Skip to main content
Log in

Species composition and structure of regenerated and remnant forest patches within an urban landscape

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Regenerated and remnant forest patches were inventoried in Syracuse, New York, USA to determine differences in structure, species composition, human disturbances, and landscape context. Patches had similar mean stem diameter, total stem density, and total basal areas, but differed with respect to diameter distribution, disturbance regime, landscape context, and occurrence of introduced species. In regenerated patches, 23 introduced species were inventoried and they accounted for 48% of relative density. In remnant patches, only seven introduced species were inventoried and they accounted for 17% of the relative density. Cluster analyses identified two community types for remnant patches—sugar maple and black oak—and three for regenerated patches—sugar maple, Norway maple, and boxelder. For remnant patches, Rhamnus cathartica dominated the small diameter class in the black oak cluster, and Acer saccharum dominated the small diameter class in the sugar maple cluster. For regenerated patches, introduced species—A. platanoides and R. cathartica—dominated the small diameter class in the Norway cluster, and a mixture of native and introduced species—A. negundo, R. cathartica, A. saccharum, and Rhus typhina—dominated the small diameter classes in the sugar maple and boxelder clusters. Functionally, land covers containing remnant and regenerated patches, such as vacant lots and greenspaces, had the highest net rate of carbon sequestration (848.7 mt/ha/yr).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Airola, T.M. and Buchholz, K. (1984) Species structure and soil characteristics of five urban sites along the New Jersey Palisades. Urb. Ecol. 8, 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.R., Hardy, E.E., Roach, J.T. and Witmer, R.E. (1976) Land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensing data, Professional Paper 964. US Geological Survey, Washington, D. C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, J.T. and McIntosh, R.P. (1951) An upland forest continuum in the prairie-forest border region of Wisconsin. Ecology 72, 476–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detwyler, T.R. (1972) Vegetation of the city. In Urbanization and Environment (T.R. Detwyler and M.G. Marcus, eds.), pp. 229–258. Duxbury Press, Belmont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, M.E. (1961) Checklist of Vascular Plants in Onondaga County, New York. Syracuse University Department of Bacteriology and Botany, Syracuse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R.T.T. (1995) Land Mosaics. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R.T.T. and Godron, M. (1981) Patches and structural components for a landscape ecology. BioScience 31, 733–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, H.A. and Cronquist, A. (1991) Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. The New York Botanical Garden, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greller, A.M. (1975) Persisting natural vegetation in northern Queens County, New York. Environ. Conserv. 2, 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove, J.M. and Burch, W.R. (1997) Asocial ecology approach and applications of urban ecosystem and landscape analyses: A case study of Baltimore, Maryland. Urb. Ecosyst. 1, 259–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guldin, J., Smith, J.R. and Thompson, L. (1990) Stand structure of an old-growth upland hardwood forest in Overton Park, Memphis, Tennessee. In Ecosystem management: Rare species and significant habitat. N. Y. S. Museum Bull. 471, 61–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guntenspergen, G.R. and Levenson, J.B. (1997) Understory plant species composition in remnant stands along an urban-to-rural land use gradient. Urb. Ecosyst. 1, 155–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, E.R. (1988a) Species richness of urban forest patches and implications for urban landscape diversity. Land. Ecol. 1, 141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, E.R. (1988b) Using ordination to analyze the composition and structure of urban forest islands. For. Ecol. Manage. 23, 139–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, F.Z. and Rice, C.E. (1977) Soil Survey of Onondaga County, NY. USDA Soil Conservation Service in Cooperation with Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, J.B. (1981) Woodlots as biogeographic islands in Southeastern Wisconsin. In Forest Island Dynamics in Man-Dominated Landscapes (R. L. Burgess and D. M. Sharpe, eds.), pp. 13–40. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorimer, C.G. (1993) Causes of the oak regeneration problem. In Oak Regeneration: Serious Problems, Practical Recommendations, Symposium Proceedings Held in Knoxville, Tennessee 8–10 Sept. 1992 (D. Loftis and C. E. McGee, eds.), pp. 14–39. USDA Forest Service Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asheville, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, G.M., Traynor, M.M., Pouyat, R.V., Zhu, W. and Baxter, J.W. (2000) Atmospheric deposition to oak forests along an urban-rural gradient. Environ. Sci. Tech. 34, 4294–4300.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride, J.R. and Jacobs, D.F. (1976) Urban forest development: A case study, Menlo Park, California. Urb. Ecol. 2, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune, B. and Mefford, M.J. (1999) Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data, Version 4. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, M.J., Pickett, S.T.A., Groffman, P., Bohlen, P., Pouyat, R.V., Zipperer, W.C., Parmelee, R.W. and Medley, K. (1997) Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient. Urb. Ecosyst. 1, 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, M. (1984) Influence of adjacent land use on understory vegetation of New York forests. Urb. Ecol. 8, 329–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, D.J. and Crane, D.E. (2000) The urban forest effect (UFORE) model: Quantifying urban forest structure and functions. In Integrated Tools for Natural Resources Inventories in the 21st Century, Proceedings of the IUFRO Conference Held in Boise, Idaho 16–20 August 1998 (M. Hansen and T. Burk, eds.), pp. 714–720. USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station, St. Paul, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, D.J., Crane, D.E. and Stevens, J.C. (2001) Syracuse's urban forestry resource, NE-287. USDA Forest Service, Newtown Square.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, D.J. and Dwyer, J.F. (2000) Understanding the benefits and costs of urban forest ecosystems. In Handbook of Urban and Community Forestry in the Northeast (J. E. Kuser, ed.), pp. 11–25. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, D.J. and Rowntree, R.A. (1990) History and range of Norway maple. J. Arboricul. 16, 291–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouyat, R.V. and McDonnell, M.J. (1991) Heavy metal accumulation in forest soils along an urban-rural gradient in southern New York, USA. Water Air Soil Pol. 57/58, 797–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Profous, G.V. and Loeb, R.E. (1984) Vegetation and plant communities of Van Cortlandt Park, Bronx, N.Y. Bull. Tor. Bot. Club 11, 80–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, N.A. and Stevens, J.C. (1979) Streetside space and street trees in Syracuse-1978, State University of New York Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudnicky, J.L. and McDonnell, M.J. (1989) Forty-eight years of canopy change in a hardwood-hemlock forest in New York City. Bull. Tor. Bot. Club 116, 52–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, D.M., Stearns, F., Leitner, L.A. and Dorney, J.R. (1986) Fate of natural vegetation during urban development of rural landscapes in southeastern Wisconsin. Urb. Ecol. 9, 267–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J. (1969) Biometery. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lear, D.H. and Watt, J.M. (1993) The role of fire in oak regeneration. In Oak Regeneration: Serious Problems, Practical Recommendations, Symposium Proceedings Held in Knoxville, Tennessee 8–10 Sept. 1992 (D. Loftis and C. E. McGee, eds.), pp. 66–78. USDA Forest Service Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asheville, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, C.S. and McDonnell, M.J. (1988) Nitrogen cycling processes and soil characteristics in an urban versus rural forest. Biogeochemistry 5, 243–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, G.G. and Adams, S.D. (1980) Man as a maker of new plant communities. J. Appl. Ecol. 17, 431–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipperer, W.C., Foresman, T.W., Sisinni, S.M. and Pouyat, R.V. (1997) Urban tree cover: An ecological perspective. Urb. Ecosyst. 1, 229–246.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zipperer, W.C. Species composition and structure of regenerated and remnant forest patches within an urban landscape. Urban Ecosystems 6, 271–290 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:UECO.0000004827.12561.d4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:UECO.0000004827.12561.d4

Navigation