Skip to main content
Log in

Chronic Illness, Treatment Choice and Workforce Participation

  • Published:
International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Choices with respect to labor force participation and medical treatment are increasingly intertwined. Technological advances present patients with new choices and may facilitate continued employment for the growing number of chronically ill individuals. We examine joint work/treatment decisions of end stage renal disease patients, a group for whom these tradeoffs are particularly salient. Using a simultaneous equations probit model, we find that treatment choice is a significant predictor of employment status. However, the effect size is considerably smaller than in models that do not consider the joint nature of these choices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beyer, D. A. (1995). “Cancer is a Chronic Disease.” Nurse Practitioner Forum 6(4), 201–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A., D. K. Guilkey and T. A. Mroz. (1995). “Binary Outcomes and Endogenous Explanatory Variables: Tests and Solutions with an Application to the Demand for Contraceptive use in Tunisia.” Demography 32, 111–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, J. and B. Madrian. (1999). “Health, Health Insurance and the Labor Market.” In O. Ashenfelter and D. Card (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 3. Elsevier Science, pp. 3309–3416.

  • Curtin, R. B., E. T. Oberley and P. Sacksteder. (1996). “Friedman A. Differences between Employed and Nonemployed Dialysis Patients.” American Journal of Kidney Diseases 27(4), 533–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettner, S. L. (2000). “The Relationship between Labor Market Outcomes and Mental and Physical Health: Exogenous Human Capital or Endogenous Health Production?” In Salkever and Sorkin (eds.), The Economics of Disability, Series on Research in Human Capital and Development. JAI Press.

  • Ettner, S. L., R. Frank and R. Kessler. (1997). “The Impact of Psychiatric Disorder on Labor Market Outcomes.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 51(1), 64–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J. A. (1978). “Specification Tests in Econometrics.” Econometrica 49, 1251–1271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, R., B. Wolfe, B. Kreider and M. Stone. (1994). “Market Work, Wages and Men's Health.” Journal of Health Economics 13, 163–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holley, J. L. and S. Nespor. (1994). “An Analysis of Factors Affecting Employment of Chronic Dialysis Patients.” American Journal of Kidney Diseases 23(5), 681–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julius, M., J. D. Kneisley, P. Carpentier-Alting, V. M. Hawthorne, R. A. Wolfe and F. K. Port. (1989). “A Comparison of Employment Rates of Patients Treated with Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis vs. In-Center Hemodialysis (Michigan End-Stage Renal Disease Study).” Archives of Internal Medicine 149(4), 839–842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutner, N. G., D. Brogan and B. Fielding. (1991). “Employment Status and Ability toWork AmongWorking-Age Chronic Dialysis Patients.” American Journal of Nephrology 11(4), 334–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. (1982). “Health andWages: A Simultaneous Equation Model with Multiple Discrete Indicators.” International Economic Review 23, 199–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClellan, M., B. J. McNeil and J. P. Newhouse. (1994). “Does More Intensive Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Elderly Reduce Mortality? Analysis Using Instrumental Variables.” Journal of the American Medical Association 272, 859–866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelssohn, D. C. (2002). “Reflections on the Optimal Dialysis Modality Distribution: A North American Perspective.” Nephrology News and Issues 16, 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissenson, A. R. (2002). “What Other Factors Influence Modality Choice?” Nephrology News and Issues 16, 27–28

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Renal Data System. (1997). “USRDS 1997 Annual Data Report.” National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Renal Data System. (2001). “USRDS 2001 Annual Data Report.” National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Renal Data System. (2002). “USRDS 2002 Annual Data Report.” National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, D. L. and A. R. Nissenson. (1988). “Quality of Life in Chronic Dialysis Patients:ACritical Comparison of Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD) and Hemodialysis.” American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 11(5), 402–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S. and A. Green. (2000). Projection of Chronic Illness Prevalence and Cost Inflation. Santa Monica, California: RAND Health.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard A. Hirth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hirth, R.A., Chernew, M.E., Turenne, M.N. et al. Chronic Illness, Treatment Choice and Workforce Participation. International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics 3, 167–181 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025332802736

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025332802736

Navigation