Skip to main content
Log in

Co-planar crack interaction in cleaved mica

  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have performed a combined experimental and analytical study of cleavage in mica using a double cantilever beam geometry in which a crack induced by a wedge driven into one side of the specimen interacts with a pre-existing, coplanar, internal crack. The internal crack is produced by inserting a fiber into the sample on the cleavage plane. As the wedge-driven crack approaches the internal crack, its growth is retarded by the defect, producing an increase in the apparent fracture resistance. With continued loading, the two cracks coalesce. The experiment has been analyzed using a cohesive zone approach to represent the interlayer adhesion in mica. Analysis of the various stages of the experiment reveal scaling dependencies of the different cohesive zone parameters. The coalescence event has been found to depend on parameters other than the fracture resistance of the interface, making it useful for determining additional parameters in the cohesive description, such as the characteristic opening to failure or the cohesive stress. Analysis of the coalescence event is reproduced with finite element calculations. The interaction experiment allows multiple parameters to be determined in a single experiment using a single sample. In our experiments, we observe an increase in the apparent fracture resistance without introducing additional mechanisms for dissipation. Our results reveal the nature of this pinning mechanism and its strength in terms of cohesive fracture parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey, A. and Kay, S. (1967). A direct measurement of the influence of vapour, of liquid, and of oriented monolayers on the interfacial energy of mica. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A301, 1464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barenblatt, G. (1959). The formation of equilibrium cracks during brittle fracture: general ideas and hypotheses, axially symmetric cracks. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (PMM) 23, 622–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P., Taylor, L. and Guthshall, P. (1963). Cleavage studies of lamellar solids in various gas environments. In: Transactions of the 10th National Vacuum Symposium.

  • Dugdale, D. (1960). Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 8, 100–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keegstra, P. (1976). A transient finite element crack propagation method for nuclear pressure vessels steels. Journal of the Institution of Nuclear Engineers 17, 89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, P., Foulk, J., Chen, E., Wimmer, S. and Gao, H. (2001). Physics-based modeling of brittle fracture: cohesive formulations and the application of meshfree methods. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics 37, 99– 166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi, A., Emery, A. and Mall, S. (1976). Dynamic finite element and photoelastic analyses of two fracture Homalite-100 plates. Experimental Mechanics 16, 321–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawn, B. (1993). Fracture of Brittle Solids. 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, L. and Grimsditch, M. (1993). Elastic moduli of muscovite mica. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 5, 1681–1690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obreimoff, J.. (1930). The splitting strength of mica. Proceedings of The Royal Society of London A215, 905.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, M. and Suresh, S. (1993). Statistical properties of residual stresses and intergranular fracture in ceramic materials. Journal of Applied Mechanics 60, 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prandtl, L. (1933). GeEin Gedankenmodell für den Zerreiβvorgang spröder Körper. Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik 13, 129–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahul-Kumar, P., Jagota, A., Bennison, S. and Saigal, S. (2000). Cohesive modeling of viscoelastic fracture: application to peel testing of polymers. International Journal of Solids and Structures 37, 1873–1897.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J. (1968). Mathematical analysis in the mechanics of fracture. In: Fracture: An Advanced Treatise (edited by H. Liebowitz), Vol. 2. New York, Academic Press, pp. 191–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rydholm, G., Fredriksson, B. and Nilsson, F. (1978). Numerical investigation of rapid crack propagation. In: Numerical Methods in Fracture Mechanics (edited by Luxmoore, A. and Owen, D.), pp. 660–672, Pineridge Press.

  • Wan, K., Lathabai, S. and Lawn, B. (1990), Crack velocity functions and thresholds in brittle solids. Journal of the European Ceramic Society 6, 259–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan, K. and Lawn, B. (1992). Effect of chemical interaction on Barenblatt crack profiles in brittle solids. Acta Metallurgica et Materialia 40, 3331–3337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan, K., Lawn, B. and Horn, R. (1992). Repulsive interaction between coplanar cracks in the double-cantilever geometry. Journal of Materials Research 7, 1584–1588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, J. (1967). A comparison of the fracture criteria of Griffith and Barenblatt. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 15, 151–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, X.-P. and Needleman, A. (1994). Numerical simulations of fast crack growth in brittle solids. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 42, 1397–1434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, X.-P. and Needleman, A. (1996). Numerical simulations of crack growth along an interface. International Journal of Fracture 74, 289–324

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hill, J., Bennison, S., Klein, P. et al. Co-planar crack interaction in cleaved mica. International Journal of Fracture 119, 365–386 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024975728664

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024975728664

Navigation