Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Establishing royal paulownia on the Virginia Piedmont

  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study was established in the Virginia Piedmont to investigate theeffects of site preparation treatments (subsoiling and trenching) and the useofweed mats on royal paulownia survival and growth. Seedlings were monitored inthree study blocks for seven years. Following the seventh growing season,survival was low, ranging from 11% in the control plots to 27% in the trenchedplots. Plot volume index averaged 28,633 for the subsoil plots, while controlplots had an average plot volume index of 12,685. Weed mats significantlyincreased soil moisture from 18.7 to 20.4%. Likewise, weed mats significantlyimproved seedling survival after seven years, from 9% to 30%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bergmann B.A. 1998. Propagation method influences first year field survival and growth of Paulownia. New For. 16: 251–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremner J.M. and Mulvaney C.S. 1982. Nitrogen – total. In: Page A.L., Miller R.H. and Keeney D.R. (eds), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Agronomy Series No. 9. 2nd edn. Amer. Soc. of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp. 595–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming R.L., Black T.A. and Adams R.S. 1996. Site preparation effects on Douglas-fir and lodgepole pine water relations following planting in a pinegrass-dominated clearcut. For. Ecol. Manage. 83: 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves D.H. and Stringer J.W. 1989. Paulownia–a guide to establishment and cultivation. Univ. of Kentucky Coop. Extension Serv. FOR-39, Lexington, KY, 8 pp.

  • Haywood J.D. 1999. Durability of selected mulches, their ability to control weeds, and influence growth of loblolly pine seedlings. New For. 18: 263–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardie I., Kundt J. and Miyasaka E. 1989. Economic feasibility of U.S. paulownia plantations. J. For. 87: 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson J.E., Burger J.A., Rathfon R.A., Kreh R.E. and Feret P.P. 1991. Foliar nutrient comparisons of pitch pine, loblolly pine, and the pitch x loblolly hybrid. Plant and Soil 132: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson J.E., Pease J.W., Johnson L.A. and Hopper G.M. 1992. Tree crops for marginal farmland – royal paulownia, with a financial analysis. Virginia Cooperative Extension Pub. 446–606. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, 22pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kays J., Johnson D. and Stringer J.W. 1998. How to produce and market paulownia. Univ. of Maryland Coop. Ext. Serv. Bull. 319. College Park, MD, 22pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney D.R. 1982. Nitrogen-availability indices. In: Page A.L., Miller R.H. and Keeney D.R. (eds), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. 2nd edn. Amer. Soc. of Agronomy, Madison,WI Agronomy Series No. 9., pp. 722–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo S. 1996. Phosphorus. In: Sparks D.L. (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3. Soil Sci. Soc. of Amer., Madison, WI No. 5., pp. 869–919.

  • Langdon K.R. and Johnson K.D. 1994. Additional notes on invasiveness of Paulownia tomentosa in natural areas. Natural Areas J. 14: 139–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald P.M. and Helgerson O.T. 1990. Mulches aid in regenerating California and Oregon forests: Past, present, and future. USDA Forest Serv., Pacific SW Res. Sta., Gen. Tech. Rep, PSW-123.

  • Preston D.J. 1983. Paulownia-miracle tree or passing fancy? Amer. For. 89: 15–19, 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker R.F. and McLaughlin S.B. 1989. Black polyethylene mulch improves growth of plantation-grown loblolly pine and yellow-poplar. New For. 3: 265–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams C.E. 1993a. Age structure and importance of naturalized Paulownia tomentosa in a central Virginia streamside forest. Castanea 58: 243–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams C.E. 1993b. The exotic empress tree, Paulownia tomentosa: An invasive pest of forests? Natural Areas J. 13: 221–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin R. and He Q. 1997. The spatial and temporal effects of paulownia intercropping-the case of northern China. Agroforestry Systems 37: 91–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao-Hua Z., Ching-Ju C., Xin-Yu L. and Yao Gao X. 1997. Paulownia in China: Cultivation and utilization. Asian Network for Biol. Sci. and Intl. Development Res. Ctr., Ottawa, Canada, <http: // www.idrc.ca/library/document /0712351>.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Forestry (0324), College of Natural Resources, 324 Cheatham Hall, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, 24061, U.S

    James E. Johnson, David O. Mitchem & Richard E. Kreh

Authors
  1. James E. Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David O. Mitchem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Richard E. Kreh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, J.E., Mitchem, D.O. & Kreh, R.E. Establishing royal paulownia on the Virginia Piedmont. New Forests 25, 11–23 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022349231557

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022349231557

Search

Navigation