Skip to main content
Log in

Masculinity and Emotionality: An Investigation of Men's Primary and Secondary Emotional Responding

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the role of masculinity in men's affect intensity and men's fear of emotions. Men's masculine ideology and self-reported masculine gender role stress were assessed as cognitive and experiential factors of adherence to traditional masculine gender norms. Masculine ideology was negatively related to men's global affect intensity. However, on a 3-factor model of affect intensity, only negative reactivity was significantly related to masculine ideology. Both masculine ideology and masculine gender role stress were positively related to men's fear of emotions. Results are discussed in the context of theories of gender differences in emotion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 893-897.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, C. Z., Shapiro, N., Chambless, D. L., & Ahrens, A. H. (1998). Are emotions frightening? II: An analogue study of fear of emotion, interpersonal conflict, and panic onset. Behavior and Research Therapy, 36, 3-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannon, R., & Juni, S. (1984). A scale for measuring attitudes toward masculinity. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 14, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, L. R. (1985). Gender differences in emotional development: A review of theories and research. Journal of Personality, 53, 102-149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, L. R. (1997). Gender and emotion: Beyond stereotypes. Journal of Social Issues, 53, 369-393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, F. B., Yarnold, P. R., & Grimm, L. G. (1996). Toward a measurement model of the affect intensity measure: A three-factor structure. Journal of Research in Personality, 50, 223-247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106, 676-713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambless, D. L., & Goldstein, A. J. (1981). Clinical treatment of agoraphobia. In M. Mavissakalian & D. H. Barlow (Eds.), Phobia: Psychological and pharmacological treatment (pp. 103-144). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C., & McConville, C. (1993). Affect intensity: Factor or artifact? Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 135-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, D. S., & Brannon, R. (1976). The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Larsen, R. J., Levine, S., & Emmons, R. A. (1985). Frequency and intensity: The underlying dimensions of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1253-1265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Sandvik, E., & Larsen, R. J. (1985). Age and sex effects for emotional intensity. Developmental Psychology, 2, 542-546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, A., Cumberland, A., & Spinrad, T. L. (1998). Parent socialization of emotion. Psychology Inquiry, 9, 241-273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisler, R., & Skidmore, J. (1987). Masculine gender role stress: Scale development and components factors in the appraisal of stressful situations. Behavior Modification, 11, 123-136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisler, R. M., Skidmore, J. R., & Ward, C.H. (1988). Masculine gender-role stress: Predictor of anger, anxiety and health-risk behaviors. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 133-141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, R., & Davidson, R. J. (1994). The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fivush, R. (1989). Exploring differences in the emotional content of mother–child conversations about the past. Sex Roles, 20, 675-691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flett, G. L., Boase, P., McAndrews, M. P., Pliner, P., & Blankstein, K. P. (1986). Affect intensity and the appraisal of emotion. Journal of Research in Personality, 20, 447-459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frijda, N. H. (1994). Emotions require cognitions, even if simple ones. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 192-196). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, D., & Thelen, M. (1988). Children's expected interpersonal consequences of communicating their affective state and reported likelihood of expression. Child Development, 59, 1314-1322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, F., Diener, E., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Gender differences in the negative affect and well-being: The case for emotional intensity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 427-434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, R. E., & Walters, H. (1989). A validity study of the Affect Intensity Measure. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 4, 133-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, L. S., & Safran, J. D. (1987). Emotion in psychotherapy: Affect, cognition, and the process of change. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., Gifford, E. V., Follette, V. M., & Strosahl, K. (1996). Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: A functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1152-1168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakupcak, M., Lisak, D., & Roemer, L. (2002). The role of masculine ideology and masculine gender role stress in men's perpetration of relationship violence. Journal of Men and Masculinity, 3, 97-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kardum, I. (1999). Affect intensity and frequency: Their relation to mean level and variability of positive and negative affect and Eysenck's personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 33-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kring, A. M., & Gordon, A. H. (1998). Sex differences in emotion: Expression, experience, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 686-703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuebli, J., & Fivush, R. (1992). Gender differences in parent–child conversations about past emotions. Sex Roles, 27, 683-698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, R. J. (1984). Theory and measurement of affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 07B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, R. J., & Diener, E. (1985). A multitrait-multimethod examination of affect structure: Hedonic level and emotional intensity. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 631-646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, R. J., & Diener, E. (1987). Affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic: A review. Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 1-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, R.J., Diener, E., & Emmons, R.A. (1986). Affect intensity and reactions to daily life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 803-814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lash, S. J., Eisler, R. M., & Schulman, R. S. (1990). Cardiovascular reactivity to stress in men. Behavior Modification, 14, 3-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. (1994). Appraisal: The long and the short of it. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 208-215). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levant, R. F., Hirsch, L., Celentano, E., Cozza, T., Hill, S., MacEachern, M., et al. (1992). The male role: An investigation of contemporary norms. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 14, 325-337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manstead, A. S. (1992). Gender differences in emotion. In A. Gale & M. Eysenck (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences: Biological perspectives (pp. 355-387). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConatha, J. T., Lightner, E., & Deaner, S. (1994). Culture, age, and gender as variables in the expression of emotions. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 481-488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. (1995). The gender role strain paradigm: An update. In R. Levant & W. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 11-32). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salters, K., Jakupcak, M., & Roemer, L. (2000, November). Reactions to emotions: Gender differences in the Affect Control Scale. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy, New Orleans, LA.

  • Saurer, M. K., & Eisler, R. M. (1990). The role of masculine gender role stress in expressivity and social support network factors. Sex Roles, 23, 261-271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonsson-Sarnecki, M., Lundh, L., & Torestad, B. (2000). Factor structure and validity of the Affect Intensity Measure in a Swedish sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 337-350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. H., Jr. (1991). The maleness of violence in dating relationships: An appraisal of stereotypes. Sex Roles, 24, 261-278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. H., & Pleck, J. H. (1986). The structure of male role norms. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 531-543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. H., & Pleck, J. H. (1995). Masculinity ideologies: A review of research instrumentation on men and masculinities. In R. Levant & W. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 130-163). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. H., Pleck, J. H., & Ferrera, D. (1992). Men and masculinities: Scales for masculinity ideology and masculinity-related constructs. Sex Roles, 27, 573-607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmers, M., Fischer, A. H., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1998). Emotion expression as a function of gender and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 974-985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinfurt, K. P., Bryant, F. B., & Yarnold, P. R. (1994). The factor structure of the Affect Intensity Measure: In search of a measurement model. Journal of Research in Personality, 28, 314-331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. G. (1989). Neuroticism and extraversion in different factors of the Affect Intensity Measure. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 1095-1100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. E., Chambless, D. L., & Aherns, A. (1997). Are emotions frightening? An extension of the fear of fear construct. Behavior and Research Therapy, 35, 239-248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeman, J., & Garber, J. (1996). Display rules for anger, sadness, and pain: It depends on who is watching. Child Development, 67, 957-973.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew Jakupcak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jakupcak, M., Salters, K., Gratz, K.L. et al. Masculinity and Emotionality: An Investigation of Men's Primary and Secondary Emotional Responding. Sex Roles 49, 111–120 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024452728902

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024452728902

Navigation