Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Seasonal succession in fishless ponds: effects of enrichment and invertebrate predators on zooplankton community structure

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Size-selective predation by fish is often considered to be a primary driver of seasonal declines in large-bodied Daphnia populations. However, large Daphnia commonly exhibit midsummer extinctions in ponds lacking planktivorous fish. A number of empirical and theoretical studies suggest that resource competition and its interaction with nutrient enrichment may determine variable dominance by large Daphnia. Low resource levels may favor competitive dominance by small-bodied taxa while large Daphnia may be favored under high resource conditions or following a nutrient/productivity pulse. Nutrient enrichment may also influence the strength of invertebrate predation on Daphnia by affecting how long vulnerable juveniles are exposed to predation. We investigated these hypotheses using an in situ mesocosm experiment in a permanent fishless pond that exhibited seasonal losses of Daphnia pulex. To explore the effects of nutrient enrichment, Daphnia plus a diverse assemblage of small-bodied zooplankton were exposed to three levels of enrichment (low, medium, and high). To explore the interaction between nutrient enrichment and invertebrate predation, we crossed the presence/absence of Notonecta undulata with low and high nutrient manipulations. We found no evidence of competitive reversals or shifts in dominance among nutrient levels, Daphnia performed poorly regardless of enrichment. This may have been due to shifts in algal composition to dominance by large filamentous green algae. Notonecta had significant negative effects on Daphnia alone, but no interaction with nutrient enrichment was detected. These results suggest that Daphnia are not invariably superior resource competitors compared to small taxa. Though predators can have negative effects, their presence is not necessary to explain poor Daphnia performance. Rather, abiotic conditions and/or resource-based effects are probably of greater importance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arner, M., S. Koivisto, J. Norberg, & N. Kautsky, 1998. Trophic interactions in rockpool food webs: regulation of zooplankton and phytoplankton by Notonecta and Daphnia. Freshwat. Biol. 39: 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auchenbach, L. & W. Lampert, 1997. Effects of elevated temperatures on threshold food concentrations and possible competitive abilities of differently sized cladoceran species. Oikos 79: 469–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, J., 1987. Competitive dominance among Cladocera: are single-factor explanations enough? An examination of the experimental evidence. Hydrobiologia 145: 245–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, K. G. & J. J. Gilbert, 1987. Quantitative comparison of food niches in some freshwater zooplankton: a multi-tracer-cell approach. Oecologia 72: 331–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohannan, B. J. M. & R. E. Lenski, 1999. Effect of prey heterogeneity on the response of a model food chain to resourceenrichment. Am. Nat. 153: 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, J. L. & S. I. Dodson, 1965. Predation, body size, and composition of plankton. Science 150: 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, J. M., 1999. Food web effects of prey size refugia: Variable interactions and alternative stable equilibria. Am. Nat. 154: 559–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMott, W. R., 1989. The role of competition in zooplankton succession. In Sommer, U. (ed.), Plankton Ecology: Succession in Plankton Communities. Springer-Verlag, New York: 195–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, S. I., 1970. Complementary feeding niches sustained by size-selective predation. Limnol. Oceanogr. 15: 131–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliwicz, Z. M. & W. Lampert, 1990. Food thresholds in Daphnia species in the absence and presence of blue-green filaments. Ecology 71: 691–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliwicz, Z. M. & J. Pijanowska, 1989. The role of predation in zooplankton succession. In Sommer, U. (ed.), Plankton Ecology: Succession in Plankton Communities. Springer-Verlag, New York: 253–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliwicz, Z. M. & E. Seidlar, 1980. Food size limitation and algae interfering with food collection in Daphnia. Arch. Hydrobiol. 88: 155–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulden, C. E., L. L. Hornig & C. Wilson, 1978. Why do large zooplankton species dominate? Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol. Verh. 20: 2457–2460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulden, C. E., L. L. Henry & A. J. Tessier, 1982. Body size, energy reserves, and competitive ability in three species of cladocera. Ecology 63: 1780–1789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. J., W. E. Cooper & E. E. Werner, 1970. An experimental approach to the production dynamics and structure of freshwater animal communities. Limnol. Oceanogr. 15: 839–928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, F. P. & L. L. Hendzel, 1976. Physiological indicators of nutrient deficiency in lake phytoplankton. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 37: 442–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrbacek, J., M. Dvorakova, V. Korinek & L. Prochazkova, 1961. Demonstration of the effect of the fish stock on the species composition of zooplankton and the intensity of metabolism of the whole plankton association. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol. Verh. 14: 192–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerfoot, W. C., C. Levitan & W. R. DeMott, 1988. Daphniaphytoplankton interactions: density-dependent shifts in resource quality. Ecology 69: 1806–1825.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knisely, K. & W. Geller, 1986. Selective feeding of four zooplankton species in natural lake phytoplankton. Oecologia 69: 86–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M., 1978. Complex interactions between natural coexploiters–Daphnia and Ceriodaphnia. Ecology 59: 552–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M., 1979. Predation, competition, and zooplankton community structure: an experimental study. Limnol. Oceanogr. 24: 253–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, E. & F. Briand, 1979. Zooplankton grazing and phytoplankton species richness: field tests of the predation hypothesis. Limnol. Oceanogr. 24: 243–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, E., 1984. The estimation of the abundances and biomass of zooplankton in samples. In Downing, J. A. & F. Rigler (eds), A Manual on the Methods for the Assessment of Secondary Productivity in Freshwaters. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford: 228–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, E., W. W. Murdoch & S. Watson, 1988. Simple models and variation in plankton densities among lakes. Am. Nat. 132: 383–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelbach, G. G., A. M. Turner, D. J. Hall, J. E. Rettig & C. W. Osenberg, 1995. Perturbation and resilience: a long-term, wholelake study of predator extinction and reintroduction. Ecology 76: 2347–2360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. & C. Folt, 1993. Zooplankton body size and community structure: effects of thermal and toxicant stress. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 178–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, P. J., 1987. Salamander predation, prey facilitation, and seasonal succession in microcrustacean communities. In Kerfoot, W. C. & A. Sih (eds), Predation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities. University Press of New England, Hanover: 174–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, W. W., M. A. Scott & P. Ebsworth, 1984. Effects of the general predator Notonecta (Hemiptera) upon a freshwater community. J. anim. Ecol. 53: 791–808.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill, W. E., 1975a. Experimental studies of microcrustacean competition, community composition, and efficiency of resource utilization. Ecology 56: 809–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill, W. E., 1975b. Resource partitioning by competing microcrustaceans in stable laboratory microecosystems. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol. Verh. 19: 2885–2890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, M. L., K. G. Porter & Y. S. Feig, 1983. Species-and agespecific differences in bacterial resource utilization by two cooccurring cladocerans. Ecology 64: 1145–1156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastorak, R. A., 1981. Prey vulnerability and size selection by Chaoborus larvae. Ecology 62: 1311–1324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. S., 1984. The Ecology of Freshwater Phytoplankton. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richman, S. & S. I. Dodson, 1983. The effect of food quality on feeding and respiration by Daphnia and Diaptomus. Limnol. Oceanogr. 28: 948–956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanovsky, Y. E. & I. Y. Feniova, 1985. Competition among Cladocera: effect of different levels of food supply. Oikos 44: 243–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. A. & W. M. Murdoch, 1983. Selective predation by the backswimmer, Notonecta. Limnol. Oceanogr. 28: 352–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, U., M. Gliwicz, W. Lampert & A. Duncan, 1986. The PEG-model of seasonal succession of planktonic events in fresh waters. Arch. Hydrobiol. 106: 433–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitze, K., 1985. Functional response of an ambush predator: Chaoborus americanus predation on Daphnia pulex. Ecology 66: 938–949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, C. F., 2001. Seasonal succession and variable Daphnia dominance in fishless ponds: ecological determinants and ecosystem consequences. Doctoral Dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, C. F., 2002. Context-dependent effects of Daphnia pulex on pond ecosystem function: observational and experimental evidence. Oecologia 131: 549–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterner, R. W. & D. O. Hessen, 1994. Algal nutrient limitation and the nutrition of aquatic herbivores. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25: 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift, M. C. & A. Y. Fedorenko, 1975. Some aspects of prey capture by Chaoborus larvae. Limnol. Oceanogr. 20: 418–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tessier, A. J. & C. E. Goulden, 1987. Cladoceran juvenile growth. Limnol. Oceanogr. 32: 680–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tessier, A. J. & J. Welser, 1991. Cladoceran assemblages, seasonal succession and the importance of a hypolimnetic refuge. Freshwat. Biol. 25: 85–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillmann, U. & W. Lampert, 1984. Competitive ability of differently sized Daphnia species: an experimental test. J. Freshwat. Ecol. 2: 311–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanni, M. J., 1987. Effects of nutrients and zooplankton size on the structure of a phytoplankton community. Ecology 68: 624–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinyard, G. L. & R. A. Menger, 1980. Chaoborus americanus predation on various zooplankters: functional response and behavioral observations. Oecologia 45: 90–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Ende, C. N., 1993. Repeated-measures analysis: growth and other time-dependent measures. In Scheiner, S. M. & J. Gurevitch (eds), Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments. Chapman and Hall, New York: 113–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welschmeyer, N. A., 1994. Fluorometric analysis of chlorophyll a in the presence of chlorophyll b and phaeopigments. Limnol. Oceanogr. 39: 1985–1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Christopher F. Steiner

    Present address: Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources, Cook College, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, U.S.A.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. W. K. Kellogg Biological Station and the Department of Zoology, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI, 49060, U.S.A.

    Christopher F. Steiner

  2. Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources, Cook College, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, U.S.A.

    Allison H. Roy

Authors
  1. Christopher F. Steiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Allison H. Roy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steiner, C.F., Roy, A.H. Seasonal succession in fishless ponds: effects of enrichment and invertebrate predators on zooplankton community structure. Hydrobiologia 490, 125–134 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023470730397

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023470730397

Search

Navigation