Skip to main content
Log in

Optical Virtual Private Networks: Applications, Functionality and Implementation

  • Published:
Photonic Network Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Today's economic environment presents special challenges for telecommunication carriers—finding new ways to drive down network costs i, without limiting future growth opportunities. Minimizing operating expenses and capital expenditures is not sufficient to ensure future prosperity. New, value-added services can help carriers increase their revenues and profits—today. Virtual private networks (VPNs), both data (IP & MPLS) and optical, fit the description of value-added services. VPN services have received ample attention over the last few years as they are viewed by carriers as an attractive value added service and by customers as a cost effective replacement of leased private lines. VPNs can also help carriers reduce their costs—both capital and operational—by supporting multiple customers, each allowed with varying levels of network control and management over the same (shared) infrastructure. Optical virtual private networks (O-VPNs) represent the next step in the evolution of VPNs and provide similar underlying benefits as other VPN technologies to carriers. Although both carriers and vendors have been talking about O-VPNs for years, the first commercially viable solutions started becoming available in early 2002 [1]. O-VPNs provide carriers with new revenue opportunities as well as the potential to reduce their operating and capital costs. Additionally, O-VPNs offer carrier-customers several benefits, including lower networking costs, increased network flexibility and control, and improved network operational efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tellium press release, Tellium Launches Industry's First Commercially Available Optical Virtual Private Networking Product (May 28, 2002), http://www.tellium.com/press/

  2. Frame Relay Forum, A Detailed Analysis of FR-VPNs vs. IP-VPNs.

  3. VPN Consortium, VPN technologies: Definitions and requirements, White Paper (June 2002), available at http://www.vpnc.org/vpn-technologies.pdf

  4. M. Carugi, D. McDysan, eds, Service requirements for layer 3 provider provisioned virtual private networks, Internet Draft, Work in Progress, draft-left-ppvpn-requirements-05.txt. (October 2002).

  5. Cisco System (whitepaper), A comparison between IPsec and multiprotocol label switching virtual private networks (2000).

  6. IDC Whitepaper (Commissioned by BTwholesale), The virtual telecoms business: A CAPEX lite business model that works, (July 2002), Lars M. Vestergaard (Analyst).

  7. Webtorials.com (Editor/Publisher), VPNs: Reality Behind the Hype, Distributed Networking Associates, Steven Taylor (President), (Fall/Winter 2000).

  8. Yankee Group, VPNs in the SMB Market, small and medium business communications, vol. 5, no. 4, (April 2001), J. P. Gownder.

  9. Yankee Group, IP VPN market renaissance is just around the corner, Security Solutions & Services, vol. 1, no. 5, (February 2001), Eric Hindin.

  10. Pioneer Consulting, Wavelength services and the business cycle: An assessment of standards development, opportunities and global demand (Fall 2002).

  11. TeleChoice (whitepaper), Expanding the IP VPN value proposition: An introduction and analysis of network-based service delivery (March 2002).

  12. W. Townsley et al., Layer Two Tunneling Protocol (L2TP), RFC2661 (August 1999).

  13. P. Srisuresh, Secure Remote Access with L2TP, RFC2888 (August 2000).

  14. K. Hamzeh et al., Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol (PPTP), RFC2637 (July 1999).

  15. Business Communications Review (BCR), “MPLS's Newest Application: Layer 2 VPNs”, Mary Petrosky (February 2002).

  16. Meriton Networks Whitepaper, The Business Case for Wavelength Services (2002).

  17. RHK market research, Larry Goldman (2001).

  18. AT&T, “The Network Evolution: Journey to a Multi-Service Edge, Self-Operating Network” presentation, Hossein Eslambolchi, RHK STARTRAX 2002 conference (December 2002).

  19. Hamid Ould-Brahim et al., “Service Requirements for Optical Virtual Private Networks”, Internet Draft, Work in Progress, draft-ouldbrahim-ppvpn-O-VPN-requirements-00.txt, (June 2002).

  20. IP Security Document Roadmap, RFC 2411 (November 1998).

  21. K. Muthukrishnan, A. Malis, A Core MPLS IP VPN Architecture, RFC 2917 (September 2000).

  22. Osama Aboul-Magd, “UNI 2.0 Signaling Extensions for the Support of OVPN Services”, OIF contribution oif2002.188, (April 2002).

  23. Raouf Boutaba, Walfrey Ng, and Alberto Leon-Garcia, “Web-Based Customer Management of VPNs”, available online from the Canarie library at: http://www.canarie.ca/canet4/library/customer/vpn.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

French, S., Pendarakis, D. Optical Virtual Private Networks: Applications, Functionality and Implementation. Photonic Network Communications 7, 227–238 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PNET.0000026888.29319.b1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PNET.0000026888.29319.b1

Navigation