Skip to main content
Log in

Do Markets Worsen Economic Inequalities? Kuznets in the Bush

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Integration into a market economy or economic development can erode the quality of life of indigenous people by, for example, increasing income inequalities. The Kuznets hypothesis predicts that the link between income inequality and income (a proxy for economic development) resembles an inverted U. We test the hypothesis using a survey of 511 households from 59 villages of Tsimane' Amerindians, a horticultural-foraging society in the tropical rain forest of Bolivia. We measure village inequalities of three economic outcomes: income, imputed annual value of rice production, and wealth. We used three indices of inequality: the coefficient of variation, the standard deviation of the logarithm, and the Gini coefficient. Explanatory variables include either income and income squared, wealth and wealth squared, or imputed annual rice production and production squared. We used village-to-town distance as a control. We find little evidence that integration to the market increases inequalities of economic outcomes, with two exceptions: Wealth bore the predicted inverted U-shaped relation with wealth inequalities, and imputed rice production bore a U-shaped relation to inequality, but only when (a) using adult equivalents to express household size and (b) the Gini coefficient and the coefficient of variation to measure inequality; in no case were results robust to different econometric specifications. We advance several explanations for why economic development might not accentuate economic inequalities among relatively autarkic rural economies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Barro, R. J. (2000). Inequality and growth in a panel of countries. Journal of Economic Growth5: 5-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliege Bird, R. L., and Bird, D. W. (1997). Delayed reciprocity and tolerated theft. Current Anthropology38: 49-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., and Gintis, H. (1999). Is inequality passé? Homo reciprocans and the future of egalitarian politics. Boston Review23: 23-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, D. (1991). Income inequality and economic development: Geographic divergence. Social Science Quarterly72: 520-536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chicchón, A. (1992). Chimane Resource Use and Market Involvement in the Beni Biosphere Reserve, Bolivia, PhD Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Andrade, R. (2001). The sad story of anthropology 1950-1999. In Cerroni-Long, E. L. (ed.), Anthropological Theory in North America, Berin & Garvey, Westport, Connecticut, pp. 23-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. (1997). The Analysis of Household Surveys: A Microeconometric Approach to Development Policy, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. (2001). Health, Inequality, and economic development. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Deninger, K., and Squire, L. (1998). New ways of looking at old issues: Inequality and growth. Journal of Development Economics57: 259-287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, R. G., and Smith, R. S. (2000). Modern Labor Economics: Theory and Public Policy, Addison-Wesley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (1996). A Taste for Movement: An Exploration of the Social Ethics of the Tsimanes of Lowland Bolivia. PhD Thesis, St. Andrews University, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields, G. (1980). Poverty, Inequality, and Development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

  • Fields, G. (2001). Distribution and Development.A New Look at the Developing World, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization, World Health Organization, and United Nations University (1985). Energy and Protein Requirements, World Health Organization, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Aguilar, J. L. (1999). The autonomy and democracy of indigenous peoples in Canada and Mexico. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences565: 79-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godoy, R. A. (2001). Indians, Markets, and Rain Forests: Theory, Methods, Analysis.Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Bolivia (1995). Censo Indígena del Oriente, Chaco y Amazonía, 1994-1995. Secretaría de Asuntos Etnicos, de Genero y Generacionales, Ministry of Human Development, Government of Bolivia, La Paz, Bolivia

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurven, M. (2002). Does market exposure affect economic behavior? The ultimatum game and public goods game among the Tsimane' of Bolivia. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Gurven, M., Hill, K., and Kaplan, H. (2002). From forest to reservation: Transition in food sharing behavior among the Ache of Paraguay. Journal of Anthropological Research58:45-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., and McElreath, R. (2002). Cooperation, reciprocity, and punishment in fifteen small-scale societies. American Economic Review91(2): 73-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. (ed.) (1972). Reinventing Anthropology, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. P. T., and Schofield, E. C. (1990). HumanEnergy Requirements: A Manual for Planners and Nutritionists, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A. W., and Earle, T. (2000). The Evolution of Human Societies: From Foraging Group to Agrarian State, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P., and Venables, A. J. (1999). Globalization and the inequality of nations. In Armstrong, H., and Taylor, J. (eds.), The Economics of Regional Policy, Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 129-152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review45: 1-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • List, J. A., and Gallet, C. A. (1999). The Kuznets curve: What happens after the inverted U? Review of Development Economics3: 200-206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, C. (1999). Globalization and rising inequality in developed countries. Global Business and Economics Review1: 108-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morduch, J. (1995). Income smoothing and consumption smoothing. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9: 103-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortner, S. (1984). Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History26: 126-166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez, E. (2001). Uso de la ictiofauna entre los Tsimane'.BSc, Universidad Mayor de San Andrés, La Paz, Bolivia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, D. (1998). Development Economics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-García, V. (2001). Indigenous People, Ethnobotanical Knowledge, and Market Economy: A Case Study of the Tsimane' Amerindians in Lowland Bolivia. PhD Thesis University of Florida, Gainesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Garcia, V., Godoy, R. A., Vadez, V., Apaza, L., Byron, E., Huanca, T., Leonard, W., and Perez, E. (2003). Indigenous people share botanical knowledge. Estimates from an Amerindian society in Bolivia. Science299: 1707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (1998). Symposium on globalization in perspective: An introduction. Journal of Economic Perspectives12: 3-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1997). On Economic Inequality, Clarendon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., and Ward, G. K. (2000). Indigenous Cultures in an Interconnected World, University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soros, G. (2002). On Globalization, Public Affairs, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and Its Discontents, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upham, S. (1990). The Evolution of Political Systems: Sociopolitics in Small-Scale Sedentary Societies, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vadez, V., Reyes-Garcia, V., Godoy, R. A., Apaza, L., Byron, E., Huanca, T., Leonard, W. R., Wilkie, D., and Perez, E. (in press). Does integration to the market threaten agricultural diversity? Panel and cross-sectional evidence from a horticultural-foraging society in the Bolivian Amazon. Human Ecology.

  • Wilkinson, R. G. (1996). Unhealthy Societies: The Affliction of Inequality, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. G. (1994). Globalization and inequality: Past and present. World Bank Research Observer12: 117-135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. G. (1998). Growth, distribution, and demography: Some lessons from history. Explorations in Economic History35: 241-271.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2001). World Development Report 2000/2001.Attacking Poverty, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Godoy, R.A., Gurven, M., Byron, E. et al. Do Markets Worsen Economic Inequalities? Kuznets in the Bush. Human Ecology 32, 339–364 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HUEC.0000028085.47707.08

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HUEC.0000028085.47707.08

Navigation