Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Marital Satisfaction and an Information-Processing Measure of Partner-Schemas

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In comparison with most research on relationship cognitions that has focused on cognitive contents as assessed by self-report measures, this study introduces an information-processing measure of partner-schemas, based on the incidental recall task. Indices from this task include judgments as to whether negative and positive personal adjectives describe the partner (i.e., a measure of schema content) and incidental recall of adjectives initially endorsed as describing the partner (i.e., a measure of facilitated recall of schema-relevant information). Results from a sample of married couples indicated that the newly introduced measure of partner—schemas was correlated with marital satisfaction, and that these correlations remained significant when controlling for symptoms of depression. These findings suggest that the incidental recall task may be a useful measure of partner-schemas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, N. (1968). Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 272–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. M., & Glassman, N. S. (1996). Responding to significant others when they are not there: Effects on interpersonal inference, motivation, and affect. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 262–321). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, M. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 461–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, M. W., Fehr, B., Keedian, E., Seidel, M., & Thompson, D. W. (1993). An exploration of the relational schemata underlying attachment styles: Self-report and lexical decision approaches. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 746–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, M. W., Keelan, J. P. R., Fehr, B., Enns,V., & Koh-Rangarajoo, E. (1996). Social–cognitive conceptualizations of attachment working models:Availability and accessibility effects. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 71, 94–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baucom, D. H., & Epstein, N. (1990). Cognitive–behavioral marital therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baucom,D. H., Epstein, N., Rankin, L. A., & Burnett, C. K. (1996). Assessing relationship standards: The inventory of specific relationship standards. Journal of Family Psychology, 10, 72–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baucom,D. H., Epstein, N., Sayers, S., & Sher, T. G. (1989). The role of cognitions in marital relationships: Definitional, methodological, and conceptual issues. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory-II manual. Psychological Corporation.

  • Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1987). Affect and cognition in close relationships:Towards an integrative model. Cognition and Emotion, 1, 59–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Attributions in marriage: Review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 3–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. I., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depths of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derry, P., & Kuiper, N. (1981). Schematic processing and self-reference in clinical depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 90, 286–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eidelson, R. J., & Epstein, N. (1982). Cognition and relationship maladjustment: Development of a measure of dysfunctional relationship beliefs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 515–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F. D., Beach, S. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1989). Marital distress, depression, and attributions: Is the marital distress-attribution association an artifact of depression? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 768–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F. D., & Bradbury, T. N. (1993). Marital satisfaction, depression, and attributions:Alongitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 442–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F. D., Garnier, P. C., Gano-Phillips, S., & Osborne, L. N. (1995). Preinteraction expectations, marital satisfaction, and accessibility:Anew look at sentiment override. Journal ofFamily Psychology, 9, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F. D., & Osborne, L. N. (1995). Understanding marriage and marital distress: Do milliseconds matter? Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, G. J. O., Rosanowski, J., & Fitness, J. (1994). Automatic processing in intimate contexts: The role of close-relationship beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 888–897.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, G. J. O., & Thomas, G. (1996). Close relationship lay theories: Their structure and function. In G. J.O. Fletcher & J. Fitness (Eds.), Knowledge structures in close relationships:Asocial psychological approach (pp. 3–24). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, M. S., & Beck, A. T. (1989). Depression versus anxiety: A test of the content-specificity hypothesis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98, 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyman, R. E., Sayers, S. L., & Bellack, A. S. (1994). Global marital satisfaction versus marital adjustment: An empirical comparison of three measures. Journal of Family Psychology, 8, 432–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horneffer, K. J., & Fincham, F. D. (1996). Attributional models of depression and marital distress. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 678–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, R. E., Kendall, P. C., Smith, T. W., Donnell, C., & Ronan, K. (1987). Cognitive specificity in emotional distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 734–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuiper, N. A., & Derry, P. (1982). Depressed and nondepressed content self reference in mild depressives. Journal of Personality, 50, 67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, H. (1977). Self-schemas and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 79–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980).Humaninference: Strategies and shortcoming of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R., & Wilson, T. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, R. (1983). Measuring marital quality:Acritical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, T. B., Kuiper, N. A., & Kirker,W. S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 677–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillars, A. L., Weisberg, J., Burggraf, C. S., & Zietlow, P. H. (1990). Communication and understanding revisited: Married couples' understanding and recall of conversations. Communication Research, 17, 500–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanzetti, N. A., Notarius, C. I., & NeeSmith, D. (1992). Specific and generalized expectancies in marital interaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 6, 171–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R. L. (1980). Strategic behavioral marital therapy: Toward a model for assessment and intervention. In J. P. Vincent (Ed.), Advances in family intervention, assessment and theory (Vol. 1, pp. 229–271). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whisman, M. A. (2001). The association between depression and marital dissatisfaction. In S. R. H. Beach (Ed.), Marital and family processes in depression:Ascientific foundation for clinical practice (pp. 3–24). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeno, S., Ivens, S., Millard, R., & Duvvuri, R. (Eds.). (1995). The educator's word frequency guide. New York: Touchstone Applied Science Associates.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut

    Mark A. Whisman & Sherrie S. Delinsky

Authors
  1. Mark A. Whisman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sherrie S. Delinsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whisman, M.A., Delinsky, S.S. Marital Satisfaction and an Information-Processing Measure of Partner-Schemas. Cognitive Therapy and Research 26, 617–627 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020305226067

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020305226067

Search

Navigation