Skip to main content
Log in

Applicant Gender and Family Structure: Effects on Perceived Relocation Commitment and Spouse Resistance

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Within the context of a controlled laboratory study, the effects of applicant gender, marital type (single earner, dual earner), and parental status (child, no child) on perceptions of job applicant commitment to a move involving geographic relocation and expected family resistance to the move were investigated. The results indicated that gender and family structure variables interacted in their influence on the dependent variables. Participants also provided reasons for their ratings of perceived commitment. Content analysis revealed 4 themes underlying participant responses: family concerns, goals and motivation of applicant, experience of applicant, and individual differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Allen, T. D., & Rush, M. C. (1998). Examining the effects of organizational citizenship behavior on performance judgments: A field and laboratory study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 247-260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T. D., & Russell, J. E. A. (1999). Parental leave of absence: Some not so family friendly implications. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 166-191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T. D., Russell, J. E. A., & Rush, M. C. (1994). Effects of gender and leave of absence on attributions for high performance, perceived organizational commitment, and allocation of organizational rewards. Sex Roles, 31, 443-464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, J. M. (1982). Job transfer and well-being. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 450-463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, J. M. (1997). Family, sex, and career advancement. In S. Parasuraman & J. H. Greenhaus (Eds.), Integrating work and family: Challenges and choices for a changing world (pp. 143-153). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, J. M., Stroh, L. K., & Reilly, A. H. (1992). What is it like being a dual-career manager in the 1990s? In S. Zedeck (Ed.), Work, families, and organizations (pp. 138-167). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collie, H. C. (1989, September). Two salaries, one relocation: What's a company to do? Personnel Administrator, 34, 54-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, E. P. (1994). Role salience and multiple roles: A gender perspective. Career Development Quarterly, 43, 85-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C. L., & Makin, P. (1985). The mobile managerial family. Journal of Management Development, 4 56-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eby, L. T. (2001). The boundaryless career experiences of mobile spouses in dual-earner marriages. Group and Organization Management, 26, 343-368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eby, L. T., Allen, T. D., & Douthitt, S. S. (1999). The effects of non-performance factors on relocation opportunities: A field study and laboratory experiment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79, 29-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. C. (1988). Managing careers in organizations. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J., & Bailyn, L. (1996). Challenging the last boundary: Reconnecting work and family. In M. B. Arthur & D. M. Rousseau (Eds.), The boundaryless career: A new employment principle for a new organizational era (pp. 256-267). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, G. (1995). Relocation has a new look. Personnel Journal, 44 (2), 48-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaylord, M., & Symons, E. (1986). Relocation stress: A definition and a need for services. Employment Assistance Quarterly, 2 31-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, S., & Mitchell, T. (1979). Attributional process of leaders in leader-member interactions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 429-459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. T. (1989). Moving beyond the mommy track: An organization change approach. Personnel, 66(2), 23-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedge, J. W., & Kavanaugh, M. J. (1988). Improving the accuracy of performance evaluations: Comparisons of three methods of performance appraiser training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 68-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.

  • Judge, T. A., & Bretz, R. D. (1994). Political influence behavior and career success. Journal of Management, 20, 43-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171-194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mook, D. G. (1983). In defense of external invalidity. American Psychologist, 38, 379-387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munton, A. G., Forster, N., Altman, Y., & Greenbury, L. (1993). Job relocation: Managing people on the move. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Ross, J. (1982). The effects of marriage and a working wife on occupational and wage attainment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 66-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinder, C. C. (1989). The dark side of executive relocation. Organizational Dynamics, 17, 48-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H. (1993). Are family-supportive employer policies relevant to men? In J. Hood (Ed.), Men, work, and family (pp. 217-237). Newbury Park, CA: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. N. (1990). One more time: Dofemale and male managers differ? Academy of Management Executive, 4 68-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. N. (1993). Women and men in management (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricklin, H. (1991). Spouse career relocation assistance is becoming an important element of the corporate benefits package. Employee Benefits Journal, 16(1), 33-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, P. R., & Larson, J. R. (1990). Research strategies and tactics in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 419-489). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneer, J. A., & Reitman, F. (1993). Effects of alternative family structures on managerial career paths. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 830-843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, L. F., Barksdale, K., & Shore, T. H. (1995). Managerial perceptions of employee commitment to the organization. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1593-1615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroh, L. K., & Brett, J. M. (1996). The dual-earner dad penalty in salary progression. Human Resource Management, 35, 181-201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroh, J. M., Brett, J. M., & Reilly, A. H. (1992). All the right stuff: A comparison of female and male managers' career progression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 251-260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swiss, D. J., & Walker, J. P. (1993). Women and the work/family dilemma. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitely, W., Dougherty, T. W., & Dreher, G. F. (1991). The relationship of career and mentoring and socioeconomic origin to managers, and professionals, early career progress. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 331-351.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Allen, T.D., Eby, L.T., Douthitt, S.S. et al. Applicant Gender and Family Structure: Effects on Perceived Relocation Commitment and Spouse Resistance. Sex Roles 47, 543–552 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022073821684

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022073821684

Navigation