Abstract
Nucellar explants from the immature fruit of ‘Ataulfo’ mango, 3–4 cm long, were used. The process had a very low efficiency (<10%); however, ‘Ataulfo’ was more embryogenic than other cultivars such as ‘Tommy Atkins’ or ‘Haden’ in our hands. Overall, the process from nucellus to plantlet stage took 5 months. Twelve regenerated plants were obtained and are currently growing in the greenhouse. They appear to be normal and free of abnormalities. Some biochemical and molecular tests are currently being carried out.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ara H, Jaiswal U & Jaiswal VS (1999) Germination and plantlet regeneration from encapsulated somatic embryos of mango (Mangifera indica L.). Plant Cell Rep. 19: 166–170
DeWald SG, Litz RE & Moore GA (1989a) Optimizing somatic embryos production in mango. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 114: 712–716
DeWald SG, Litz RE & Moore GA (1989b) Maturation and germination of mango somatic embryos. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 114: 837–841
FAOSTAT Database Results (2004) http://apps1.fao.org
Litz RE (1984) In vitro somatic embryogenesis from nucellar callus of monoembryonic mango. HortScience 19: 715–717
Litz RE, Knight RJ & Gazit S (1982) Somatic embryos from ovule cultures of Mangifera indica L. Plant Cell Rep. 1: 264–266
Litz RE, Hendrix RC, Moon PA & Chavez VM (1998) Induction of embryogenic cultures as affected by genotype explanting, 2,4-D and embryogenic nurse culture. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 53: 13–18
Mukherjee SK (1998) Introduction: botany and importance. In: Litz RE (ed) The Mango: Botany, Production and Uses (pp. 1–19). CABI, Wallingford Oxon
Murashige T & Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–479
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rivera-Domínguez, M., Manzanilla-Ramírez, M.A., Robles-González, M. et al. Induction of Somatic Embryogenesis and Plant Regeneration of ‘Ataulfo’ Mango (Mangifera indica). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 79, 101–104 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TICU.0000049442.54898.6f
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TICU.0000049442.54898.6f