Skip to main content
Log in

Inhibitory Difficulties and Anxiety Sensitivity

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anxiety sensitivity (AS) refers to the tendency to interpret anxiety related physical sensations as dangerous (S. Reiss & R. J. McNally, 1985). We hypothesized that individuals with elevated AS would show a difficulty in inhibiting the threat relevant meaning of homographs (words with two meanings, e.g., faint). To test this hypothesis, we used a modified version of Gernsbacher's inhibition paradigm in which participants were first presented with a sentence (e.g., “The car sounds were faint.”) and then a probe word (e.g., “pass-out”) and were asked whether or not the probe word was related to the meaning of the sentence (M. A. Gernsbacher, K. R. Varner, & M. E. Faust, 1990). One half of the sentences ended in a homograph, and one half ended in a nonhomograph word. Results revealed that individuals with elevated AS showed difficulty in inhibiting the threat-relevant meaning of homographs when the interval between the presentation of the sentence and the probe word was short (i.e., 100 ms), but that low AS participants did not. This difficulty in inhibiting threat relevant meanings may be a vulnerability factor involved in elevated AS, as well as the development of panic disorder.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., rev.).Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amir, N., Coles, M., & Foa, E. B. (2002). Inhibition of threat in posttraumatic stress disorder. Cognitive Research and Therapy, 26, 645–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amir,N., Foa, E. B., & Coles, M. E. (1998). Automatic activation and strategic avoidance of threat-relevant information in social phobia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 285–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amir, N., McNally, R. J., Riemann, B. C., & Clements, C. (1996). Implicit memory bias for threat in panic disorder: Application of the white noise paradigm. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 157–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T.,& Steer, R. A. (1987). Beck Depression Inventory manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, M. E., Balota, D. A., Duchek, J. M., Gernsbacher, M. A., & Smith, S. (1997). Inhibitory control during sentence comprehension in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Brain and Language, 57, 225–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garber, J., & Hollon, S. D. (1991). What can specificity designs say about causality in psychopathology research? Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gernsbacher, M. A., Varner, K. R., & Faust, M. E. (1990). Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 430–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, W., & McNally, R. J. (1987). Effects of anxiety sensitivity on the response to hyperventilation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 96, 330–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, R. E. (1999). Implicit and explicit memory for threat words in high-and low-anxiety-sensitive participants. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 23, 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J. (1999) Anxiety sensitivity and information-processing bias for threat. In S. Taylor (Ed.), Anxiety sensitivity: Theory, research, and treatment of the fear of anxiety (pp. 183–198). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J., Hornig C.D., Hoffman E. C., & Han, E. M. (1999). Anxiety sensitivity and cognitive biases for threat. Behavior Therapy, 30, 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapee, R. M., & Medoro, L. (1994). Fear of physical sensations and trait anxiety as mediators of the response to hyperventilation in nonclinical subjects. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 603–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, S., & McNally, R. J. (1985). Expectancy model of fear. In S. Reiss & R. R. Bootzin (Eds.), Theoretical issues in behavior therapy (pp. 107–121). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, S., Peterson, R. A., Gursky, D. M., & McNally, R. J. (1986). Anxiety sensitivity, anxiety frequency and the prediction of fearfulness. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L. (1992). Understanding implicit memory: A cognitive neuroscience approach. American Journal of Psychology, 4, 559–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, N. B., Lerew, D. R., & Jackson, R. J. (1997). The role of anxiety sensitivity in the pathogenesis of panic: Prospective evaluation of spontaneous panic attacks during acute stress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 355–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 20, 206–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1987). Ambiguous words in context: An event-related potential analysis of the time course of meaning activation. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 188–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwaan, R. A., & Truitt, T. P. (2000). Inhibition of smoking-related information in smokers and nonsmokers. Experimental and Clinical Psychpharmacology, 8, 192–197.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nader Amir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amir, N., Beard, C. Inhibitory Difficulties and Anxiety Sensitivity. Cognitive Therapy and Research 28, 283–292 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COTR.0000031803.85597.aa

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COTR.0000031803.85597.aa

Navigation