 119-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, Y., and Mansbach, R. (1996). Polities: Authority, Identities, and Change, University of South Carolina Press, Co0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, K., and Marcus, J. (eds.) (1983). The Cloud People: Divergent Evolution of the Zapotec and Mixtec Civilizations, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foias, A. (2002). At the crossroads: The economic basis of political power in the Petexbatun region. In Masson, M., and Freidel, D. (eds.), Ancient Maya Political Economies, Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, CA, pp. 223-248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotiadis, M. (1999). Comparability, equivalency, and contestation. In Robb, J. (ed.), Material Symbols: Culture and Economy in Prehistory, Occasional Papers No. 26, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 385-398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenstein, D., and Rowlands, M. (1978). The internal structure and regional context of early Iron Age society in southwestern Germany. Bulletin of the Institute of Archaeology 15: 73-112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidel, D. (1986). Maya warfare: An example of peer polity interaction. In Renfrew, C., and Cherry, J. (eds.), Peer Polity Interaction and Socio-Political Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0, pp. 93-108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidman, J. (1982). Catastrophe and continuity in social evolution. In Renfrew, C., Rowlands, M., and Segraves, B. (eds.), Theory and Explanation in Archaeology: The Southampton Conference, Academic Press, New York, pp. 175-196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J., and Rowlands, M. (1978). Notes toward an epigenetic model of the evolution of civilization. In Friedman, J., and Rowlands, M. (eds.), The Evolution of Social Systems, University of Pittsburgh Press, PU0, pp. 201-276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, R. (1981). Pottery production-distribution systems in the southern Maya lowlands. In Howard, H., and Morris, E. (eds.), Production and Distribution: A Ceramic Viewpoint, BAR International Series, No. 120, British Archaeological Reports Oxford, pp. 145-167.

  • Gailey, C. (1987). Culture wars: Resistance to state formation. In Patterson, T., and Gailey, C. (eds.), Power Relations and State Formation, American Anthropological Association, Washington, DA0, pp. 35-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In Geertz, C. (ed.), The Interpretation of Cultures, Basic Books, New York, pp. 3-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, D. (1996). Death of a salesman: Childe's itinerant craftsman in light of present knowledge of late Prehistoric craft production. In Wailes, B. (ed.), Craft Specialization and Social Evolution: In Memory of V. Gordon Childe, University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, pp. 107-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, University of California Press, BU0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, S. (1999). Olmec thrones as ancestral altars: The two sides of power. In Robb, J. (ed.), Material Symbols: Culture and Economy in Prehistory, Occasional Papers No. 26, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 224-253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, A. (1991). Trajectories towards social complexity in the later prehistory of the Mediterranean. In Earle, T. (ed.), Chiefdoms: Power, Economy, and Ideology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 146-168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godelier, M. (1977). Perspectives in Marxist Anthropology, Robert Brain, translator, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosselain, O. (1993). Technology and style: Potters and pottery among Babia of Cameroon. Man 27: 559-586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosselain, O. (2000). Materializing identities: An African perspective. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7: 187-217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, E. (2002). Perspectives on economy and theory. In Masson, M., and Freidel, D. (eds.), Ancient Maya Political Economies, Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, CA, pp. 398-418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagstrum, M. (1988). Ceramic production in the central Andes, Peru: An archaeological and ethnographic comparison. In Kolb, C., and Lackey, L. M. (eds.), A Pot for all Reasons, A Special Publication of Cerámica de Cultura Maya, Temple University, Philadelphia, pp. 127-145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagstrum, M. (2001). Household production in Chaco Canyon society. American Antiquity 66: 47-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashida, F. (1999). Style, technology, and state production: Inka pottery manufacture in the Leche valley, Peru. Latin American Antiquity 10: 337-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, B. (1994). Village approaches to complex societies. In Schwartz, G., and Falconer, S. (eds.), Archaeological Views from the Countryside: Village Communities in Early Complex Societies, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DS0, pp. 198-206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, B. (1995). Pathways to power: Principles for creating socioeconomic inequalities. In Price, T. D., and Feinman, G. (eds.), Foundations of Social Inequality, Plenum, New York, pp. 15-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, B. (1998). Practical and prestige technologies: The evolution of material systems. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 5: 1-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, B. (2001). Richman, poorman, beggarman, chief: The dynamics of social inequality. In Feinman, G., and Price, T. D. (eds.), Archaeology at the Millennium: A Sourcebook, Kluwer Academic, New York, pp. 231-272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendon, J. (1999). Multiple sources of prestige and the social evaluation of women in prehispanic Mesoamerica. In Robb, J. (ed.), Material Symbols: Culture and Economy in Prehistory, Occasional Papers No. 26, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 257-276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1979). Economic and social stress and material cultural patterning. American Antiquity 44: 446-454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1982). Symbols in Action: Ethnoarchaeological Studies of Material Culture, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1986). Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, M., and Smith, M. (eds.) (1994). Economies and Polities in the Aztec Realm, Institute of Mesoamerican Studies, State University of New York, Albany, and University of Texas Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosler, D. (1994). The Sounds and Colors of Power: The Sacred Metallurgical Technology of Ancient West Mexico, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inomata, T. (2001). The power and ideology of artistic creation. Current Anthropology 42: 321-344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, R. (2000). High culture, Mesoamerican civilization, and the Classic Maya tradition. In Richards, J., and Van Buren, M. (eds.), Order, Legitimacy, and Wealth in Ancient States, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0, pp. 64-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenoyer, J. (2000). Wealth and socioeconomic hierarchies of the Indus Valley civilization. In Richards, J., and Van Buren, M. (eds.), Order, Legitimacy, and Wealth in Ancient States, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0, pp. 88-109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. (2001). Elite strategies and the spread of technological innovations: The spread of iron in the Bronze Age societies of Denmark and southern Korea. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 20: 442-478.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, E., and Potter, D. (1994). Small sites in prehistoric Maya socioeconomic organization: A perspective from Colha, Belize. In Schwartz, G., and Falconer, S. (eds.), Archaeological Views from the Countryside: Village Communities in Early Complex Societies, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DS0, pp. 64-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalewski, S., Feinman, G., Finsten, L., Blanton, R., and Nicholas, L. (1989). Monte Alban's Hinterland, Part II: The Prehispanic Settlement Patterns in Tlacolula, Etla, and Ocotlán, the Valley of Oaxaca, Mexico, Memoirs No. 23, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, C. (1985). Ceramic ethnoarchaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 14: 77-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristiansen, K. (1991). Chiefdom, states, and systems of social evolution. In Earle, T. (ed.), Chiefdoms: Power, Economy, and Ideology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0, pp. 16-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopytoff, I. (1986). The cultural biography of things: Commoditization as process. In Appadurai, A. (ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0, pp. 64-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamberg-Karlovsky, C. C. (1993). The biography of an object: The Inter-Cultural style vessels of the Third Millennium B. C. In Luber, S., and Kingery W. D. (eds.), History from Things: Essays on Material Culture, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DS0, pp. 270-292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larick, R. (1991). Warriors and blacksmiths: Mediating identity in east African spears. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 10: 299-331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lass, B. (1998). Crafts, chiefs, and commoners: Production and control in precontact Hawai'i. In Costin, C., and Wright, R. (eds.), Craft and Social Identity, Archeological Papers No. 8, American Anthropological Association, Washington, DA0, pp. 19-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lechtman, H. (1993). Technologies of power: The Andean case. In Henderson, J., and Netherly, p. (eds.), Configurations of Power: Holistic Anthropology in Theory and Practice, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NC0, pp. 244-280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemonnier, P. (1992). Elements for an Anthropology of Technology, Anthropological Papers, No. 88 Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J. (1999). Metals, symbols, and society in Bronze Age Denmark. In Robb, J. (ed.), Material Symbols: Culture and Economy in Prehistory, Occasional Papers No. 26, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 205-223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillios, K. (1999). Symbolic artifacts and spheres of meaning: Groundstone tools from Copper Age Portugal. In Robb, J. (ed.), Material Symbols: Culture and Economy in Prehistory, Occasional Papers No. 26, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 173-187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loney, H. (2000). Society and technological control: A critical review of models of technological change in ceramic studies. American Antiquity 65: 646-668.

    Google Scholar 

  • López Varela, S., McAnany, P., and Berry, K. (2001). Ceramics technology at Late Classic K'axob, Belize. Journal of Field Archaeology 28: 177-191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. (1986). The Source of Social Power: A History of Power from the Beginning Until 1760, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, J., and Flannery, K. (1996). Zapotec Civilization: How Urban Society Evolved in Mexico's Oaxaca Valley, Thames and Hudson, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAnany, P. (1993). The economics of social power and wealth among eighth century Maya households. In Sabloff, J., and Henderson, J. (eds.), Lowland Maya Civilization in the Eighth Century A.D., Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, DC, pp. 65-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, J. (1999). Structure, agency, and the locus of the social: Why poststructural theory is good for archaeology. In Robb, J. (ed.), Material Symbols: Culture and Economy in Prehistory, Occasional Papers No. 26, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 16-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCorriston, J. (1997). The fiber revolution: Textile extensification, alienation, and social stratification in ancient Mesopotamia. Current Anthropology 38: 517-550.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, R. (1983). Breaking down cultural complexity: Inequality and heterogeneity. In Schiffer, M. (ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 6, Academic Press, New York, pp. 91-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meillassoux, C. (1981). Maidens, Meal, and Money, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, W., Feinman, G., and Nicholas, L. (2002). Domestic faunal assemblages from the Classic period valley of Oaxaca, Mexico: A perspective on the subsistence and craft economies. Journal of Archaeological Science 29: 233-249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., Rowlands, M., and Tilley, C. (1989). Introduction. In Miller, D., Rowlands, M., and Tilley, C. (eds.), Domination and Resistance, Unwin Hyman, London, pp. 1-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, B. J. (1995). Gender and the reorganization of Historic Zuni craft production: Implications for archaeological interpretation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 51: 149-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moholy-Nagy, H. (1997). Middens, construction fill, and offerings: Evidence for the organization of Classic Period craft production at Tikal, Guatemala. Journal of Field Archaeology 24: 293-313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. (1996). Architecture and Power in the Ancient Andes: The Archaeology of Public Buildings, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, K. (1994). The intensification of production: Archaeological approaches. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1: 111-159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, K., and Sinopoli, C. (1992). Economic diversity and integration in a Pre-Colonial Indian empire. World Archaeology 23: 335-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, C. (1987). Blades and Cobden Chert: A technological argument for their role as markers of regional identification during the Hopewell period in Illinois. In Johnson, J., and Morrow, C. (eds.), The Organization of Core Technology, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 119-150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nader, L. (1997). Centralizing processes: Tracing the dynamic components of power. Current Anthropology 38: 711-737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, B. (1995). Complexity, hierarchy, and scale: A controlled comparison between Chaco Canyon, New Mexico, and La Quemada, Zacatecas. American Antiquity 60: 597-618.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brian, R. (1999). Who weaves and why? Weaving, loom complexity, and trade. Cross-Cultural Research 33: 30-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauketat, T. R. (1997). Cahokian political economy. In Pauketat, T. R., and Emerson, T. (eds.), Cahokia: Domination and Ideology in the Mississippian World, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp. 30-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauketat, T., and Emerson, T. (1999). Representations of hegemony as community at Cahokia. In Robb, J. (ed.), Material Symbols: Culture and Economy in Prehistory, Occasional Papers No. 26, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 302-317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paynter, R. (1989). The archaeology of equality and inequality. Annual Review of Anthropology 18: 369-399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paynter, R., and McGuire, R. (1991). The archaeology of inequality: Culture, domination, and resistance. In McGuire, R., and Paynter, R. (eds.), The Archaeology of Inequality, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 1-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, D. (1981). Archaeology, ethnology, and ceramic production. In Howard, H., and Morris, E. (eds.), Production and Distribution: A Ceramic Viewpoint, BAR International Series, 120, British Archaeological Reports, Oxford, pp. 187-194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peregrine, P. (1991a). Some political aspects of craft specialization. World Archaeology 23: 1-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peregrine, P. (1991b). Prehistoric chiefdoms on the American midcontinent: A world-system based on prestige goods. In Chase-Dunn, C., and Hall, T. (eds.), Core/Periphery Relations in Precapitalist Worlds, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 193-211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peregrine, P., and Feinman, G. (eds.) (1996). Pre-Columbian World Systems, Prehistory Press, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perles, C. (1992). In search of lithic strategies: A cognitive approach to chipped stone assemblages. In Gardin, J.-C., and Peebles, C. (eds.), Representations in Archaeology, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 223-247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfaffenberger, B. (1988). Fetishised objects and humanised nature: Towards an anthropology of technology. Man 23: 236-252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfaffenberger, B. (1992). Social anthropology of technology. Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 491-516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pool, C. (1992). Integrating ceramic production and distribution. In Bey, G., III, and Pool, C. (eds.), Ceramic Production and Distribution: An Integrated Approach, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 275-313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, P. (1991). Domestic Ceramic Production and Spatial Organization: A Mexican Case Study in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, C. (1986). Varna and the emergence of wealth in prehistoric Europe. In Appadurai, A. (ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0, pp. 141-168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robb, J. (1999). Secret agents: Culture, economy, and social reproduction. In Robb, J. (ed.), Material Symbols: Culture and Economy in Prehistory, Occasional Papers No. 26, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 3-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royce, A. (1982). Ethnic Identities: Strategies of Diversity, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, W. (1982). Origins of states: The case of Archaic Greece. Comparative Studies in Society and History 24: 351-377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabloff, J. (1986). Interaction among Classic Maya polities: A preliminary examination. In Renfrew, C., and Cherry, J. (eds.), Peer Polity Interaction and Socio-Political Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0, pp. 109-116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, J. (1972). Style, function, and artifact variability in Paleolithic assemblages. In Renfrew, C. (ed.), The Explanation of Culture Change, Duckworth, London, pp. 317-328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, J. (1982). Approaches to style in lithic archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1: 59-112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saitta, D. (1994). Agency, class, and archaeological interpretation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 13: 201-227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saitta, D. (1997). Power, labor, and the dynamics of change in Chacoan political economy. American Antiquity 62: 7-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saitta, D. (1999). Prestige, agency, and change in middle-range societies. In Robb, J. (ed.), Material Symbols: Culture and Economy in Prehistory, Occasional Papers No. 26, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 135-149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schele, L., and Miller, M. (1986). The Blood of Kings: Dynasty and Ritual in Maya Art, Kimbell Art Museum, Fort Worth, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schortman, E. (1989). Interregional interaction in prehistory: The need for a new perspective. American Antiquity 54: 52-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schortman, E., Urban, P., and Ausec, M. (2001). Politics with style: Identity formation in Prehispanic southeastern Mesoamerica. American Anthropologist 103: 312-330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (1985). Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinopoli, C. (1988). The organization of craft production at Vijayanagara, South India. American Anthropologist 90: 580-597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinopoli, C. (1994). Political choices and economic strategies in the Vijayanagara empire. In Brumfiel, E. (ed.), The Economic Anthropology of the State, University Press of America, Lanham, MD, pp. 223-242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinopoli, C. (1998). Identity and social interaction among south Indian craft producers of the Vijayanagara Period. In Costin, C., and Wright, R. (eds.) Craft and Social Identity, Archeological Papers No. 8, American Anthropological Association, Washington, DA0, pp. 161-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinopoli, C., and Morrison, K. D. (1995). Dimensions and imperial control: The Vijayanagara capital. American Anthropologist 97: 83-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielmann, K. (1998). Ritual craft specialists in middle range societies. In Costin, C., and Wright, R. (eds.), Craft and Social Identity, Archeological Papers No. 8, American Anthropological Association, Washington, DA0, pp. 153-159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielmann, K. (2002). Feasting, craft specialization, and the ritual mode of production. American Anthropologist 104: 195-207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, M. (1991). Ceramic production and community specialization: A Kalinga ethnoarchaeological study. World Archaeology 23: 64-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, M., and Heidka, J. (1998). Ceramic manufacture, productive specialization, and the Early Classic period in Arizona's Tonto Basin. Journal of Anthropological Research 51: 497-517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, G. (1994). Segmentary states and organizational variation in early complex societies: A rural perspective. In Schwartz, G., and Falconer, S. (eds.), Archaeological Views from the Countryside: Village Communities in Early Complex Societies, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DS0, pp. 10-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, G. (1996). Producers, patrons, and prestige: Craft specialists and emergent elites in Mesopotamia from 5500-3100 BC. In Wailes, B. (ed.), Craft Specialization and Social Evolution: In Memory of V. Gordon Childe, University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, pp. 25-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, G. (1998). Heterogeneity, power, and political economy: Some current research issues in the archaeology of Old World complex societies. Journal of Archaeological Research 6: 1-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, G. (2001). Understanding ancient state societies in the Old World. In Feinman, G., and Price, T. D. (eds.), Archaeology at the Millennium: A Sourcebook Kluwer Academic, New York, pp. 353-379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. (1999). An economy of substances in earlier Neolithic Britain. In Robb, J. (ed.), Material Symbols: Culture and Economy in Prehistory, Occasional Papers No. 26, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 70-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, N. (1992). The cultural dynamics of peripheral exchange. In Humphrey, C., and Hugh-Jones, S. (eds.), Barter, Exchange, and Value: An Anthropological Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0, pp. 21-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosi, M. (1984). The notion of craft specialization and its representation in the archaeological record of early states in the Turanian Basin. In Spriggs, M. (ed.), Marxist Perspectives in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0, pp. 22-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, B. (1980). Gordon Childe: Revolutions in Archaeology, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tringham, R. (1996). But Gordon, where are all the people? Some comments on the topic of craft specialization and social evolution. In Wailes, B. (ed.), Craft Specialization and Social Evolution: In Memory of V. Gordon Childe, University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, pp. 233-239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trubitt, M. (2000). Mound building and prestige goods exchange: Changing strategies in the Cahokian chiefdom. American Antiquity 65: 669-690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, V. (1964). Symbols in Ndembu ritual. In Gluckman, M. (ed.), Closed Systems and Open Minds: The Limits of Naivety in Social Science, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, pp. 20-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Pool, T., and Leonard, R. (2002). Specialized ground stone production in the Casas Grandes region of northern Chihuahua, Mexico. American Antiquity 67: 710-730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wailes, B. (1996). V. Gordon Childe and the relations of production. In Wailes, B. (ed.), Craft Specialization and Social Evolution: In Memory of V. Gordon Childe, University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, pp. 3-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wattenmaker, P. (1994). State formation and the organization of craft production at third millenium BC Kurban Hoyuk, southeast Turkey. In Schwartz, G., and Falconer, S. (eds.), Archaeological Views from the Countryside: Village Communities in Early Complex Societies, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DS0, pp. 109-120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wattenmaker, P. (1998). Household and State in Upper Mesopotamia, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DS0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissner, P. (1983). Style and social interaction in Kalahari San projectile points. American Antiquity 48: 253-276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, P. (1988). Industry and society in late prehistoric Europe. In Gibson, O., and Geselowitz, M. (eds.), Tribe and Polity in Late Prehistoric Europe, Plenum, New York, pp. 207-218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, P. (1996). Location, organization, and specialization of craft production in late prehistoric central Europe. In Wailes, B. (ed.), Craft Specialization and Social Evolution: In Memory of V. Gordon Childe, University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, pp. 85-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J., and Pigott, V. (1996). From community craft to regional specialization: Intensification of copper production in pre-state Thailand. In Wailes, B. (ed.), Craft Specialization and Social Evolution: In Memory of V. Gordon Childe, University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, pp. 151-175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wobst, M. (1977). Stylistic behavior and information exchange. In Cleland, C. (ed.), For the Director: Research Essays in Honor of James B. Griffin, Anthropological Papers No. 61, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, pp. 317-342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. (1993). Technological styles: Transforming a natural material into a cultural object. In Luber, S., and Kingerj, W. (eds.) History from Things: Essays on Material Culture, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DS0, pp. 242-269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. (1996). Contexts of specialization: V. Gordon Childe and social evolution. In Wailes, B. (ed.), Craft Specialization and Social Evolution: In Memory of V. Gordon Childe, University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, pp. 123-132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoffee, N. (1991). Maya elite interaction: Through a glass sideways. In Culbert, T. p. (ed.), Classic Maya Political History: Hieroglyphic and Archaeological Evidence, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UC0, pp. 285-310.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schortman, E.M., Urban, P.A. Modeling the Roles of Craft Production in Ancient Political Economies. Journal of Archaeological Research 12, 185–226 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JARE.0000023712.34302.49

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JARE.0000023712.34302.49

Navigation