Abstract
Thirty-six enclosures, surface area 4 m2, were placed in Little Mere, a shallow fertile lake in Cheshire, U.K. The effects of different fish species (common carp, common bream, tench and roach) of zooplanktivorous size, and their biomass (0, 200 and 700 kg ha−1) on water chemistry, zooplankton and phytoplankton communities were investigated. Fish biomass had a strong effect on mean zooplankton size and abundance. When fish biomass rose, larger zooplankters were replaced by more numerous smaller zooplankters. Consequently phytoplankton abundance rose in the presence of higher densities of zooplanktivorous fish, as zooplankton grazing was reduced. Fish species were also significant in determining zooplankton community size structure. In enclosures with bream there were significantly greater densities of small zooplankters than in enclosures stocked with either carp, tench and, in part, roach. When carp or roach were present, the phytoplankton had a greater abundance of Cyanophyta than when bream or tench were present. Whilst top-down effects of fish predation controlled the size partitioning of the zooplankton community, this, in turn apparently controlled the bottom-up regeneration of nutrients for the phytoplankton community. At the zooplankton–phytoplankton interface, both top-down and bottom-up processes were entwined in a reciprocal feedback mechanism with the extent and direction of that relationship altered by changes in fish species. This has consequences for the way that top-down and bottom-up processes are generalised.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartell, S. M., 1981. Potential impact of size selective planktivory on P release by zooplankton. Hydrobiologia 80: 139-146.
Bottrell, H. H., A. Duncan, Z. M. Gliwicz, E. Grygierek, A. Herzig, A. Hillbright-Ilkowska, H. Kurasawa, P. Larsson & T. Weglenska, 1976. A review of some problems in zooplankton production studies. Norw. J. Zool. 24: 420-456.
Brooks, J. L. & S. I. Dodson, 1965. Predation, body size and composition of plankton. Science 150: 28-35.
Burns, C. W., 1968. The relationship between body size and filterfeeding Cladocera and the maximum size of particle ingested. Limnol. Oceanogr. 12: 675-678.
Burns, C. W., 1969. Relation between filtering rate, temperature and body size in four species of Daphnia. Limnol. Oceanogr. 14: 693-700.
Carpenter, S. R. & J. F. Kitchell, 1992. Trophic cascade and biomanipulation: Interface of research and management - A reply to the comment by de Melo et al. Limnol. Oceanogr. 37: 208-213.
Carpenter, S. R., J. F. Kitchell & J. R. Hodgson, 1985. Cascading trophic interactions and lake productivity. Biosciences 35: 634- 639.
De Bernardi, R., 1984. Methods for the estimation of zooplankton abundance. In Downing, J. A. & F. H. A. Rigler (eds), Manual on Methods for the Assessment of Secondary Productivity in Fresh Waters. 2nd edn. International Biological Programme Handbook no. 17. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford: 501 pp.
De Bernardi, R., G. Giussani & E. Lasso Pedretti, 1981. The significance of blue-green algae as food for filter-feeding zooplankton: experimental studies on Daphnia spp. fed by Microcystis aeruginosa. Verh. int Ver. theor. ang. Limnol. 21: 477-483.
De Melo, R., R. France & D. J. McQueen, 1992. Biomanipulation: Hit or myth? Limnol. Oceanogr. 37: 192-207.
Dodson, S. I., 1974. Zooplankton competition and predation: an experimental test of the size efficiency hypothesis. Ecology 55: 605-613.
Dumont, H. J., I. Van de Velde & S. Dumont, 1975. The dry weight estimation of biomass in a selection of Cladocera, Copepoda and Rotifera from the plankton, periphyton and benthos of continental waters. Oecologia 19: 75-97.
Duncan, A., 1997. Quantifying the fish-zooplankton interaction as an ecosystem response. A historical account of the 16th PEG Meeting 1984. Arch. Hydrobiol. Spec. Issues Adv. Limnol. 49: 139-152.
Ganon, J. E. & S. A. Ganon, 1975. Observations on the narcotization of crustacean zooplankton. Crustaceana 28: 220-224.
Gentile, J. H. & T. E. Maloney, 1969. Toxicity and environmental requirements of a strain of Aphanizomenon flos-aquae (L.) Ralfs. Can. J. Microbiol. 15: 165-173.
Gibson, C. E., 1971. Nutrient limitation. J.Wat poll. Contr. Fed. 43: 2436-2440.
Giles, N., 1998. Freshwater fisheries and wildlife conservation, a good practice guide. Environment Agency Publication, Bristol: 38 pp.
Gliwicz, Z. M., 1977. Food size selection and seasonal succession of filter feeding zooplankton in a eutrophic lake. Ecol. Pol. 25: 179-225.
Harding, J. P. & W. A. Smith, 1974. A Key to the British Freshwater Cyclopoid and Calanoid Copepods. 2nd edn. Freshwater Biological Association Scientific Publication no. 18. Titus Wilson & Son ltd., Kendal: 56 pp.
Hrbacek, J., K. Bvorakova, V. Korinek & L. Prochazkova, 1961. Demonstration of the effect of the fish stock on the species composition of the zooplankton and the intensity of metabolism of the whole plankton association. Verh. int. Ver. theor. ang. Limnol. 14: 192-195.
Irvine, K., B. Moss & H. Balls, 1989. The loss of submerged plants with eutrophication II. Relationships between fish and zooplankton in a set of experimental ponds and conclusions. Freshwat. Biol. 22: 89-107.
Lampert, W., 1977. Studies on the carbon balance on Daphnia pulex as related to environmental conditions. II. The dependence of carbon assimilation on animal size, temperature, food concentration and diet species. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 48: 310-335.
Lazzaro, X., 1987. A review of planktivorous fishes: Their evolution, feeding behaviours, selectivities and impacts. Hydrobiologia 146: 97-167.
Lazzaro, X., R. W. Drenner, R. A. Stein & J. D. Smith, 1992. Planktivores and plankton dynamics: effects of fish biomass and planktivore type. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 49: 1466-1473.
Lund, J. W. G., C. Kipling & E. D. le Cren, 1958. The inverted microscope method of estimating algal numbers and the statistical basis of estimations by counting. Hydrobiologia 11: 143-170.
Lynch, M., 1979. Predation, competition and zooplankton community structure: an experimental study. Limnol. Oceanogr. 24: 253-272.
Lynch, M. & J. Shapiro, 1981. Predation, enrichment and phytoplankton community structure.Limnol. Oceanogr. 26: 1, 86-102.
Marsden, M. W., 1989. Lake restoration by reducing external phosphorus loading: the influence of sediment phosphorus release. Freshwat. Biol. 21: 139-162.
McQueen, D. J., 1990. Manipulating lake community structure: where do we go from here? Freshwat. Biol. 23: 613-620.
Meijer, M. L., E. Jeppesen, E. van Donk, B. Moss, M. Scheffer, E. Lammens, E. van Nes, J. A. van Berkum, G. J. de Jong, B. A. Faafeng & J. P. Jensen, 1994. Long-term responses to fishstock reduction in small shallow lakes: interpretation of five-year results of four biomanipulation cases in The Netherlands and Denmark. Hydrobiologia 275/276: 457-466.
Meijer, M. L., M. W. de Haan, A. W. Breukelaar & H. Buiteveld, 1990. Is reduction of the benthivorous fish an important cause of light transparency following biomanipulation in shallow lakes? Hydrobiologia 200/201: 303-315.
Moss, B., 1990. Engineering and biological approaches to the restoration from eutrophication of shallow lakes in which aquatic plant communities are important components. Hydrobiologia 200/201: 367-77.
Moss, B., M. Beklioglu, L. Carvalho, S. Kilinc, S. McGowan & D. Stephen, 1997. Vertically challenged limnology; contrasts between deep and shallow lakes. Hydrobiologia 342/343: 257-267.
Moss, B. & R. T. Leah, 1982. Changes in the ecosystem of a guanotrophic and brackish shallow lake in eastern England; potential problems in its restoration. Int. Rev. ges Hydrobiol. 67: 625-639.
Moss, B., J. Madgwick & G. Phillips, 1996. A Guide to the Restoration of Nutrient Enriched Shallow Lakes. Broads Authority, Environment Agency and EU Life Programme, Norwich: 180 pp.
Muller-Solger, A., M. T. Brett, C. Luecke, J. J. Elser & C. R. Goldman, 1997. The effects of planktivorous fish (golden shiners) on the ciliate community of a mesotrophic lake. J. Plankton Res. 19: 1815-1828.
Northcote, T. G., 1988. Fish in the Structure and Function of Freshwater Ecosystems: A 'Top-down' view. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 45: 361-379.
Ozimek, T., R. D. Gulati & E. van Donk, 1990. Can macrophytes be useful in biomanipulation of lakes? The lake Zwemlust example. Hydrobiologia 200/201: 399-409.
Pennak, R. W., 1953. Freshwater Invertebrates of the United States. Ronald Press, New York: 769 pp.
Porter, K. G., 1973. Selective grazing and digestion of algae by zooplankton. Nature 244: 179-180.
Rigler, F. H., 1973. A dynamic view of the phosphorus cycle in lakes. In Giffith, E. J., A. Beeton, J. M. Spencer & D. T. Michell (eds), Environmental Phosphorus Handbook. Wiley & Sons, Toronto: 539-583.
Rosen, R. A., 1981. Length-dry weight relationships of some freshwater zooplankton. J. Freshwat. Ecol. 1: 225-229.
Scheffer, M., 1990. Multiplicity of stable states in freshwater systems. Hydrobiologia 200/201: 475-486.
Scheffer, M., S. H. Hosper, M. L. Meijer, B. Moss & E. Jeppesen, 1993. Alternative equilibria in shallow lakes. T.R.E.E. 8: 275- 279.
Schindler, D.W., 1977. Evolution of phosphorus limitation in lakes. Science 195: 260-262.
Schriver, P., J. Bogestrand, E. Jeppesen & M. Sondergaard, 1995. Impact of submerged macrophytes on fish-zooplankton- phytoplankton interactions: large scale enclosure experiments in a shallow eutrophic lake. Freshwat. Biol. 33: 255-270.
Scourfield, D. J. & J. P. Harding, 1966. A Key to the British Species of Freshwater Cladocera. 3rd edn. Freshwater Biological Association Scientific Publication no. 5. TitusWilson & Son ltd., Kendal: 61 pp.
Shapiro, J. H., V. Lamarra & M. Lynch, 1975. Biomanipulation; an ecosystem approach to lake restoration. In: Water Quality Management through Biological Control. Symposium proceedings, University Florida: 85-96.
Shapiro, J. H. & D. I. Wright, 1984. Lake restoration by manipulation: Round Lake, Minnesota, the first two years. Freshwat. Biol. 14: 371-383.
Smith, V. H., 1983. Low nitrogen - phosphorus ratios favour dominance by blue-green algae in lake phytoplankton. Science 221: 669-671.
Stephen, D., 1997. The role of macrophytes in shallow lake ecosystems: whole-lake, mesocosm and laboratory approaches. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Liverpool.
Stephen, D., B. Moss & G. Phillips, 1998. The relative importance of top-down and bottom-up control in a shallow macrophytedominated lake. Freshwat. Biol. 39: 699-713.
Talling, J. F. & D. Driver, 1961. Some problems in the estimation of chlorophyll a in phytoplankton. In Doty, M. S. (ed.), Proc. Conf. Primary Production Measurement, Marine and Freshwater. Univ. Hawaii, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Publ. TID 7633.
Timms, R. M. & B. Moss, 1984. Prevention of growth of potentially dense phytoplankton populations by zooplankton grazing, in the presence of zooplanktivorous fish, in a shallow wetland ecosystem. Limnol. Oceanogr. 29: 472-486.
van Donk, E., R. D. Gulati & M. P. Grimm, 1989. Food web manipulation in Lake Zwemlust: positive and negative effects during the first two years. Hydrobiol. Bull. 23: 19-34.
Vanni, M. J. & D. L. Findlay, 1990. Trophic cascades and phytoplankton community structure. Ecology 71: 921-937.
Vanni, M. J., 1987. Effects of nutrients and zooplankton size on the structure of a phytoplankton community. Ecology 68: 624-635.
Varley, M. E., 1989. British freshwater fishes: factors affecting their distribution. Fishing News Books Ltd.: 148 pp.
Williams, A. E., 1999. Effects of coarse fish in shallow lake ecosystems: an ecological and sociological appraisal. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Liverpool.
Winfield, I. J., G. Peirson, M. Cryer & C. R. Townsend, 1983. The behavioural basis of prey selection by underyearling bream (Abramis brama (L.)) and roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)). Freshwat. Biol. 13: 139-149.
Winkler, H. & C. P. Orellana, 1992. Functional response of five cyprinid species to planktonic prey. Envir. Biol. Fishes 33: 53-62.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Williams, A.E., Moss, B. Effects of different fish species and biomass on plankton interactions in a shallow lake. Hydrobiologia 491, 331–346 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024456803994
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024456803994