Skip to main content
Log in

The Classroom as a Courtroom

  • Published:
Social Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using the metaphor of the classroom as a courtroom promotes insights regarding our school system. For example, in the courtroom, act severity and the presence or absence of a ‘guilty mind’ determine criminal sentencing. In a similar manner, in the classroom, the respective determinants of performance evaluation are exam score and the presence or absence of effort expenditure. In addition, the purposes of courtroom punishment (utilitarian and retributive) can also be observed in classroom settings and pupil impression management strategies concerning why they performed poorly can be viewed as attempts to communicate mitigating circumstances so that their punishment is lessened. Some additional consequences of this ill-fated metaphor are also examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Batson, C.D., Bowers, M.J., Leonard, E.A., & Smith, E.C. (2000). Does personal morality exacerbate or restrain retaliation after being harmed? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 35-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covington, M. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsworth, P. & Gross, S. (1994). Hardening of the attitudes: American's view of the death penalty. Journal of Social Issues, 50,19-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farwell, L. & Weiner, B. (1996). Self-perception of fairness in individual and group contexts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 867-881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N.T. (1999). Values, achievement, and justice: Studies in the psychology of deservingness. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, J. (1970). Doing and deserving: Essays in the theory of responsibility. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D. & Grudin, J. (1985). The evolution of mental metaphors in psychology: A 90-years retrospective. American Psychologist, 40, 181-192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gert, B. (1988). Morality: A new justification of the moral rules. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth, J. (1971). Sentencing as a human process. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juvonen, J. & Murdock, T.B. (1993). How to promote social approval: Effects of audience and outcome on publicly communicated attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 365-376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juvonen, J. & Murdock, T.B. (1995). Grade-level differences in the social value of effort: Implications for self-presentation tactics in early adolescents. Child Development, 66, 1694-1705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leary, D.E. (Ed.). (1990). Metaphors in the history of psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. & Lovegrove, M.N. (1987). What students think of teachers' classroom control techniques: Results from four studies. In N. Hastings & J. Schwieso (Eds.), New directions in educational psychology: 2. Behavior and motivation in the classroom (pp. 93-113). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFatter, R. (1978). Sentencing strategies and justice: Effects of punishment philosophy on sentencing decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1490-1500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. (1987). The moral worth of retribution. In F. Schoeman (Ed.), Responsibility, character, and the emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press; pp. 179-219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J.C. & Coleman, J.L. (1990). Philosophy of law: An introduction to jurisprudence. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1955). Concepts of rules. Philosophical Review, 64, 4-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyna, C.E. & Weiner, B. (2001). Justice and utility in the classroom: An attributional analysis of the goals of teachers' punishment and intervention strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 309-319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidmar, N. & Miller, D. (1980). Social psychological processes underlying attitudes toward legal punishment. Law Psychological Review, 14, 565-602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphors, theories, and research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1995). Judgements of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. & Kukla, A. (1970). An attributional examination of achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 1-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B., Graham, S., & Reyna, C.E. (1997). An attributional examination of retributive versus utilitarian philosophies of punishment. Social Justice Research, 10, 431-452.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weiner, B. The Classroom as a Courtroom. Social Psychology of Education 6, 3–15 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021736217048

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021736217048

Keywords

Navigation