Skip to main content
Log in

Income Distribution Dynamics with Endogenous Fertility

  • Published:
Journal of Economic Growth Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Developing countries with highly unequal income distributions, such as Brazil or South Africa, face an uphill battle in reducing inequality. Educated workers in these countries have a much lower birthrate than uneducated workers. Assuming children of educated workers are more likely to become educated, this fertility differential increases the proportion of unskilled workers, reducing their wages, and thus their opportunity cost of having children, creating a vicious cycle. A model incorporating this effect generates multiple steady-state levels of inequality, suggesting that in some circumstances, temporarily increasing access to educational opportunities could permanently reduce inequality. Empirical evidence suggests that the fertility differential between the educated and uneducated is greater in less equal countries, consistent with the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barro, R., and X. Sala-i-Martin. (1995). Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birdsall, N. (1988). “Economic Approaches to Population Growth,” in Chenery, H., and Srinivasan, T.N., eds., Handbook of Development Economics, vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, pp. 477–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, D. L. (1999). “Income Distribution Dynamics with Endogenous Fertility,” Senior Thesis, Harvard University.

  • Chu, C. Y. C., and H.-W. Koo. (1990). “Intergenerational Income-Group Mobility and Differential Fertility,” American Economic Review 80(5), 1125–1138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahan, M., and D. Tsiddon. (1998). “Demographic Transition, Income Distribution, and Economic Growth,” Journal of Economic Growth 3(1), 29–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K., and L. Squire. (1996). “Measuring Income Inequality: A New Data-base.” Development Discussion Paper No. 537, Harvard Institute for International Development, Harvard University.

  • Galor, O., and J. Zeira. (1993). “Income Distribution and Macroeconomics,” Review of Economic Studies 60(1), 35–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galor, O., and H. Zang. (1997). “Fertility, Income Distribution, and Economic Growth: Theory and Cross-Country Evidence,” Japan and the World Economy 9(2), 197–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. (1982). Socio-economic Differentials in Achieved Fertility. World Fertility Survey Comparative Study No. 21, ECE Analyses. Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremer, M., and D. Chen. (2000). “Income Distribution Dynamics with Endogenous Fertility,” NBER Working Paper No. 7530.

  • Krusell, P., L. Ohanian, V. Rios-Rull, and G. Violante. (1997). Capital-Skill Complementarity and Inequality: A Macroeconomic Analysis. Federal Reserve Bank of Minnesota Staff Report #239.

  • Lam, D. (1986). “The Dynamics of Population Growth, Differential Fertility, and Inequality,” American Economic Review 76(5), 1103–1116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mare, R. D. (1997). “Differential Fertility, Intergenerational Educational Mobility, and Racial Inequality,” Social Science Research 26(3), 263–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mboup, G., and T. Saha. (1998). Fertility Levels, Trends, and Differentials: Demographic and Health Surveys, Comparative Study No. 28. Calverton, Maryland: Macro International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moav, O. (2001). “Cheap Children and the Persistence of Poverty.” Mimeo.

  • Morand, O. (1999). “Endogenous Fertility, Income Distribution, and Growth,” Journal of Economic Growth 4(3), 331–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei cheng pu. (1996). Chung-hua min kuo Tai Min ti chu jen kou tung chi. Taiwan-Fukien demographic fact book, Republic of China, Tai-pei.

  • Nerlove, M., A. Razin, and E. Sadka. (1984). “Income Distribution Policies with Endogenous Fertility,” Journal of Public Economics 24(2), 221–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, S., and C. Campbell. (1993). “Differential Fertility and the Distribution of Traits: the Case of I.Q,” American Journal of Sociology 98(5), 997–1019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Razzaz, S. (1998). “Fertility and Growth: The Significance of Gender Differences in Human Capital.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Brown University.

  • Repetto, R. (1978). “Interaction of Fertility and Size Distribution of Income,” Journal of Development Studies 14(4), 22–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. P. (1981). Economics of Population. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, R., and A. Heston. (1991). “The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons, 1950–1988,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(2).

  • United Nations. (1987). Fertility Behavior in the Context of Development: Evidence from the World Fertility Survey. Population Studies No. 100, New York: United Nations, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1995). Women's Education and Fertility Behavior: Recent Evidence From the Demographic and Health Surveys. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1999). World Development Report 1999/2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kremer, M., Chen, D.L. Income Distribution Dynamics with Endogenous Fertility. Journal of Economic Growth 7, 227–258 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020154031908

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020154031908

Navigation