Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Value Priorities, Partisanship and Electoral Choice: The Neglected Case of the United States

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A wealth of comparative scholarship indicates that a transformation in the value priorities of Western publics has been occurring during the last quarter century, and that value-based cleavages are increasingly coming to structure Western political behavior. The United States, however, has been conspicuous by its relative absence from this research enterprise. This paper attempts to partially fill this void in the literature by examining the impact of materialist-postmaterialist value priorities on American political behavior. Using data from the 1972 through 1992 American National Election Studies, we first compare the impact of the value-based cleavage on partisanship and presidential vote choice to that of other relevant sociodemographic variables. These analyses show that the effect of postmaterialism on American political behavior is not negligible. When the parties take distinct stances on postmaterial concerns, value type exerts a noticeable, though not overwhelming, influence on partisanship and vote choice. Further analyses show that the effect of value priorities on electoral behavior is mainly indirect, as they significantly shape attitudes on defense and racial issues, which in turn influence vote choice. Surprisingly, however, value type is not related to attitudes on cultural issues such as abortion and homosexual rights. Thus, although postmaterialism does have some relevance for American political attitudes and behavior, it does not seem to be pertinent to the cultural conflicts that are increasingly salient to American political life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abramowitz, Alan I. (1994). Issue evolution reconsidered: Racial attitudes and partisanship in the U.S. electorate. American Journal of Political Science 38: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramowitz, Alan I. (1995). It's abortion stupid: Policy voting in the 1992 presidential election. Journal of Politics 57: 176–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramson, Paul R., John H. Aldrich, and David W. Rohde (1986). Change and Continuity in the 1984 Elections. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramson, Paul R., John H. Aldrich, and David W. Rohde (1990). Change and Continuity in the 1988 Elections. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramson, Paul R., and Ronald Inglehart (1986). Generational replacement and value change in six West European societies. American Journal of Political Science 30: 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramson, Paul R., and Ronald Inglehart (1987). Generational replacement and the future of postmaterialist values. Journal of Politics 49: 231–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramson, Paul R., and Ronald Inglehart (1994). Education, security, and post-materialism: A comment on Duch and Taylor's “Postmaterialism and the Economic Condition.” American Journal of Political Science 38: 797–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramson, Paul R., and Ronald Inglehart (1995). Value Change in Global Perspective. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, John D., and Forrest D. Nelson (1984). Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Kendall L., Russel J. Dalton, and Kai Hildebrandt (1981). Germany Transformed: Political Culture and the New Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Tod A., and Robert P. Steed (1992). Party activists, Southern religion, and culture wars: An analysis of precinct party activists in eleven Southern states. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Atlanta.

  • Beck, Paul Allen (1984). The electoral cycle and patterns of American politics. In Richard G. Niemi and Herbert F. Weisberg (eds.), Controversies in Voting Behavior, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobo, Lawrence, and James R. Kleugel (1991). Opposition to race-targeting: Self-interest, stratification ideology, or racial attitudes. American Sociological Review 58: 443–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Robert D., and Edward G. Carmines (1995). Materialists, postmaterialists, and the criteria for political choice in U.S. presidential elections. Journal of Politics 57: 483–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes (1960). The American Voter. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, Edward G., and James A. Stimson (1989). Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Harold D., and Nitish Dutt (1991). Measuring value change in Western industrialized societies: The impact of unemployment. American Political Science Review 85: 905–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, Pamela Johnston (1988). Feminists and the gender gap. Journal of Politics 50: 985–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Elizabeth Adell, Ted G. Jelen, and Clyde Wilcox (1993). Generational differences in attitudes toward abortion. In Malcolm L. Goggin (ed.), Understanding the New Politics of Abortion. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Elizabeth Adell, Ted G. Jelen, and Clyde Wilcox (1994). Issue voting in gubernatorial elections: Abortion and post-Webster politics.” Journal of Politics 56: 187–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, Russell J. (1977). Was there a revolution? A note on generational versus lifecycle explanations of value differences. Comparative Political Studies 9: 459–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, Russell J. (1987). Generational change in elite political beliefs: The growth of ideological polarization. Journal of Politics 49: 976–997.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Graff, Nan Dirk (1988). Postmaterialism and the Stratification Process. Utrecht: Interdisplinair Sociaal-wetenschappelijk anderzoeksinsitut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, Anthony (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duch, Raymond M., and Michaell A. Taylor (1993). Postmaterialism and the economic condition. American Journal of Political Science 37: 747–779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duch, Raymond M., and Michaell A. Taylor (1994). A reply to Abramson and Inglehart's “Education, Security, and Postmaterialism.” American Journal of Political Science 38: 815–824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duverger, Maurice (1954). Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern States. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Stanley (1987). Structure and consistency in public opinion: The role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science 31: 416–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fite, David, Marc Genest, and Clyde Wilcox (1990). Gender differences in foreign policy attitudes: A longitudinal analysis. American Politics Quarterly 18: 492–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeley, Andrew M. (1989). Religious Change in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Donald Philip, and Jack Citrin (1994). Measurement error and the structure of attitudes: Are positive and negative judgements opposites? American Journal of Political Science 38: 256–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, John C., James L. Guth, and Cleveland R. Fraser (1991). Apostles and apostates? Religion and politics among party activists. In Guth and Green (eds.), The Bible and the Ballot Box: Religion and Politics in the 1988 Election. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, Anna (1994). Family values, the church and the African-American community. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York.

  • Greene, William H. (1990). Econometric Analysis. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guth, James L., Ted G. Jelen, Lyman A. Kellstedt, Corwin E. Smidt, and Kenneth D. Wald (1988). The politics of religion in America: Issues for investigation. American Politics Quarterly 16: 357–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertzke, Allen D. (1991). Harvest of discontent: Religion and populism in the 1988 presidential campaign. In Guth and Green (eds.), The Bible and the Ballot Box: Religion and Politics in the 1988 Election. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himmelstein, Jerome L., and James A. McRae (1988). Social conservatism, new Republicans, and the 1980 election. Public Opinion Quarterly 48: 592–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, Susan, and Robert Sims (1993). Abortion attitudes and the Louisiana governor's election. American Politics Quarterly 21: 54–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckfeldt, Robert, and Carol Weitzel Kohfeld (1989). Race and the Decline of Class in American Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurwitz, Jon, and Mark Peffley (1990). Public images of the Soviet Union: The impact on foreign policy attitudes. Journal of Politics 52: 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Ronald (1971). The silent revolution in Europe: Intergenerational change in postindustrial societies. American Political Science Review 65: 991–1017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Ronald (1977). The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Ronald (1979). Value priorities and socioeconomic change. In Samuel H. Barnes and Max Kaase (eds.), Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Ronald (1981). Post-materialism in an environment of insecurity. American Political Science Review 75: 880–900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Ronald (1982). Value change in Japan and the West. Comparative Political Studies 14: 445–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Ronald (1990). Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Ronald, and Paul R. Abramson (1994). Economic security and value change. American Political Science Review 88: 336–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Ronald, and Scott C. Flanagan (1987). Value change in industrial societies. American Political Science Review 81: 1289–1319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Ronald, and Hans D. Klingemann (1976). Party identification, ideological preference and the left-right dimension among western mass publics.” In Ian Budge, Ivor Crewe, and Dennis Farlie (eds.), Party Identification and Beyond: Representations of Voting and Party Competition. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Ronald, and Jacques-Rene Rabier (1986). Political realignment in advanced industrial societies. From class-based politics to quality-of-life politics. Government and Opposition 21: 456–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelen, Ted (1991). The Political Mobilization of Religious Beliefs. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, Donald L., and D. Roderick Kiewiet (1979). Economic discontent and political behavior: The role of personal grievances and collective economic judgments in congressional elections. American Journal of Political Science 23: 495–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, Donald R., and D. Roderick Kiewiet (1984). Sociotropic politics: The American case. In Richard G. Niemi and Herbert F. Weisberg (eds.), Controversies in Voting Behavior, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, Jeane (1976). The New Presidential Elite: Men and Women in National Politics. New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Ethel (1985). The gender gap: Different issues, different answers. Brookings Review 3: 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, Everett Carl, Jr., with Charles D. Hadley (1975). Transformations of the American Party System. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layman, Geoffrey C. (1994). Parties and “culture wars”: The cultural division of the parties' elites. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York.

  • Layman, Geoffrey C., and Edward G. Carmines (1997). Cultural Conflicts in American Politics: Religious Traditionalism, Postmaterialism, and U.S. Political Behavior. Journal of Politics 59: 751–777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymour M., and Stein Rokkan (1967). Cleavage structures, party systems and voter alignments. In Lipset and Rokkan (eds.), Party Systems and Voter Alignments. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, Gregory B., and Philip E. Converse (1984). A dynamic simultaneous equation model of electoral choice. In Richard G. Niemi and Herbert F. Weisberg (eds.), Controversies in Voting Behavior, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Arthur H. (1978). Partisanship reinstated? A comparison of the 1972 and 1976 U.S. presidential elections. British Journal of Political Science 8: 129–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Arthur H., and Warren E. Miller (1975). Issues, candidates and partisan divisions in the 1972 American presidential election. British Journal of Political Science 5: 393–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Warren E., and Teresa E. Levitin (1976). Leadership and Change: Presidential Elections from 1952 to 1976. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Warren E., and J. Merrill Shanks (1982). Policy directions and presidential leadership: Alternative interpretations for the 1980 presidential election. British Journal of Political Science 12: 299–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, Norman H., Sidney Verba, and John R. Petrocik (1976). The Changing American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, Benjamin I., and Richard A. Brody (1972). Policy voting and the electoral process: The Vietnam War issue. American Political Science Review 66: 979–995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, Benjamin I., and Calvin C. Jones (1984). Reciprocal effects of policy preferences, party loyalties, and the vote. In Richard G. Niemi and Herbert F. Weisberg (eds.), Controversies in Voting Behavior. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peffley, Mark, and Jon Hurwitz (1992). International events and foreign policy beliefs: Public response to changing Soviet-U.S. relations. American Journal of Political Science 36: 431–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • RePass, David E. (1971). Issue salience and party choice. American Political Science Review 65: 389–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, Byron E. (1985). The new cultural politics. PS 18: 221–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, Byron E. (1991). The notion of an electoral order: The structure of electoral politics at the accession of George Bush. In Shafer (ed.), The End of Realignment? Interpreting American Electoral Eras. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, J. Merrill, and Warren E. Miller (1990). Policy direction and performance evaluation: Complimentary explanations of the Reagan elections. British Journal of Political Science 20: 143–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smidt, Corwin (1988). “Praise the Lord” politics: A comparative analysis of the social characteristics and political views of American evangelical and charismatic Christians. Sociological Analysis 50: 53–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sniderman, Paul M., Edward G. Carmines, Philip E. Tetlock, and Anthony M. Tyler (1993). The asymmetry of race as a political issue: Prejudice, political ideology, and the structure of conflict in American politics. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.

  • Sundquist, James L. (1983). Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Deth, Jan W. (1989). Fighting a Trojan horse: The persistance and change of political orientations. In Harry Ganzeboom and Hendrick Flap (eds.), New Social Movements and Value Change. Amsterdam: SISWO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wattenberg, Martin P., and Arthur H. Miller (1981). Decay in regional party coalitions: 1952–1980. In Seymour Martin Lipset (ed.), Party Coalitions in the 1980s. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, Clyde (1986). Evangelicals and fundamentalists in the new Christian right: Religious differences in the Ohio moral majority. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 25: 355–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, Clyde (1989). Popular support for the new Christian right. Social Science Journal 26: 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, Clyde (1990). Religion and politics among white evangelicals: The impact of religious variables on political attitudes. Review of Religious Research 32: 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, Clyde (1991). Religion and electoral politics among black Americans in 1988. In James L. Guth and John C. Green (eds.), The Bible and the Ballot Box: Religion and Politics in the 1988 Election. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. B. (1974). Beliefs about the welfare poor. Sociology and Social Research 58: 163–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirls, Daniel (1986). Reinterpreting the gender gap. Public Opinion Quarterly 50: 316–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, James (1993). Tension in the party system: The social and cultural issue agenda. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.

  • Wright, Gerald C., Jr. (1977). Racism and welfare policy in America. Social Science Quarterly 57: 718–730.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47405

    Edward G. Carmines (Rudy Professor)

Authors
  1. Edward G. Carmines
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Geoffrey C. Layman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carmines, E.G., Layman, G.C. Value Priorities, Partisanship and Electoral Choice: The Neglected Case of the United States. Political Behavior 19, 283–316 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024899805067

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024899805067

Keywords

Search

Navigation