Skip to main content
Log in

Hypothesis: the act of taking a Papanicolaou smear reduces the prevalence of human papillomavirus infection: a potential impact on the risk of cervical cancer

  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Based on data collected in a case–control study of hormonal contraceptive use and invasive cervical cancer among South African colored and black women, we have reported a five-fold reduction in incidence among women who in their lifetimes had previously received as few as two Papanicolaou (Pap) smears. Given the conditions prevailing in the community under study, a reduction in risk of this magnitude was surprising. We hypothesized that the act of performing a Pap smear may trigger an immune response to human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and thus reduce the risk of cervical cancer. Methods: Among 1540 control women we compared prevalence rates of infection with specific HPVs known to cause cervical cancer among those who previously received 0, 1, 2 or ≥3 Pap smears in their lifetimes. Findings: Overall, 16% of the controls were HPV-positive. Among women who received 0, 1, 2 and ≥3 Pap smears the HPV positivity rates were 24, 17, 12, and 11%, respectively. Compared with never having received a smear, the confounder-adjusted relative risk estimates for the receipt of 1, 2, and ≥3 smears were 0.7 (95% confidence interval, 0.5–1.0), 0.5 (0.3–0.8), and 0.5 (0.3–0.7), respectively (test for trend among Pap smear recipients: p = 0.04). The data were consistent within strata of age, parity, and race. Interpretation: The data are compatible with the hypothesis that the minor trauma involved in taking a Pap smear may reduce the risk of cervical cancer by triggering an immune response to HPV infection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miller AB ed. (1995) Editorial: Failures of cervical cancer screening. Am J Publ Health 85: 761-763.

    Google Scholar 

  2. IARC Working Group (1986) Summary chapter. In: Hakama N,Miller AB,Day NE, eds. Screening for Cancer of the Uterine Cervix. IARC Scientific Publications no. 76. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, pp. 133-134.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Smith N, Moodley J, Hoffman M. Challenges to cervical screening in the Western Cape Province. S Afr Med J (in press).

  4. Shapiro S, Rosenberg L, Hoffman L, et al. Risk of invasive cancer of the cervix in relation to the use of injectable progestogen contraceptives and combined estrogen/progestogen contraceptives. Cancer Causes Control. (in press).

  5. Hoffman M, Cooper D, Carrara H, et al. Risk of invasive cancer of the cervix in relation to screening with Pap smears in the western Cape, South Africa. Int J Epidemiol. (in press).

  6. Herrero R,Brinton LA,Reeves WC, et al. (1992) Screening for cervical cancer in Latin America: a case-control study. Int J Epidemiol 21: 1050-1056.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chaouki N,Bosch X,Munoz N, et al. (1998) The viral origin of cervical cancer in Rabat, Morocco. Int J Cancer 75: 546-554.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ferenczy A,Franco E (2002) Persistent human papillomavirus infection and cervical neoplasia. Lancet Oncol 3: 11-16.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ostor AG (1993) Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review. Int J Gynecol Pathol 12: 186-192.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stanley MA (2001) Immunobiology of papillomavirus infection. J Reprod Immunol 52: 45-59.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nakagawa M,Stites DP,Farhat S, et al. (1997) Cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses to E6 and E7 proteins of human papillomavirus type 16: relationship to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Infect Dis 175: 927-931.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shah KV,Howley PM (1996) Papillomaviruses. In: Fields BN,Knipe DM,Howley PM, eds. Virology; Vol. 2. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, pp. 2077-2109.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Herrero R,Schiffman M,Hildesheim A,Castle PE,Rodriguez AC,Burk RD [Abstract] (2002) Epidemiology of type-specific HPV infection in Guanacaste. Proceedings of the 20th International Papillomavirus Conference, Paris, Institut Pasteur, October 4-9.

  14. Sankaranarayanan R,Shyamalakumary B,Wesley R,Amma NS,Parkin DM,Nair K (1999) Visual inspection with acetic acid in the early detection of cervical cancer and precursors. Int J Cancer 80: 161-163.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel Shapiro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shapiro, S., Carrara, H., Allan, B.R. et al. Hypothesis: the act of taking a Papanicolaou smear reduces the prevalence of human papillomavirus infection: a potential impact on the risk of cervical cancer. Cancer Causes Control 14, 953–957 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CACO.0000007966.59285.39

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CACO.0000007966.59285.39

Navigation