Abstract
The main objective of our work is to explore the feasibility of designing an airborne RADAR system much like the University of Texas Institute for Geophysics airborne ice-penetrating radar systems for use in the detection of underground structures. Here we summarize our initial efforts toward achieving this goal. The studies conducted so far include two major tasks: (1) development of hybrid numerical-analytical techniques for simulating the radar response of underground targets, and (2) a ground penetrating radar field experiment conducted at a known site that has underground tunnels. In our numerical simulation, we used analytic solutions to propagate the EM wave field from an airplane to the ground surface and then used a finite difference scheme to compute the response of complex geology including some underground structure. During the field investigation, we collected several surface GPR profiles with varying source-receiving antenna separations and configurations. The data were processed using algorithms similar to those used in seismic data processing. Despite the high moisture content in the field area during data collection, we were able to identify features in the data that can be modeled as diffractions from underground targets. The results are encouraging. Our future work will include revisiting the site during the summer months since we expect to be able to image the underground facilities better when the ground is dry. Based on the success of the ground based GPR field surveys, we will investigate the possibilities of designing and testing an airborne system.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Annan, A.P. and Davis, J.L., 1976, Impulse radar soundings in permafrost: Radio Science, v. 11, p. 383-394.
Blankenship, D.D., Bell, R.E., Hodge, S.M., Brozena, J.M., Behrendt, J.C., and Finn, C.A., 1993, Active volcanism beneath the West Antarctic ice sheet and implications for ice-sheet stability: Nature, v. 361, no. 11, p. 526-529.
Cai, J. and McMechan, G.A., 1995, Ray-based synthesis of bistatic ground-penetrating radar profiles: Geophysics, v. 60, no. 1, p. 87-96.
Carcione, J.M., 1995, Ground-penetrating radar: Wave theory and numerical simulations in lossy anisotropic media: Geophysics, v. 61, no. 6, p. 1664-1677.
Casper, D.A. and Kung, S.K., 1996, Simulation of ground-penetrating radar waves in a 2-D soil model: Geophysics, v. 61, no. 4, p. 1034-1049.
Davis, J.L. and Annan, A.P, 1989, Ground-penetrating radar for high resolution mapping of soil and rock stratigraphy: Geophysical Prospecting, v. 37, p. 531-551.
Forsythe, G.E. and Wasow, W.R., 1965, Finite-Difference Methods For Partial Differential Equations, John Wiley & Sons, 444 pp.
Maloney, J.G. and Smith, G.S., 1992, The efficient modeling of thin material sheets in the finite-difference time domain (FDTD) method: IEE Trans. Anten. Prop., AP-40, p. 323-330.
Marion, J.B., 1968, Classical Electromagnetic Radiation, Academic Press, 479 pp.
Roberts, R.L. and Daniels, J.J., 1997, Modeling of neat-field GPR in three dimensions using the FDTD method: Geophysics, v. 62, no. 4, p. 1114-1126.
Sen, M.K. and Frazer, L.N., 1985, Kirchhoff-Helmholtz reflection seismograms in a laterally variable multi-layered elastic medium, Part II, Computation: Geophysical J. Royal Astr. Soc., v. 82, p. 415-437.
Xu, T. and McMechan, G.A., 1997, GPR attenuation and its numerical simulation in 2.5 dimensions: Geophysics, v. 62, no. 1, p. 403-414.
Zeng, X. and McMechan, G.A., 1997, GPR characterization of buried tanks and pipes: Geo-physics, v. 62, no. 3, p. 797-806.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sen, M.K., Stoffa, P.L., Seifoullaev, R.K. et al. Numerical and Field Investigations of GPR: Toward an Airborne GPR. Subsurface Sensing Technologies and Applications 4, 41–60 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023011413969
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023011413969