Abstract
Many consider salvage value and tourism expenditures as the only economic values of a historic shipwreck. This paper looks at one alternative, the non-market value generated by management of shipwrecks as submerged maritime cultural resources. We consider the question: How much are people willing to pay to maintain shipwrecks in their pristine state? The contingent valuation method was implemented during summer 2001 as part of a telephone survey to households in eastern North Carolina. We find that households are willing to pay about $35 in a one-time increase in state taxes. Willingness to payis internally validated by expected relationships with prices and income but fails to pass the scope test. We speculate that we inadvertently succumbed to the well-known “birds” problem. The double-bounded willingness to pay questions are not incentive compatible and are subject to starting point bias, despite efforts to minimize these effects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alberini, Anna, Kanninen, Barbara, and Carson, Richard T. (1997) “Modeling Response Incentive Effects in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Data”. Land Economics 73(3): 309–324.
Boyle, Kevin J., Desvousges, William H., Johnson, F. Reed, Dunford, Richard W., and Hudson, Sara P. (1994) “An Investigation of Part-Whole Biases in Contingent-Valuation Studies”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27(1): 64–83.
Cameron, Trudy Ann (1991) “Interval Estimates of Non-Market Resource Values from Referendum Contingent Valuation Surveys”. Land Economics 67(4): 413–421.
Cameron, Trudy Ann and James, Michele D. (1987) “Efficient Estimation Methods for ‘Closed-Ended’ Contingent Valuation Surveys”. Review of Economics and Statistics 68(2): 269–276.
Diamond, Peter A. and Hausman, Jerry A. (1994). “Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(4): 45–64.
Greene, William H. (1998) LIMDEP Version 7.0: User's Manual, revised edn. Econometric Software, Plainview, NY.
Greene, William H. (2000) Econometric Analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Hanemann, W. Michael (1994) “Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation”. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(4): 19–43.
Herriges, Joseph A. and Shogren, Jason F. (1996) “Starting Point Bias in Dichotomous Choice Valuation with Follow-Up Questioning”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30: 112–131.
Huang, Ju-Chin, Haab, Timothy C., and Whitehead, John C. (1997) “Willingness to Pay for Quality Improvements: Should Revealed and Stated Preference Data Be Combined?” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 34(3): 240–255.
Kaoru, Yoshiaki and Hoagland, Porter (1994) “The Value of Historic Shipwrecks: Conflicts and Management”. Coastal Management 22: 195–213.
Navrud, Ståle and Ready, Richard C. (eds.) (2002) Valuing Cultural Heritage: Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques to Historic Buildings, Monuments and Artifacts. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, U.K.
Randall, Alan (1998) “Beyond the Crucial Experiment: Mapping the Performance Characteristics of Contingent Valuation”. Resource and Energy Economics 20(2): 197–206.
Vrana, Kenneth J. and Halsey, John R. (1992) “Shipwreck Allocation and Management in Michigan: A Review of Theory and Practice”. Historical Archaeology 26: 81–96.
Whitehead, John C., Hoban, Thomas J., and Clifford, William B. (1994) “Specification Bias in Contingent Valuation from Omission of Relative Price Variables”. Southern Economic Journal 60(4): 995–1009.
Whitehead, John C., Haab, Timothy C., and Huang, Ju-Chin (1998) “Part-Whole Bias in Contingent Valuation: Will Scope Effects Be Detected with Inexpensive Survey Methods?” Southern Economic Journal 65(1): 160–168.
Whitehead, John C. (2002) “Incentive Incompatibility and Anchoring in Iterative Valuation Questions”. Land Economics 78(2): 285–297.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Whitehead, J.C., Finney, S.S. Willingness to Pay for Submerged Maritime Cultural Resources. Journal of Cultural Economics 27, 231–240 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026384602020
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026384602020