Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Flexible Support of Team Processes by Adaptive Workflow Systems

  • Published:
Distributed and Parallel Databases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Process-oriented support of collaborative work is an important challenge today. At first glance, Workflow Management Systems (WfMS) seem to be very suitable tools for realizing team-work processes. However, such processes have to be frequently adapted, e.g., due to process optimizations or when process goals change. Unfortunately, runtime adaptability still seems to be an unsolvable problem for almost all existing WfMS. Usually, process changes can be accomplished by modifying a corresponding (graphical) workflow (WF) schema. Especially for long-running processes, however, it is extremely important that such changes can be propagated to already running WF instances as well, but without causing inconsistencies and errors. The paper presents a general and comprehensive correctness criterion for ensuring compliance of in-progress WF instances with a modified WF schema. For different kinds of WF schema changes, it is precisely stated, which rules and which information are needed at mininum for satisfying this criterion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Agostini and G. de Michelis, “A light workflow management system using simple process models,” Int'l Journal of Collaborative Comp., vol. 9, nos. 3/4, pp. 335–363, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Andany, M. Leonard, and C. Palisser, “Management of schema evolution in databases,” in Proc. Int'l Conf. VLDB '91, Barcelona, Sept. 1991, pp. 161–170.

  3. S. Bassil, M. Benyoucef, R. Keller, and P. Kropf, “Addressing dynamism in e-negotiations by workflow management systems,” in Proc. DEXA'2002 Workshop, Sept. 2002.

  4. T. Bauer and P. Dadam, “Efficient distributed workflow management based on variable server assignments,” in Proc. Int'l CAiSE '00, Stockholm, June 2000, pp. 94–109.

  5. F. Casati, S. Ceri, B. Pernici, and G. Pozzi, “Workflow evolution,” Data and Knowledge Engineering, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 211–238, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. F. Curbera, Y. Goland, J. Klein, F. Leymann, D. Roller, S. Thatte, and S. Weerawarana, Business Process Execution Language for Web Services, Version 1.0, 2002. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/wsbpel/.

  7. C.A. Ellis, K. Keddara, and G. Rozenberg, “Dynamic change within workflow systems,” in Proc. Int'l ACM Conf. COOCS '95, Milpitas, CA, August 1995, pp. 10–21.

  8. C.A. Ellis and C. Maltzahn, “The Chautauqua workflow system,” in Proc. Int'l Conf. on System Science, Maui, 1997.

  9. A. Fent, H. Reiter, and B. Freitag, “Design for change: Evolving workflow specifications in ULTRAflow,” in Proc. Int'l CAISE '02, May 2002, pp. 516–534.

  10. G. Joeris and O. Herzog, “Managing evolving workflow specifications,” in Proc. Int'l Conf. CoopIS '98, New York City, August 1998, pp. 310–321.

  11. K. Kochut, J. Arnold, A. Sheth, J. Miller, E. Kraemer, B. Arpinar, and J. Cardoso, “IntelliGEN: A distributed workflow system for discovering protein-protein interactions,” Distributed and Parallel Databases, vol. 13, pp. 43–72, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Kradolfer and A. Geppert, “Dynamic workflow schema evolution based on workflow type versioning and workflow migration,” in Proc. Int'l Conf. CoopIS '99, Edinburgh, Sept. 1999, pp. 104–114.

  13. F. Leymann and D. Roller, Production Workflow, Prentice Hall, 2000.

  14. R. Müller and E. Rahm, “Dealing with logical failures for collaborating workflows,” in Proc. Int'l Conf. CoopIS '00, Eilat, 2000, pp. 210–223.

  15. P. Muth, J. Weissenfels, M. Gillmann, and G. Weikum, “Workflow history management in virtual enterprises using a light-weight workflow management system,” in Proc. RIDE'99, March 1999, pp. 148–155.

  16. M. Reichert and P. Dadam, “ADEPTflex―supporting dynamic changes of workflows without losing control,” Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 93–129, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Reichert, S. Rinderle, and P. Dadam, “ADEPT workflow management system: Flexible support for enterprise-wide business processes (tool presentation),” in Proc. Int'l Conf. BPM '03, LNCS 2678, Eindhoven, Springer, June 2003, pp. 370–379.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Reichert, S. Rinderle, and P. Dadam, “A formal framework for workflow type and instance changes under correctness constraints,” Technical Report UIB-2003-01, University of Ulm, Computer Science Faculty, April 2003.

  19. S. Rinderle, M. Reichert, and P. Dadam, “Evaluation of correctness criteria for dynamic workflow changes,” in Proc. Int'l Conf. BPM '03, LNCS 2678, Eindhoven, Springer, June 2003, pp. 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Rinderle, M. Reichert, and P. Dadam, “On dealing with semantically conflicting business process changes,” Technical Report UIB-2003-04, University of Ulm, Computer Science Faculty, June 2003.

  21. S. Sadiq, O. Marjanovic, and M. Orlowska, “Managing change and time in dynamic workflow processes,” Int'l Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, vol. 9, no. 1/2, pp. 93–116, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  22. W.M.P. van der Aalst, “Exterminating the dynamic change bug: A concrete approach to support workflow change,” Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 297–317, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. W.M.P. van der Aalst and T. Basten, “Inheritance of workflows: An approach to tackling problems related to change,” Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 270, no. 1/2, pp. 125–203, 2002.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. M. Weber, Distributed Systems, Spektrum, Akademischer Verlag, 1998 (in German).

  25. M. Weske, “Flexible modeling and execution of workflow activities,” in Proc. 31st Int'l Conf. on System Sciences, Hawaii, 1998, pp. 713–722.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Science Faculty, Dept. Databases and Information Systems, University of Ulm, 89069, Ulm, Germany

    Stefanie Rinderle, Manfred Reichert & Peter Dadam

Authors
  1. Stefanie Rinderle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Manfred Reichert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peter Dadam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rinderle, S., Reichert, M. & Dadam, P. Flexible Support of Team Processes by Adaptive Workflow Systems. Distributed and Parallel Databases 16, 91–116 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:DAPD.0000026270.78463.77

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:DAPD.0000026270.78463.77

Search

Navigation