Skip to main content
Log in

An Intertemporal CAPM Approach to Evaluate Mutual Fund Performance

  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Merton (1973) and Campbell (1993) have demonstrated that if an investor anticipates information shifts, he will adjust his portfolio choice today in an attempt to hedge these shifts. Exploiting these insights, we construct a new performance measure to evaluate fund managers' hedging ability. This new measure is different from two widely adopted performance evaluation measures: securities selectivity and market timing. Moreover, an econometric methodology is developed to simultaneously estimate the magnitudes of these three portfolio performance evaluation measures. The results show that mutual fund managers are on average with positive security selection and negative market timing ability. Furthermore, the mutual funds with investment style classified as “Asset Allocation” generally have positive hedging timing ability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Admati, A. R., S. Bhattacharya and P. Pfleiderer, “On Timing and Selectivity. ” Journal of Finance 41, 715–730 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, S. and P. Pfleiderer, “A Note on Performance Evaluation. ” Technical Report 714. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University, Graduate School of Business, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev, T. and J. M. Wooldridge, “Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference in Dynamic Models with Time-Varying Covariances. ” Econometrics Reviews 11, 143–172 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. J., W. N. Goetzmann, R. G. Ibbotson and S. A. Ross, “Survivorship Bias in Performance Studies. ” Review of Financial Studies 5, 553–580 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, John Y., “A Variance Decomposition for Stock Returns. ” Economic Journal 101, 157–179 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, John Y., “Intertemporal Asset Pricing Without Consumption Data. ” American Economic Review 83, 487–512 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, John Y., “Understanding Risk and Return. ” Journal of Political Economy 104, 298–345 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, E. C. and W. G. Lewellen, “Market Timing and Mutual Fund Investment Performance. ” Journal of Business 57, 57–72 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, G. and R. Korajczyk, “Performance Measure with the Arbitrage Pricing Theory. ” Journal of Financial Economics 15, 373–394 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dybvig, P. and S. A. Ross, “Differential Information and Performance Measurement Using a Security Market Line. ” Journal of Finance 40, 383–399 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Larry G. and S. E. Zin, “Substitution, Risk Aversion, and the Temporal Behavior of Consumption and Asset Returns: An Empirical Analysis. ” Journal of Political Economy 99, 263–286 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., “Components of Investment Performance. ” Journal of Finance 27, 551–567 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. and G. W. Schwert, “Asset Returns and Inflation. ” Journal of Financial Economic 5, 115–146 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferson, W., “Changes in Expected Security Returns, Risk, and the Level of Interest Rates. ” Journal of Finance 44, 1191–1217 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferson, W. and C. R. Harvey, “Variation of Economic Risk Premiums. ” Journal of Political Economy 99, 385–415 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferson, W. and R. Schadt, “Measuring Fund Strategy and Performance in Changing Economic Conditions. ” Journal of Finance 51, 425–462 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, D. J., J. Patel and R. Zeckhauser, “The J-Shape of Performance Persistance Given Survivorship Bias. ” The Review of Economics and Statistics 79, 161–166 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriksson, R. D., “Market Timing and Mutual Fund Performance: An Empirical Investigation. ” Journal of Business 57, 73–96 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriksson, R. D. and R. C. Merton, “On Market Timing and Investment Performance II: Statistical Procedures for Evaluation Forecasting Skills. ” Journal of Business 54, 513–533 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagannathan, R. and R. A. Korajczyk, “Assessing the Market Timing Performance of Managed Portfolios. ” Journal of Business 59, 217–236 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. “Optimal Utilization of Market Forecasts and the Evaluation of Investment Performance. ” In G. P. Szego and K. Shell (Eds.), Mathematical Methods in Investment and Finance, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. F. and S. Rahman, “MarketTiming, Selectivity, and Mutual Fund Performance:AnEmpirical Investigation. ” Journal of Business 63, 261–278 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, B. N. and D. M. Modest, “Mutual Fund Performance Evaluation: A Comparison of Benchmarks and Benchmark Comparisons. ” Journal of Finance 42, 233–265 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert C., “An Intertemporal Capital Asset Pricing Model. ” Econometrica 41, 867–887 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W. F., “Asset Allocation: Management Style and Performance Measurement. ” Journal of Portfolio Management 18, 7–19 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Treynor, J. L. and K. K. Mazuy, “Can Mutual Funds Outguess the Market?” Harvard Business Review 44, 131–136 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheng-few Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, Jr., Hung, Mw. & Lee, Cf. An Intertemporal CAPM Approach to Evaluate Mutual Fund Performance. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 20, 415–433 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024076518110

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024076518110

Navigation