Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interpatch movements in spatially structured populations: a literature review

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We used published data of individuals moving among habitat patches to answer questions pertaining to frequency of interpatch movements and subsequent effects on population dynamics. A review of 415 published articles produced data for 89 species-system combinations where movements were recorded in sufficient detail to include in our analysis. The percentage of individuals in a population that moved among habitat patches ranged from 0.00 to 93.00%, with a mean of 16.84%. Scaling this statistic by generation time yielded a mean movement rate of 15.45 ± 3.27% per generation. The relatively low movement rates suggest that subpopulations, except those of invertebrates, should not be highly integrated. Less than half of the empirical studies reported on the population effects of interpatch movement. Of these, thirty-three studies yielded population effects on 34 individual species in 45 species-systems. They reported movement having a positive effect 28 times, a negative effect twice and a neutral effect 14 times. Despite its importance, relatively few studies document rates of interpatch movement and far fewer determine population level consequences of these movements. This deficiency limits our ability to understand the dynamics of spatially structured populations and apply that knowledge to conservation efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aars J. and Ims R.A. 1999. The effect of habitat corridors on rates of transfer and interbreeding between vole demes. Ecology 80: 1648–1655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreassen H.P. and Ims R.A. 1998. The effects of experimental habitat destruction and patch isolation on space use and fitness parameters in female root vole Microtus oeconomus. Journal of Animal Ecology 67: 941–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreassen H.P., Hertzberg K. and Ims R.A. 1998. Space-use responses to habitat fragmentation and connectivity in the root vole Microtus oeconomus. Ecology 79:1223–1235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Addicott J.F., Aho J.M., Antolin M.F., Padilla D.K., Richardson J.S. and Soluk D.A. 1987. Ecological neighborhoods: scaling environmental patterns. Oikos 49: 340–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beacham T.D. 1980. Dispersal during population flucuations of the vole, Microtus townsendii. Journal of Animal Ecology 49: 867–877.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett A.F. 1990. Habitat corridors and the conservation of small mammals in a fragmented forest environment. Landscape Ecology 4: 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berven K.A. and Grudzen T.A. 1990. Dispersal in the wood frog (Rana sylvatica): implications for genetic population structure. Evolution 44: 2047–2056.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjoernstad O.N. and Bolker B. 2000. Canonical functions for dispersal-induced synchrony. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 267: 1787–1794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers M.A. and Dooley Jr. J.L. 1991. Role of habitat mosaics on the outcome of two-species competition. Oikos 60: 180–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers M.A. and Dooley Jr. J.L. 1993. Predation hazard and seed removal by small mammals: microhabitat versus patch scale effects. Oecologia 94: 247–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers M.A., Gregario K., Brame C.J., Matter S.F. and Dooley Jr. J.L. 1996a. Use of space and habitats by meadow voles at the home range, patch and landscape scales. Oecologia 105: 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers M.A., Matter S.F., Dooley Jr. J.L., Dauten J.L. and Simkins J.A. 1996b. Controlled experiments of habitat fragmentation: a simple computer simulation and a test using small mammals. Oecologia 108: 182–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers M.A. and Matter S.F. 1997. Landscape ecology of mammals: relationships between density and patch size. Journal of Mammalogy 78: 999–1013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breden F. 1987. The effect of post-metamorphic dispersal on the population genetic structure of Fowler’s Toad, Bufo woodhousei fowleri. Copeia 1987: 386–395.

  • Brown J.H. and Kodric-Brown A. 1977. Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology 58: 445–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownie C., Hines J.E., Nichols J.D., Pollock K.H. and Hestbeck J.B. 1993. Capture-recapture studies for multiple strata including non-Markovian transition probabilities. Biometrics 49: 1173–1187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole F.R. 1978. A movement barrier useful in population studies of small mammals. American Midland Naturalist 100: 480–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster J.P., Atkinson D.A. and French M.C. 1995. The spatial population dynamics of insects exploiting a patchy food resource. Oecologia 104: 354–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickman B.C. and Doncaster C.P. 1989. The ecology of small mammals in urban habitats. II. Demography and dispersal. Journal of Animal Ecology 58: 119–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diffendorfer J.E., Gaines M.S. and Holt R.D. 1995. Habitat fragmentation and movements of three small mammals (Sigmodon, Microtus and Peromyscus). Ecology 76: 827–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooley Jr. J.L. and Bowers M.A. 1996. Influences of patch size and microhabitat on the demography of two old-field rodents. Oikos 75: 543–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elphick C., Dunning J.B. and Sibley D.A. 2001. Sibley Guide to Bird Life: Behavior. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans F.C. and Holdenried R. 1943. A population study of the Beechey ground squirrel in central California. Journal of Mammalogy 24: 231–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L. and Merriam G. 1985. Habitat patchy connectivity and population survival. Ecology 66: 1762–1768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett M.G. and Franklin W.L. 1988. Behavioral ecology of dispersal in the black-tailed prairie dog. Journal of Mammalogy 69: 236–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons J.W., Greene J.L. and Congdon J.D. 1990. Temporal and spatial movement patterns of sliders and other turtles. In: Gibbons J.W. (ed.), Life History and Ecology of the Slider Turtle, pp. 210–215. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill D.E. 1978. Effective population size and interdemic migration rates in a metapopulation of the red-spotted newt, Notophthalmus viridescens. Evolution 32: 839–849.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosholz E.D. 1993. The influence of habitat heterogeneity on host-pathogen population dynamics. Oecologia 96: 347–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas C.A. 1995. Dispersal and use of corridors by birds in wooded patches on an agricultural landscape. Conservation Biology 9: 845–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad N.M. 1999. Corridor and distance effects on interpatch movements: a landscape experiment with butterflies. Ecological Applications 9: 612–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddad N.M., Bowne D.R., Cunningham A., Danielson B., Levey D., Sargent S. and Spira T. 2003. Corridor use by diverse taxa. Ecology. 84: 609–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I., Alho J. and Moilanen A. 2000. Estimating the parameters of survival and migration of individuals in metapopulations. Ecology 81: 239–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I. and Gilpin M. 1991. Metapopulation dynamics: brief history and conceptual domain. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42: 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I. and Gilpin M. 1997. Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I., Kuussaari M. and Nieminen M. 1994. Metapopulation structure and migration in the butterfly Melitaea cinxia. Ecology 75: 747–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I., Pakkala T., Kuussaari M. and Lei G. 1995. Metapopulation persistence of an endangered butterfly in a fragmented landscape. Oikos 72: 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison S. 1991. Local extinction in a metapopulation context: an empirical evaluation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42: 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison S. 1995. Metapopulations and conservation. In: Edwards P.J., May R.M. and Webb N.R. (eds), Large-scale Ecology and Conservation Biology, pp. 111–128. Edited by Blackwell, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

  • Harrison S., Murphy D.D. and Ehrlich P.R. 1988. Distribution of the bay checkerspot butterfly, Euphydryas editha bayensis: evidence for a metapopulation model. American Naturalist 132: 360–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison S. and Taylor A.D. 1997. Empirical evidence for metapopulation dynamics. In: Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution, pp. 27–42. Edited by Hanski I.A. and Gilpin M.E. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings A. 1993. Complex interactions between dispersal and dynamics: lessons from coupled logistic equations. Ecology 72: 896–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson M.T., Merriam G. and Wegner J. 1985. Patchy environments and species survival: chipmunks in an agricultural mosaic. Biological Conservation 31: 95–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill J.K., Thomas C. and Lewis O.T. 1996. Effects of habitat patch size and isolation on dispersal by Hesperia comma butterflies: implications for metapopulation structure. Journal of Animal Ecology 65:725–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ims R.A. and Yoccoz N.G. 1997. Studying transfer processes in metapopulations: emigration, migration and colonization. In: Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution, pp. 247–265. Edited by Hanski I.A. and Gilpin M.E. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joule J. and Cameron G.N. 1975. Species removal studies. I. Dispersal strategies of sympatric Sigmodon hispidus and Reithrodontomys fulvescens populations. Journal of Mammalogy. 56: 378–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva P. and Wennergren U. 1995. Connecting landscape patterns to ecosystem and population processes. Nature 373: 299–320.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kindvall O. and Ahlen I. 1992. Geometrical factors and metapopulation dynamics of the bush cricket, Metrioptera bicolor Philippi (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Conservation Biology 6: 520–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotliar N.B. and Wiens J.A. 1990. Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity. Oikos 59: 253–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozakiewicz M., Kozakiewicz A., Lukowski A. and Gortat T. 1993. Use of space by bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) in a polish farm landscape. Landscape Ecology 8: 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozel R.M. and Fleharty E.D. 1979. Movements of rodents across roads. Southwestern Naturalist 24: 239–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krohne D.T., Dubbs B.A. and Baccus R. 1984. An analysis of dispersal in an unmanipulated population of Peromyscus leucopus. American Midland Naturalist 112: 146–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin S.A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73: 1943–1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins R. 1970. Extinction. In Some Mathematical Problems in Biology, pp. 77–107. Edited by Gerstenhaber M. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidicker Jr. W.Z. 1995. Landscape Approaches in Mammalian Ecology and Conservation. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg M.S., Sedinger J.S., Derksen D.V. and Rockwell R.F. 1998. Natal and breeding philopatry in a black brant, Branta bernicla nigricans, metapopulation. Ecology 79: 1893–1904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loison A., Jullien J. and Menaut P. 1999. Subpopulation structure and dispersal in two populations of chamois. Journal of Mammalogy 80: 620–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz G.C. and Barrett G.W. 1990. Influence of simulated landscape corridors on house mouse (Mus musculus) dispersal. American Midland Naturalist 123: 348–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mader H.J. 1984. Animal habitat isolation by roads and agricultural fields. Biological Conservation 29: 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh D.M., Fegraus E.H. and Harrison S. 1999. Effects of breeding pond isolation on the spatial and temporal dynamics of pond use by the tungara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus. Journal of Animal Ecology 68:804–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matter S.F. 1996. Interpatch movement of the red milkweed beetle, Tetropes tetraophthalmus: individual responses to patch size and isolation. Oecologia 105: 447–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCauley D.E., Ott J.O., Stine A. and McGrath S. 1981. Limited dispersal and its effects on population structure in the milkweed beetle, Tetraopes tetraophthalmus. Oecologia 51: 145–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell J.C. 1994. Reptiles of Virginia. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morreale S.J., Gibbons J.W. and Congdon J.D. 1984. Significance of activity and movement in the yellow-bellied slider turtle (Pseudemys scripta). Canadian Journal of Zoology 62: 1038–1042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nève G., Mousson L. and Baguette M. 1996. Adult dispersal and genetic structure of butterfly populations in fragmented landscape. Acta Oecologica 17: 621–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieminen M. 1996. Migration of moth species in a network of small islands. Oecologia 108: 643–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss R.F. 1991. Landscape connectivity: different functions at different scales. In: Landscape Linkages and Biodiversity, pp. 27–39. Edited by Hudson W.E. Island Press, Washington DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxley D.J., Fenton M.B. and Carmody G.R. 1974. The effects of roads on populations of small mammals. Journal of Applied Ecology. 11: 51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock M.M. and Smith A.T. 1997. The effects of habitat fragmentation on dispersal patterns, mating behavior and genetic variation in a pika (Ochotona princeps) metapopulation. Oecologia 112: 524–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett S.T.A. and Cadenasso M.L. 1995. Landscape ecology: spatial heterogeneity in ecological systems. Science 269: 331–334.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ranta E., Kaitala V. and Lundberg P. 1998. Population variability in space and time: the dynamics of synchronous population fluctuations. Oikos 83: 376–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen L.R. and Brodsgaard B. 1992. Gene flow inferred from seed dispersal and pollinator behaviour compared to DNA analysis of restriction site variation in a patchy population of Lute corniculatus L. Oecologia 89: 277–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reading C.J., Loman J. and Madsen T. 1991. Breeding pond fidelity in the common toad, Bufo bufo. Journal of Zoology, London 225: 201–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe G. and Beebee T.J.C. 2003. Population on the verge of a mutational meltdown? Fitness costs of genetic load for an amphibian in the wild. Evolution 57: 177–181.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott J.A. 1986. Butterflies of North America: A Natural History and Field Guide. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexton O.J. 1959. Spatial and temporal movements of a population of the painted turtle, Chrysemys picta marginata. Ecological Monographs 29: 113–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman P.W. and Morton M.L. 1984. Demography of Belding’s ground squirrels. Ecology 65:1617–1628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinsch U. 1992. Structure and dynamics of a natterjack toad metapopulation (Bufo calamita). Oecologia 90: 489–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinsch U. 1997. Postmetamorphic dispersal and recruitment of first breeders in a Bufo calamita metapopulation. Oecologia 112: 42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinsch U. and Seidel D. 1995. Dynamics of local and temporal breeding assemblages in a Bufo calamita metapopulation. Australian Journal of Ecology 20: 351–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith A.T. and Vrieze J.M. 1979. Population structure of everglades rodents: responses to a patchy environment. Journal of Mammalogy 60: 778–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solbreck C. and Sillen-Tullberg B. 1990. Population dynamics of a seed feeding bug, Lygaeus equestris.1. Habitat patch structure and spatial dynamics. Oikos 58: 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spendelow J.A., Nichols J.D., Nisbet I.C., Hays H., Cormons G.D., Burger J., Safina C., Hines J.E. and Gochfeld M. 1995. Estimating annual survival and movement rates of adults within a metapopulation of roseate terns. Ecology 76: 2415–2428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey P.B., Johnson V.A. and Taper M.L. 1997. Migration within metapopulations: the impact upon local population dynamics. In: Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution, pp. 267–291. Edited by Hanski I.A. and Gilpin M.E.. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen H., Ims R.A. and Sonerud G.A. 1996. Spatial and temporal patterns of small-rodent population dynamics at a regional scale. Ecology 77: 2365–2372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenseth N.C. and Lidicker Jr. W.Z. 1992. The study of dispersal: a conceptual guide. In: Animal Dispersal: Small Mammals as a Model. pp. 5–20. Edited by Stenseth N.C. and Lidicker Jr. W.Z. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suckling G.C. 1984. Population ecology of the sugar glider, Petaurus breviceps, in a system of fragmented habitats. Australian Wildlife Research 11: 49–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe O.L., Thomas C.D. and Peggie D. 1997. Area-dependent migration of ringlet butterflies generates a mixture of patchy population and metapopulation attributes. Oecologia 109: 229–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson B.W. 1998. Local dispersal and its life-history consequences in a rock pool population of a gyrinid beetle. Oikos 82: 111–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swann L.A. and Papp C.S. 1972. Common Insects of North America. Harper and Row, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swihart R.K. and Slade N.A. 1984. Road crossing in Sigmodon hispidus and Microtus ochrogaster. Journal of Mammalogy 65: 357–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szacki J. 1987. Ecological corridor as a factor determining the structure and organization of a bank vole population. Acta Theriologica 32: 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szacki J. and Liro A. 1991. Movements of small mammals in the heterogeneous landscape. Landscape Ecology 5: 219–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szacki J. 1999. Spatially structured populations: how much do they match the classic metapopulation concept? Landscape Ecology 14: 369–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D., May R.M., Lehman C.L. and Nowak M.A. 1994. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371: 65–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas C.D. and Kunin W.E. 1999. The spatial structure of populations. Journal of Animal Ecology 68: 647–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas C.F.G., Parkinson L. and Marshall E.J.P. 1998. Isolating the components of activity-density for the carabid beetle Pterostichus melanarius in farmland. Oecologia 116: 103–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Horne B. 1982. Niches of adult and juvenile deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) in seral stages of coniferous forest. Ecology 63: 992–1003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhulst S., Perrins C.M. and Riddington R.. 1997. Natal dispersal of great tits in a patchy environment. Ecology 78: 864–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verner L. and Getz L.L. 1985. Significance of dispersal in fluctuating populations of Microtus ochrogaster and M. pennsylvanicus. Journal of Mammalogy 66: 338–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weddell B.J. 1991. Distribution and movements of Columbian ground squirrels (Spermophilus columbianus (Ord)): are habitat patches like islands. Journal of Biogeography 18: 385–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens J.A. 1976. Population responses to patchy environments. Annual Review Ecology and Systematics 7: 81–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens J.A., Stenseth N.C., VanHorne B. and Ims R.A. 1993. Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology. Oikos 66: 369–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens J.A. 1994. Habitat fragmentation: island v landscape perspectives on bird conservation. Ibis 137: s97–s104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggett D.R. and Boag D.A. 1989. Intercolony natal dispersal in the Columbian ground squirrel. Canadian Journal of Zoology 67: 42–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins K.T. 1982. Highways as barriers to rodent dispersal. Southwestern Naturalist 27: 459–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams D.W. and Liebhold A.M. 2000. Spatial synchrony of spruce budworm outbreaks in Eastern North America. Ecology 81: 2753–2766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson D.E. and Ruff S. 1979. Smithsonian Book of North American Mammals. Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington, D.C. USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z. and Usher M.B. 1991. Dispersal of wood mice and bank voles in an agricultural landscape. Acta Theriologica 36: 239–245.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. David R. Bowne

    Present address: Department of Biology, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA, 23173, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Sciences and Blandy Experimental Farm, Unoversity of Virginia, Boyce, VA, 22620, USA

    David R. Bowne & Michael A. Bowers

Authors
  1. David R. Bowne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael A. Bowers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David R. Bowne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bowne, D.R., Bowers, M.A. Interpatch movements in spatially structured populations: a literature review. Landscape Ecol 19, 1–20 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAND.0000018357.45262.b9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAND.0000018357.45262.b9

Search

Navigation