Skip to main content
Log in

The Evolution and Nature of Young Firm Networks: a longitudinal Perspective

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes the evolution of networks during the first three years after start-up and puts forward explanations of the nature of networks of young firms after three years. We extend current research on networks by explicitly including both temporal change and spatial variation in our analyses of the longitudinal dataset. In this paper we define networks as: the main business relationships with respect to sales, supply, outsourcing and cooperation. The nature of these business relationships is specified by four main characteristics: type, number, source, and location. The longitudinal network analysis is therefore at the micro-level: the individual young firm and the characteristics of its most important business contacts are central. In contrast to the literature our analyses show that sales relationships become increasingly social in source during the first three years after start-up. We also find a persistent geographical concentration strategy in the main business relationships. It seems that extra-regional relationships are losing ground to intra-regional relationships over time: firms are narrowing their spatial scope in their first three years. In addition, we trace important effects of gender, education, innovative firm behaviour, region and sector on the nature of young firm networks three years after start-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldrich, H. E., 1999, Organizations Evolving, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff, H. I., 1984, Implanting Strategic Management, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Araujo, L. and G. Easton, 1996, ‘Networks in Socioeconomic Systems’, in D. Iacobucci (eds.), Networks in Marketing, London: Sage, pp. 63-107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baines, S. and J. Wheelock, 1999, ‘Working For Each Other: Gender, the Household and Micro-business Survival and Growth’, International Small Business Journal 17, 16-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, J., 1999, ‘Agency, Entrepreneurs, and Institutional Change. The Role of Strategic Choice and Institutionalized Practices in Organizations’, Organization Studies 20, 777-799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, H., N. G. Noorderhaven and B. Nooteboom, 1995, ‘Determinants of Supplier Dependence: An Empirical Study’, in J. Groenewegen, Ch. Pitelis and S.-E. Sjostrand (eds.), On Economic Institutions; Theory and Applications, Aldershot: Edward Elgar, pp. 195-212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birley, S., 1985, ‘The Role of Networks in the Entrepreneurial Process’, Journal of Business Venturing 1, 107-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birley, S., S. Cromie and A. Myers, 1991, ‘Entrepreneurial Networks: Their Emergence in Ireland and Overseas’, International Small Business Journal 9, 57-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramanti, A. and R. Ratti, 1997, ‘The Multi-Faced Dimensions of Local Development’, in R. Ratti, A. Bramanti and R. Gordon (eds.), The Dynamics of Innovative Regions: The GREMI Approach, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 3-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brüderl, J., P. Preisendorfer and R. Ziegler, 1992, ‘Survival Chances of Newly Founded Business Organizations’, American Sociological Review 57, 227-242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brüderl, J. and P. Preisendorfer, 1998, ‘Network Support and the Success of Newly Founded Businesses’, Small Business Economics 10, 213-225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. E. and G. S. Hansen, 1991, ‘Network Evolution, Entrepreneurial Success, and Regional Development’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 3, 1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camagni, R., 1995, ‘Global Network and Local Milieu: Towards a Theory of Economic Space’, in S. Conti, E. J. Malecki and P. Oinas (eds.), The Industrial Enterprise and its Environment: Spatial Perspectives, Aldershot: Avebury, pp. 195-214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P. and K. Morgan, 1993, ‘The Network Paradigm: New Departures in Corporate and Regional Development’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 11, 543-564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, S. L., 1995, ‘Marketing Matters: The Function of Markets and Marketing in the Growth of Firms and Industries’, Progress in Human Geography 19, 317-337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, J. and R. Blackburn, 1994, Small Firms and Local Economic Networks.The Death of the Local Economy?, London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicken, P. and N. Thrift, 1992, ‘The Organization of Production and the Production of Organization: Why 132 Veronique Schutjens and Erik StamBusiness Enterprises Matter in the Study of Geographical Industrialization’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 17, 279-291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donckels, R. and J. Lambrecht, 1995, ‘Networks and Small Business Growth: An Explanatory Model’, Small Business Economics 7, 273-289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, M. and R. Lukas, 1999, ‘Innovation, Cooperation, and the Region’, in D. B. Audretsch and A. R. Thurik (eds.), Innovation, Industry Evolution, and Employment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 157-181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnsey, E., 1998, ‘A Theory of the Early Growth of the Firm’, Industrial and Corporate Change 7, 523-556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W. B., 1988, ‘ “Who is an Entrepreneur?” Is the Wrong Question’, American Journal of Small Business 12, 11-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, A. A. and L. G. Davies, 1991, ‘Methodological Problems in the Development and Testing of a Growth Model of Business Enterprise Development’, in L. G. Davies and A. A. Gibb (eds.), Recent Research in Entrepreneurship, Aldershot: Avebury, pp. 286-323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorton, M., 1999, ‘Spatial Variations in Markets Served by U.K.-based Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs)’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 11, 39-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M., 1985, ‘Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology 91, 481-510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M., 1992, ‘Problems of Explanation in Economic Sociology’, in N. Nohria and R. G. Eccles (eds.), Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 25-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M., 1993, ‘The Nature of Economic Relationships’, in R. Swedberg (ed.), Explorations in Economic Sociology, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 3-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, E. L., 1995, ‘Entrepreneurial Networks and New Organization Growth’, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 19, 7-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, U., 1996, Neither Industrial District Nor Innovative Milieu: Entrepreneurs and their Contexts.An Actor-oriented Framework and Case Studies from Greater London and Zurich, Zurich: 36th European Congress Regional Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooimeijer, P. and B. Van der Knaap, 1994, ‘From Flows of People to Networks of Behaviour’, in P. Hooimeijer, B. Van der Knaap, J. Van Weesep and R. I. Woods (eds.), Population Dynamics in Europe, Utrecht: Royal Netherlands Geographical Society, pp. 177-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannisson, B., 1995, ‘Paradigms and Entrepreneurial Networks-Some Methodological Challenges’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 7, 215-231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannisson, B., 1996, ‘The Dynamics of Entrepreneurial Networks’, in P. D. Reynolds, S. Birley, J. E. Butler, W. D. Bygrave, P. Davidsson, W. B. Gartner and P. P. McDougall (eds.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 1996, Babson Park, MA: Babson College, pp. 253-267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannisson, B., 1998, ‘Personal Networks in Emerging Knowledge-based Firms: Spatial and Functional Patterns’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 10, 297-313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeble, D., 1997, ‘Small Firms, Innovation and Regional Development in Britain in the 1990s’, Regional Studies 31, 281-293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M., 1979, Perceptions, Opportunity and Profit, Studies in the Theory of Entrepreneurship, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschatzky, K. and A. Zenker, 1999, The Regional Embeddedness of Small Manufacturing and Service Firms: Regional Networking as Knowledge Source for Innovation?, Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, A., 1992, ‘Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange of Relationships’, Administrative Science Quarterly 37, 76-104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, A. and J. A. Starr, 1992, ‘A Network Model of Organization Formation’, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 17, 5-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littunen, H. and T. Tohmo, 2000, The High Growth of New Firms in a Changing Environment, Uddevalla/Trollhättan: Uddevalla Symposium 2000.

  • Malecki, E. J. and M. E. Veldhoen, 1993, ‘Network Activities, Information and Competitiveness in Small Firms’, Geografiska Annaler 75B, 131-147.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, P. and M. J. Taylor, 1982, Industrial Organization and Location, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, 1999, High-Growth SMEs and Employment.Detailed Outline of the Synthesis Report, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, F. W., 1985, ‘The Use of Matched-pairs Research Design in Industrial Surveys’, Environment and Planning A 17, 981-989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. T., 1959, The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, London: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, Y. M., 2000, MKB-kenniscirkels: waar zoekt het MKB welke kennis?, Zoetermeer: EIM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratti, R., 1991, ‘Small and Medium-size Enterprises, Local Synergies and Spatial Cycles of Innovation’, in R. Camagni (ed.), Innovation Networks-Spatial Perspectives, London: Belhaven Press, pp. 71-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A., 1934, The Theory of Economic Development.An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press (first edition in German 1909).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutjens, V. A. J. M. and E. Wever, 2000, ‘Determinants of New Firm Success’, Papers in Regional Science 79, 135-153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. J., 1988, Metropolis.From the Division of Labor to Urban Form, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedaitis, J. B., 1997, ‘Network Dynamics of New Firm Formation: Developing Russian Commodity Markets’, in G. Grabher and D. Stark (eds.), Restructuring Networks in Post-Socialism.Legacies, Linkages, and Localities, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 137-157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, E., 1997, ‘New Start, Growth and Development. The 'Real' Networks of Small Firms’, in D. Deakins, P. Jennings and C. M. Mason (eds.), Small Firms: Entrepreneurship in the Nineties, London: Paul Chapman Publishing, pp. 7-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöstrand, S.-E., 1993, ‘The Socioeconomic Institutions of Organizing: Origin, Emergence, and Reproduction’, Journal of Socio-Economics 22, 323-351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigter, H., 1998, Bedrijven op weg naar volwassenheid. Resultaten van de vierde peiling van het EIM-starterscohort(Firms on the Way to Maturity. Results of the Fourth Monitor of the EIM Starters Cohort), Zoetermeer, EIM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. L., 1965, ‘Social Structure and Organizations’, in J. G. March (ed.), Handbook of Organizations, Chicago: Rand McNally, pp. 142-193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M., 1997, The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy, New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, G. P., 1987, Innovation, Entrepreneurs and Regional Development, London: Frances Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. J. and P. Wood, 1973, ‘Industrial Linkage and Local Agglomeration in the West Midlands Metal Industries’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 60, 129-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. J., 1975, ‘Organizational Growth, Spatial Interaction and Location Decision-Making’, Regional Studies 9, 313-323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B., 1996, ‘The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect’, American Sociological Review 61, 674-698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B., 1997, ‘Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness’, Administrative Science Quarterly 42, 35-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaessen, P. M. M. V. and E. Wever, 1993, ‘Spatial Responsiveness of Small Firms’, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 84, 119-131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Praag, M. C., 1996, Determinants of Successful Entrepreneurship, Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wever, E. and E. Stam, 1999, ‘Clusters of High Technology SMEs: The Dutch Case’, Regional Studies 33, 391-400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, H. W., 1994, ‘Critical Reviews of Geographical Perspectives on Business Organizations and the Organization of Production: Towards a Network Approach’, Progress in Human Geography 18, 460-490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, H.W., 1998, ‘The Social-spatial Constitution of Business Organizations: A Geographical Perspective’, Organization 5, 101-128.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schutjens, V., Stam, E. The Evolution and Nature of Young Firm Networks: a longitudinal Perspective. Small Business Economics 21, 115–134 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025093611364

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025093611364

Keywords

Navigation