Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative Study of the Seismic Hazard Assessments in European National Seismic Codes

  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The European Union has been promoting an homogenisation of the design rules for earthquake resistant structures through the Eurocode 8, which will soon become the official standard (CEN, 2003). However, the zonation for the basic earthquake ground motion will remain in the national authorities competence. Hence, it is important to outline differences and similarities in the `official' seismic hazard assessments (SHA) used by national seismic codes to define seismic zones and levels of seismic actions. The different SHA in 16 European countries were analysed taking into account a selection of comparative ingredients: date of the SHA, earthquake scale, definition of seismogenic zones, maximum earthquake estimation, attenuation relation, hazard calculation and hazard descriptor. Most of the official European SHAs were made more than 5 years ago, in terms of macroseismic intensity, taking into account seismogenic zones, estimating maximum earthquakes from historical records, making use of attenuation relationships for macroseismic intensity and assuming that earthquake occurrences follow a Poisson process. Most of the countries (11/16) depict hazard for a ∼475 year return period; seven of them use peak ground acceleration and four MSK intensity. There is also an important fraction relating the hazard to a different return period (3/16) or expressing it in a deterministic way (2/16). A general updating and homogenisation in many of the national SHA is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • pericolosita/index.html}

  • Ambraseys, N.N. (1995) The prediction of earthquake peak ground acceleration in Europe. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 24, 467–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys, N.N., Simpson, K.A., Bommer, J.J. (1996). Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 25, 371–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autran A., Blès, J.L., Combes, Ph., Cushing, M., Dominique, P., Durouchoux, Ch., Mohammadioun, B. and Terrer, M. (Working Group EPAS) (1998) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in France-Part 1: Seismotectonic zonation. ECEE'98, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bay, F., Fäh, D., Malagnini L. and Giardini, D. (2003) Spectral shear-wave ground-motion scaling in Switzerland. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 93 (1), 414–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bender, B. and Perkins, D.M. (1987) SEISRISK III: A Computer Program for Seismic Hazard Estimation. U. S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1772, 48 pp.

  • Bonchev, E., Bune, V.I., Christoskov L. et al. (1982) A method for compilation of seismic zoning prognostic maps for the territory of Bulgaria. Geologica Balcanica 12(2), 3–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEN (Comitè Europèen de Normalisation) (2003) prEN 1998-1-Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Draft No. 6, Doc CEN/TC250/SC8/N335, January 2003, Brussels.

  • Čermák, V. (2001) Czech National Centennial Report. In Lee, W.H.K., Kanamori, H., Jennings, P.C. and Kisslinger, C. (eds), International Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology, IASPEI Committee on Education. http://www.whklee.org

  • Cornell, C.A. (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 58, 1583–1606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Despeyroux, J. and Godefroy, P. (1986) Noveau zonage sismique de la France. La Documentation française, Paris, 147 pp.

  • Dominique, P. and Andre, E. (2000) Probabilistic seismic hazard map of the French national territory. Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, January 30-February 4, CD-ROM paper No. 0632, 8 pp. New Zealand Earthquake Commission.

  • Drimmel, J. (1979) Karte der österreichischen Erdbebenzonen. Appendix to ÖNORM B 4015 Teil 1 (1979). Österr, Normungsinstitut, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drimmel, J. (1993) Seismic Hazard in Austria. In McGuire, R.K. (ed.), The Practice of Earthquake Hazard Assessment, International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior and European Seismological Commission, 284 pp.

  • srch.shtml}

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck, van T. and Stoyanov, T. (1996) Seismotectonics and seismic hazard modelling for southern Bulgaria. Tectonophysics 262, 77–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdik, M., Biro, Y.A., Onur, T., Sesetyan, K. and Birgoren, G. (1999) Assessment of earthquake hazard in Turkey and neighbouring regions. Annali di Geofisica 42(6), 1125–1138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, A. (1995) Mapping Seismic Hazard Map in the Central and Eastern United States. Seismological Research Letters 66(4), 8–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, A., Mueller, C., Barnhard, T., Leyendecker, E., Wesson, R., Harmsen, S., Klein, F., Perkins, D., Dickamn, N., Hanson, S. and Hopper, M. (2000) USGS national seismic hazard maps. Earthquake Spectra, 16, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giardini, D. (1999) The Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program (GSHAP)-1992/1999. Annali di Geofisica 42(6), 957–976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giner, J.J., Molina, S. Delgado, J. and Jáuregui, P. (2002) Mixing methodologies in seismic hazard assessment via a logic tree procedure: an application for eastern Spain. Natural Hazards 25(1), 59–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grünthal, G. and Leydecker, G. (1993) Seismic Hazard in Germany. In McGuire, R.K. (ed.), The Practice of Earthquake Hazard Assessment, International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior and European Seismological Commission, 284 pp.

  • Grünthal, G. and Bosse, C. (1996) Probabilistische Karte der Erdbebengefährdung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland-Erdbebenzonierungskarte für das Nationale Anwendungsdokument zum Eurocode 8. Forschungsbericht, STR 96/10, GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam.

  • Grünthal, G., Mayer-Rosa, D. and Lenhardt, W. A., (1998) Abschätzung der Erdbebengefährdung für die D-A-CH-Staaten-Deutschland, Österreich, Schweiz. Bautechnik 75, 10, 753–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gülkan, P. and Yücemen, M.S. (1993) Seismic Hazard in Turkey. In McGuire, R.K. (ed.), The Practice of Earthquake Hazard Assessment, International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior and European Seismological Commission, 284 pp.

  • Gülkan, P. and Kalkan, E. (2002) Attenuation modeling of recent earthquakes in Turkey. Journal of Seismology 6, 397–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gülkan, P., Koçyigit A., Yücemen, M.S., Doyuran, V. and Basöz, N. (1993). A Seismic Zones Map of Turkey Derived from Recent Data (in Turkish). Middle East Technical University, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Report No:93-01, Ankara.

  • Gumbel, E.J. (1958). Statistics of extremes, first edition. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamburger R.O., Court A.B, Soulages J.R. (1995) Vision 2000: A framework for performance based engineering of buildings. In Proceedings of the 6th Structural Engineers Association of California Annual Convention, Indian Wells, California, 19-21 October, pp. 127–145. Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • IAEE (International Association for Earthquake Engineering) (1992) Earthquake Resistant Regulations: A World List-1992. Association for Science Documents Information, Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • IISEE (International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering) (2003) Information Network on Earthquake Disaster Prevention Technologies. Research Project. http://iisee.kenken.go.jp/net/

  • Joyner, W.B. and Boore, D.M. (1988) Measurement, characterization, and prediction of strong ground motion. Proceedings of Earthquake Engineering & Soil Dynamics II, 43–102. Geotechnical Division, ASCE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnik, V., Radu, C., Polonic, G., Prochazkova, D. (1980) Map of maximum observed intensities in Europe. Proceedings of the 17th Assembly of the European Seismological Commission, Budapest, pp. 105–107, Publishing House of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

  • Karnik, V., Prochazkova, D., Schenk, V., Schenkova, Z. and Brouček, I. (1988). Seismic Zoning Map of Czechoslovakia-Version 1987. Studia geophysicae et geophysica et geodaetica 32, 144–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayabali, K. (2002) Modeling of seismic hazard for Turkey using the recent neotectonic data. Engineering Geology 63, 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayabali, K. and Akin, M. (2003). Seismic hazard map of Turkey using the deterministic approach. Engineering Geology 69, 127–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapajne, J., Šket Motnikar, B. and Zupančič, P (2003) Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment Methodology for Distributed Seismicity. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 93(6), in press.

  • Lenhardt, W.A. (1995) Regional earthquake hazard in Austria. In Duma, G. (ed.), Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vienna, Austria, August 28-September 2, Vol. 1, pp. 63–68. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lungu D., Cornea, T., Craifaleanu, I. and Aldea, A. (1995) Seismic zonation of Romania based on uniform hazard response ordinates. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Seismic Zonation, Nice, France, 17-19 October, Vol. 1, pp. 445–452. Ouest Editions, Nantes, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lungu, D., Aldea, A., Arion, C., Demetriu, S., Cornea, T. (2000) Microzonage sismique de la ville de Bucarest-Roumanie. Cahier Technique de l'Association Française du Génie Parasismique, 20, 31–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lungu, D., Aldea, A., Arion, C., Demetriu, S. (2003) Probabilistic zonation of Vrancea seismic hazard. Eurocode 8 representation of design action. 6eme Colloque National de l'Association Francaise du Genie Parasismique, AFPS, CD-ROM, 8 p.

  • Makropoulos, K.C. (1993) Seismic Hazard in Greece. In McGuire, R.K. (ed.), The Practice of Earthquake Hazard Assessment, International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior and European Seismological Commission, 284 pp.

  • Margaris, B.N., Papazachos, C., Papaioannou, Ch., Theodulidis, N., Kalogeras, I. and Skarlatoudis, A. (2002). Ground motion attenuation relations for shallow earthquakes in Greece. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, UK, September 9-13, CD-ROM, Paper Ref. 385.

  • Markusic S. and Herak, M. (1999) Seismic zoning of Croatia. Natural Hazards 18, 269–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusic, S., Suhadolc, P., Herak, M. and Vaccari, F. (2000) A Contribution to Seismic Hazard Assessment in Croatia from Deterministic Modeling. Pure applied geophysics 157(1-2), 185–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer-Rosa, D. (1993) Seismic Hazard in Switzerland. In McGuire, R.K. (ed.), The Practice of Earthquake Hazard Assessment, International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior and European Seismological Commission, 284 pp.

  • McGuire, R.K. (1974) Seismic structural response risk analysis, incorporating peak response regressions on earthquake magnitude and distance. MIT, Dept. Civil Eng. Research, Report 74-51.

  • McGuire, R.K. (1976) EQRISK, Evaluation of earthquake risk to site. Open File report 7667, USGS, USA, 90 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, R.K. (1993) The Practice of Earthquake Hazard Assessment. International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior and European Seismological Commission, 284 pp.

  • Mézcua, J. and Martín, A.J. (1993). Seismic Hazard in Spain. In McGuire, R.K. (ed.), The Practice of Earthquake Hazard Assessment, International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior and European Seismological Commission, 284 pp.

  • Mihailov, V. (1978) Seismic hazard model of Macedonia. In Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Dubronik, Yugoslavia, Vol. I, paper 1-09, pp. 63–70. Yugoslav Association for Earthquake Engineering, Ljubljana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihailov, V. (1993) Seismic Hazard in Former Yugoslavia. In McGuire, R.K. (ed.), The Practice of Earthquake Hazard Assessment, International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior and European Seismological Commission, 284 pp.

  • Mouroux, P., Godefroy, P. and Ferrieux, H. (1993) Seismic Hazard in France. In McGuire, R.K. (ed.), The Practice of Earthquake Hazard Assessment, International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior and European Seismological Commission, 284 pp.

  • Musson, R.M.V. (1999) Probabilistic seismic hazard maps for the North Balkan region. Annali di Geofisica, 42(6), 1109–1124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muço, B., Vaccari, F., Panza, G. and Kuka, N. (2002) Seismic zonation in Albania using a deterministic approach. Tectonophysics 344 (3-4), 277–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, C.S. (1980) Seismic hazard analysis for zones of intermediate seismicity. In Proceedings of the 7th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey, 8-13 September, Vol. 1, pp. 269–276. Turkish National Committee on Earthquake Engineering, Ankara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, C. S., Sousa, M. L. and Martins, A. (1995) The importance of attenuation laws on hazard evaluation in Portugal. In Duma, G. (ed.), Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vienna, Austria, August 28-September 2, Vol. 1, pp. 75–87. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, C.S., Campos-Costa, A. and Sousa, M.L. (2000) Definition of seismic action in the context of EC-8: topics for discussion. Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, January 30-February 4, CD-ROM paper No. 2552, 9 pp. New Zealand Earthquake Commission.

  • Orozova-Stanishkova, L. and Slejko, D. (1994) Seismic Hazard of Bulgaria. Natural Hazards 9, 247–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orozova-Stanishkova, J.M., Costa, G., Vaccari, F. and Suhadolc, P. (1995) Estimates of 1 Hz maximum acceleration in Bulgaria for seismic risk reduction purposes. Tectonophysics 258, 263–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papaioannou, Ch.A. and Papazachos, B.C. (2000). Time-independent and time-dependent seismic hazard in Greece based on seismogenic sources. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 90(1), 22–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papazachos, B.C. (1990). Seismicity of the Aegean and surrounding area. Tectonophysics, 178, 287–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peláez-Montilla, J.A., López-Casado, C. and Henares Romero, J. (2002) Deaggregation in magnitude, distance, and azimuth in the south and west of the Iberian Peninsula. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 92(6), 2177–2185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrescu, G. and Radu, C. (1963) Seismicity of Romania. Annals of Bucharest University, Natural Sciences Series, Mathematics-Physics, 40(XII), 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrini, V., Bosi, C., Bigi, G., Eva, C., Grandori, G., Iaccarino, E., Luongo, G., Postpischl, D., Praturlon, A., Riuscetti, M., Scandone, P., Scarpa, R., Stucchi, M. and Vezzani, L. (1981) Carta della pericolosità sismica d'Italia. Pubbl.: 442, Progetto Finalizzato Geodinamica, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche.

  • Poljak, M., Zupančič, P., Lapajne, J.K., and Šket Motnikar, B. (2000) Seismotectonic input for spatially smoothed seismicity approach. Proceedings of the Workshop Seismicity modeling in seismic hazard mapping, Poljče, Slovenia, May 22-24, 117–124.

  • Radulian, M., Vaccari, F., Mândrescu, N., Panza, G F. and Moldoveanu, C.L. (2000) Seismic Hazard of Romania: Deterministic Approach. Pure and applied geophysics 157, 221–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romeo, R. and Pugliese, A. (1997) La pericolosità sismica in Italia. Parte 1: analisi della scuotibilità. Rapporto tecnico SSN/RT/97/1, Servizio Sismico Nazionale, Roma. http://www.serviziosismico.it/RT/rt9701/frameset.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabetta, F. and Pugliese, A. (1987) Attenuation of peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from Italian strong-motion records. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 77(5), 1491–1511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabetta F. and Pugliese, A. (1996) Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motion, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 86, 337–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saegesser, R. and Mayer-Rosa, D. (1978) Erdbebengefährdung in der Schweiz. Schweizerische Bauzeitung SIA, 3–18.

  • Schenk, V. (1993) Seismic Hazard in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. In McGuire, R.K. (ed.), The Practice of Earthquake Hazard Assessment, International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior and European Seismological Commission, 284 pp.

  • Schenk, V. and Mantlík, F. (1985) Map of Maximum Expected Macroseismic Intensity in Czechoslvakia. In Schenk, V. and Schenkova, Z. (eds), Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on the Analysis of Seismicity and on Seismic Risk. Liblice Castle, Czechoslovakia, June 17-22, pp. 440–445. Geophysical Institute, Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Prague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenk, V. and Schenková, Z. (1998) CSN 73 0036, Amendment 2 "seismic Loads of Buildings’. Czech technical code, ICS 91.080.00, 91.040.00. May 1998 Czech Normalisation Institute, Prague, 5 pp and 1 map.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenk, V., Schenková, Z. and Kottnauer, P. (1996) Earthquake Hazard Assessment for the Czech Republic and Adjacent Area. In Schenk, V. (ed.), Earthquake Hazard and Risk, 'Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research' No. 6, pp. 125–140. Kluwer Bookseries, Dordrecht-Boston-London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenk, V., Schenková, Z., Kottnauer, P., Guterch, B. and Labák, P. (2000) Earthquake hazard for the Czech Republic, Poland and Slovakia: contribution to the ILC/IASPEI Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program. Natural Hazards 21(2-3), 329–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, J. and Grünthal, G. (1998) Zukunftsorientierte Konzepte zur Beschreibung seismischer Einwirkungen für das Erdbebeningenieurwesen. Bautechnik 75, 737–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shebalin, N. (1958). Correlation between earthquake magnitude and intensity. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 2, 86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slejko, D., Peruzza, L. and Rebez, A. (1998). Seismic Hazard maps of Italy. Annali di Geofisica 41(2), 183–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, M.L. and Oliveira, C.S. (1996) Hazard mapping based on macroseismic data considering the influence of geological conditions. Natural Hazards 14(2-3), 207–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoyanov, T. (1993) Seismic Hazard in Bulgaria. In McGuire, R.K. (ed.), The Practice of Earthquake Hazard Assessment, International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior and European Seismological Commission, 284 pp.

  • Sulstarova, E., Koçiaj, S. and Aliaj, A. (1980) Seismic Regionalization of the PSR of Albania. '8 Nentori' Publishing House, Tirana, 297 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulstarova, E. (1993) Seismic Hazard in Albania. In McGuire, R.K. (ed.), The Practice of Earthquake Hazard Assessment, International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior and European Seismological Commission, 284 pp.

  • Sulstarova, E. (1997) Seismic hazard assessment in Albania at national level. In Vogel, A. and Brandes, K. (eds), Mitigating the Impact of Impending Earthquakes: Earthquake Prognostics Strategy Transferred into Practice, pp. 175–182. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunaric, D., Nedeljkovic, S. and Lojpur, M. (1992) Seismic risk in town and planning seismic codes in Yugoslavia. In Proceedings of the 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Madrid, Spain, July 19-24, Vol. 10, pp. 6193–6194. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swiss Seismological Survey (2003). Hazard maps for Switzerland. http://histserver.ethz.ch/hazard/

  • Theodulidis, N. and Papazachos, B. (1992). Dependence of strong ground motion on magnitudedistance, site geology and macroseismic intensity for shallow earthquakes in Greece: I, Peak horizontal acceleration, velocity and displacement. Soil Dynamics & Earthquake Engineering, 11, 387–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dpto. de Geodinámica, Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Ciudad Universitaria s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain

    Julián García-Mayordomo

  2. Dpto. di Ingegneria Strutturale, Politecnico di Milano. Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133, Milan, Italy

    Ezio Faccioli & Roberto Paolucci

Authors
  1. Julián García-Mayordomo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ezio Faccioli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Roberto Paolucci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

García-Mayordomo, J., Faccioli, E. & Paolucci, R. Comparative Study of the Seismic Hazard Assessments in European National Seismic Codes. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2, 51–73 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BEEE.0000039046.42398.9d

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BEEE.0000039046.42398.9d

Search

Navigation