Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative Analysis of the Effects of Ultrasound from an Odor Sprayer on Moth Flight Behavior

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A piezoelectric sprayer was recently developed for precision release of odor stimuli in olfactory research. The device replaces conventional dispensers used to release semiochemicals in studies of moth flight toward odor sources. However, the device generates high-frequency sounds in the range that some moths can hear. Ultrasound from the standard set-up sprayer had a considerable impact on flight behavior of the silver Y moth, Autographa gamma, tested in a flight tunnel. It was affected at all behavioral stages when the dispenser was driven at 120 kHz. Only 5% of the moths reached the source when exposed to 120-kHz sound from the dispenser compared to 65% in the control group without sound. The proportion taking flight was also reduced. Hearing threshold curves obtained electrophysiologically revealed that moths were sensitive to the frequency range at which the sprayer was operated and that sound intensity from the sprayer was up to 40 dB above the moths' electrophysiological hearing threshold. The audiogram for A. gamma was similar to audiograms obtained for other noctuids. Hearing sensitivity was highest at around 15 kHz, where the threshold was 35 dB SPL (sound pressure level). The threshold increased with frequency up to 94 dB SPL at 160 kHz. We improved the sprayer to operate at 300 kHz, which is beyond the hearing ability of most insects with ears. At this high frequency, the moths' sensitivity to ultrasound is reduced considerably, and we did not observe any effect on flight behavior compared to a control group without sound. Accordingly, this new piezoelectric sprayer can be used with ultrasound-sensitive insects and insensitive insects alike.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • El-Sayed, A., GöddeJ., and Arn, H. 1999. Sprayer for quantitative application of odor stimuli. Environ. Entomol. 28:947-953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, R. R. 1992. The evolution of hearing in insects as an adaptation to predation from bats, pp. 115-119, in D. B. Webster, R. R. Fay, and A. N. Popper (Eds.). The Evolutionary Biology of Hearing. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, B., Cook, W. R., and Jaffe, H. 1989. Piezoelectric Ceramics. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • KinslerL. E., Frey, A. R., Coppens, A. B., and Sanders, J. V. 2000. Fundamentals of Acoustics, 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. A. and Surlykke, A. 2001. How some insects detect and avoid being eaten by bats: tactics and countertactics of prey and predator. Bioscience 51:570-581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeder, K. D. 1966. Acoustic sensitivity of the noctuid tympanic organ and its range for the cries of bats. J. Insect Physiol. 12:843-859.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeder, K. D. 1967. Nerve Cells and Insect Behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoble, M. J. 1992. The Lepidoptera: Form, Function and Diversity. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skals, N. and SurlykkeA. 2000. Hearing and evasive behavior in the greater wax moth, Galleria mellonella (Pyralidae). Physiol. Entomol. 25:354-362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surlykke, A., Filskov, M., Fullard, J. H., and Forrest, E. 1999. Auditory relationships to size in noctuid moths: Bigger is better. Naturwissenschaften 86:238-241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, T. 1981. Responses of nonflying moths to ultrasound: the threat of gleaning bats. Can. J. Zool. 59:525-529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, J. W., Löfstedt, C., and Bengtsson, B. O. 1996. Genetic variation in the strongly canalized sex pheromone communication system of the European corn borer. Genetics 144:757-766.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niels Skals.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skals, N., Plepys, D., El-Sayed, A.M. et al. Quantitative Analysis of the Effects of Ultrasound from an Odor Sprayer on Moth Flight Behavior. J Chem Ecol 29, 71–82 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021924529533

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021924529533

Navigation