Skip to main content
Log in

Willingness to Pay for Submerged Maritime Cultural Resources

  • Published:
Journal of Cultural Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many consider salvage value and tourism expenditures as the only economic values of a historic shipwreck. This paper looks at one alternative, the non-market value generated by management of shipwrecks as submerged maritime cultural resources. We consider the question: How much are people willing to pay to maintain shipwrecks in their pristine state? The contingent valuation method was implemented during summer 2001 as part of a telephone survey to households in eastern North Carolina. We find that households are willing to pay about $35 in a one-time increase in state taxes. Willingness to payis internally validated by expected relationships with prices and income but fails to pass the scope test. We speculate that we inadvertently succumbed to the well-known “birds” problem. The double-bounded willingness to pay questions are not incentive compatible and are subject to starting point bias, despite efforts to minimize these effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberini, Anna, Kanninen, Barbara, and Carson, Richard T. (1997) “Modeling Response Incentive Effects in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Data”. Land Economics 73(3): 309–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, Kevin J., Desvousges, William H., Johnson, F. Reed, Dunford, Richard W., and Hudson, Sara P. (1994) “An Investigation of Part-Whole Biases in Contingent-Valuation Studies”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27(1): 64–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, Trudy Ann (1991) “Interval Estimates of Non-Market Resource Values from Referendum Contingent Valuation Surveys”. Land Economics 67(4): 413–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, Trudy Ann and James, Michele D. (1987) “Efficient Estimation Methods for ‘Closed-Ended’ Contingent Valuation Surveys”. Review of Economics and Statistics 68(2): 269–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Peter A. and Hausman, Jerry A. (1994). “Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(4): 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, William H. (1998) LIMDEP Version 7.0: User's Manual, revised edn. Econometric Software, Plainview, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, William H. (2000) Econometric Analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann, W. Michael (1994) “Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation”. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(4): 19–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herriges, Joseph A. and Shogren, Jason F. (1996) “Starting Point Bias in Dichotomous Choice Valuation with Follow-Up Questioning”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30: 112–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Ju-Chin, Haab, Timothy C., and Whitehead, John C. (1997) “Willingness to Pay for Quality Improvements: Should Revealed and Stated Preference Data Be Combined?” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 34(3): 240–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaoru, Yoshiaki and Hoagland, Porter (1994) “The Value of Historic Shipwrecks: Conflicts and Management”. Coastal Management 22: 195–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navrud, Ståle and Ready, Richard C. (eds.) (2002) Valuing Cultural Heritage: Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques to Historic Buildings, Monuments and Artifacts. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, Alan (1998) “Beyond the Crucial Experiment: Mapping the Performance Characteristics of Contingent Valuation”. Resource and Energy Economics 20(2): 197–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrana, Kenneth J. and Halsey, John R. (1992) “Shipwreck Allocation and Management in Michigan: A Review of Theory and Practice”. Historical Archaeology 26: 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, John C., Hoban, Thomas J., and Clifford, William B. (1994) “Specification Bias in Contingent Valuation from Omission of Relative Price Variables”. Southern Economic Journal 60(4): 995–1009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, John C., Haab, Timothy C., and Huang, Ju-Chin (1998) “Part-Whole Bias in Contingent Valuation: Will Scope Effects Be Detected with Inexpensive Survey Methods?” Southern Economic Journal 65(1): 160–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, John C. (2002) “Incentive Incompatibility and Anchoring in Iterative Valuation Questions”. Land Economics 78(2): 285–297.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whitehead, J.C., Finney, S.S. Willingness to Pay for Submerged Maritime Cultural Resources. Journal of Cultural Economics 27, 231–240 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026384602020

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026384602020

Navigation